The Survival of American
Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
CounCil on library and information resourCes
and the library of Congress
by David Pierce
September 2013
The Survival of
American Silent Feature
Films: 1912–1929
by David Pierce
September 2013
Council on Library and Information Resources
and The Library of Congress
Washington, D.C.
Commissioned for and
sponsored by the National
Film Preservation Board
Mr. Pierce has also created a da tabase of location
information on the archival lm holdings identied in
the course of his research.
See www.loc.gov/lm.
ISBN 978-1-932326-39-0
CLIR Publication No. 158
Copublished by:
and
Additional copies are available for $30 each. Orders may be placed through CLIR’s Web site.
This publication is also available online at no charge at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub158.
The paper in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard
for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials ANSI Z39.48-1984.
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Pierce, David.
The survival of American silent feature lms, 1912-1929 / by David Pierce.
pages cm -- (CLIR publication ; no. 158)
“Commissioned for and sponsored by the National Film Preservation Board.”
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 978-1-932326-39-0 (alk. paper)
1. Motion picture lm--Preservation--United States. 2. Silent lms--United States--History and criticism. 3. Motion picture lm
collections--United States--Archival resources. I. Council on Library and Information Resources. II. Library of Congress. III.
National Film Preservation Board (U.S.) IV. Title.
TR886.3.P54 2013
791.43--dc23
2013026170
8
Cover: Cameraman Rudolph Bergquist (with Mitchell camera) and director Phil Rosen (kneeling) pose during the shooting of
The White Monkey (1925), an Arthur H. Sawyer-Barney Lubin production for First National Pictures, Inc. An incomplete copy of
this lm survives at the Packard Campus for Audio Visual Conservation, Library of Congress Motion Picture, Broadcasting and
Recorded Sound Division.
Photo: The Robert S. Birchard Collection.
Council on Library and Information Resources
1707 L Street NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20036
Web site at http://www.clir.org
The Library of Congress
101 Independence Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20540
Web site at http://www.loc.gov
The National Film Preservation Board
The National Film Preservation Board was established at the Library of Congress by the National Film Preservation Act of 1988, and
most recently reauthorized by the U.S. Congress in 2008. Among the provisions of the law is a mandate to “undertake studies and
investigations of lm preservation activities as needed, including the ecacy of new technologies, and recommend solutions to im-
prove these practices.” More information about the National Film Preservation Board can be found at http://www.loc.gov/lm/.
iii
Contents
About the Author ......................................................v
Acknowledgments ....................................................vi
Foreword ............................................................vii
Executive Summary ....................................................1
Introduction ...........................................................5
The Silent Film Era Comes to an End......................................8
Overview of What Has Been Lost........................................10
Evolving Views of Silent Cinema ....................................10
The Cultural Loss..................................................11
The Cinematic Loss ................................................13
Methodology, Denitions, and Scope of This Study ........................16
Purpose of This Study ..............................................16
Denition of an American Silent Feature Film .........................17
Historical Period of Study ..........................................18
Sources of Data....................................................20
Findings .............................................................21
Most American Silent Feature Films Are Lost..........................21
Not All Surviving Films Are Complete ...............................25
Films Survive in Dierent Formats...................................26
The Preferred Edition is the 35mm Domestic-Release Version ........26
Many Films Survive Only in Small-Gauge Formats .................29
Summary of Surviving Film Elements ................................37
Source of the Surviving Copies ......................................39
Studios .......................................................41
Independent Producers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Stars and Directors .............................................46
Private Collectors ..............................................47
Films Surviving Only in Foreign Archives.............................48
Foreign Distribution............................................48
American Films Recovered from Foreign Archives..................50
Identication and Repatriation...................................52
The Likelihood of Future Discoveries .............................54
Additional Considerations .............................................55
Conclusions and Recommendations .....................................58
Appendix: FIAF Archives Reporting Holdings of
American Silent Feature Films.......................................62
Photo Credits .........................................................63
iv
Figures
Figure 1: Survival Status of American Silent Feature Films,
by Year and Format ...........................................2
Figure 2: Through the Back Door (1921)–Poster .............................6
Figure 3: The Jazz Singer (1927)–Poster ...................................9
Figure 4: Ladies of the Mob (1928) Starring Clara Bow–Window Card ........10
Figure 5: Her Wild Oat (1927) with Drawing by H. B. Beckho–Poster .......12
Figure 6: The Mark of Zorro (1920)–Poster ................................14
Figure 7: War Brides (1916)–Advertisement ..............................15
Figure 8: The Four Horseman of the Apocalypse (1921)–Poster ................17
Figure 9: Number of U.S. Silent Feature Films Released, by Year............18
Figure 10: Three Bad Men (1926)–Lobby Card..............................20
Figure 11: The Patsy (1928)–Lobby Card ..................................23
Figure 12: Denitions and Categories of Film Completeness, with Examples ..24
Figure 13: American Silent Feature Film Survival,
by Categories of Completeness ................................26
Figure 14: Guide to Major Film Distribution Formats ......................28
Figure 15: Watching Small-Gauge Films at Home..........................29
Figure 16: Advertisement for Kodascope Libraries.........................30
Figure 17: Pathéscope Reels ............................................34
Figure 18: American Silent Feature Film Survival, by Format
(complete and incomplete)....................................37
Figure 19: Statistics for Survival of American Silent Feature Films,
by Format and Completeness .................................38
Figure 20: Our Dancing Daughters (1928)–Lobby Card ......................40
Figure 21: Three Silent Paramount Features...............................44
Figure 22: The Red Kimono (1926)–Lobby Card.............................45
Figure 23: Location of Surviving American Silent Feature Films .............49
Figure 24: Tom Mix in Oh, You Tony! (1924)–Lobby Card....................52
Figure 25: Chicago (1928)–Lobby Card....................................54
Figure 26: King Vidor’s The Crowd (1928)–Poster ..........................56
Figure 27: John Barrymore in Beau Brummel (1924)–Poster ..................57
Figure 28: Surviving and Lost American Silent Feature Films, by Year ........61
Tables
Table 1: Sources of Surviving Copies of Studio-Owned American
Silent Feature Films, Grouped by Owner........................41
Case Studies
A Lost Classic Once Released in 16mm ...................................31
Directors and 16mm ...................................................32
Paramount Pictures....................................................43
v
About the Author
David Pierce is a historian and an archivist. At the British Film Institute (BFI)
from 2001 to 2004, he was head of preservation of the National Film and
Television Archive (NFTVA), and was appointed curator (head) of the archive
in 2002. He led the NFTVA’s restoration project for F. W. Murnau’s Sunrise
(1927) with the Academy Film Archive and Twentieth Century Fox.
Before his time at the BFI and since, Mr. Pierce has been active as a mo-
tion picture copyright consultant, advising motion picture producers, dis-
tributors, and exhibitors on the copyright and ownership of lms and televi-
sion programs. In 1999, he produced the theatrical, video, and DVD release of
Peter Pan (1924) through Kino International, recording a new orchestral score
and preparing new 35mm prints from a restored negative.
Mr. Pierce’s research examines the connections between lm history,
copyright, distribution, exhibition, and ownership, and his articles have
appeared in American Film, Film Comment, American Cinematographer, Film
History, and The Moving Image. His seminal article, “The Legion of the Con-
demned: Why American Silent Films Perished,” appeared in Film History in
1997 and was reprinted in This Film Is Dangerous, published in 2002 by the
International Federation of Film Archives (FIAF). His reference book on the
copyright status of lms of the 1950s was published in 1989.
Mr. Pierce founded the Media History Digital Library, a project to digitize
and provide free and open access to the printed record of the motion picture
and broadcasting industries. He has worked with archives, libraries, and col-
lectors to contribute to a comprehensive collection of research resources.
This is Mr. Pierce’s fourth research report for the American archival sec-
tor. His previous research reports on digital-access and commercial-access
strategies were commissioned by the Library of Congress, the UCLA Film &
Television Archive, and George Eastman House.
Mr. Pierce has also curated lm programs and lectured at the National
Film Theatre in London and the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC.
He is a member of the editorial board of the journal of the Association of
Moving Image Archivists, The Moving Image. He has lectured at lm-preserva-
tion schools, academic conferences, and festivals. He is a graduate of the Uni-
versity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and received his MBA from George
Washington University in Washington, DC.
vi
Acknowledgments
This project was commissioned by the Library of Congress National Film
Preservation Board. I thank Alan Gevinson, Patrick Loughney, Stephen
Leggett, Gregory Lukow, Mike Mashon, Donna Ross, and Rob Stone for their
support and assistance.
An early version of the database associated with this report was devel-
oped over many years by Dr. Jon Mirsalis. His support of this project is ap-
preciated. Clyde Jeavons and Roger Smither provided the opportunity to
present an earlier version of this research at the 2000 International Federation
of Film Archives (FIAF) Congress in London.
Numerous archivists provided information for this project: Michael
Pogorzelski and Thelma Ross (Academy Film Archive); Paolo Cherchi Usai,
Ed Stratmann, Caroline Yeager, and James Layton (George Eastman House);
David Francis, Zoran Sinobad, James Cozart, Rosemary Hanes, Josie Walters-
Johnson, Madeline Matz, David Parker, Paul Spehr, and George Willeman
(Library of Congress); Ron Magliozzi, Katie Trainor, and Eileen Bowser
(Museum of Modern Art); Nancy Goldman (Pacic Film Archive); Jan-
Christopher Horak, Eddie Richmond, Robert Gitt, Todd Weiner, and Steven
Hill (University of California, Los Angeles); Elaine Burrows, Jane Hockings,
and Olwen Terris (British Film Institute/National Film and Television
Archive); Ronald Grant (Cinema Museum); Vladimir Opela (Národní
Filmovy Archiv); and archivists at the American Film Institute (Susan Dalton,
Larry Karr, Audrey Kupferberg, and Kim Tomadjoglou).
Input from studio archivists was invaluable: Bob O’Neil (NBC Universal);
Grover Crisp, Michael Friend, and Rita Belda (Sony Pictures Entertainment);
Schawn Belston (20th Century Fox Film Corporation), and Ned Price (Warner
Bros.).
I appreciate the support, past and present, of many archivists, schol-
ars, and collectors, including Gordon Berkow, Robert S. Birchard, Serge
Bromberg, Dan Bursik, Rusty Casselton, Herb Gra, Patricia King Hanson,
Eric Hoyt, Ed Hulse, Marty Kearns, Richard Koszarski, Ted Larson, Rob
McKay, Leonard Maltin, Bill O’Farrell, Richard Scheckman, Sam Sherman,
Anthony Slide, Jack Theakston, Karl Thiede, and Joe Yranski. For information
on 9.5mm, my thanks to contacts in Britain, including Patrick Moules and
Tony Sarey. My assessments of 9.5mm releases rely on the research of David
Wyatt and Garth Pedler. My appreciation to Scott MacQueen for sharing his
experience and insight.
I also thank the archivists who acquired many of the lms, worked for
their preservation, and made them accessible to the wider public. And special
acknowledgment to Kevin Brownlow, James Card, Paul Killiam, and David
Shepard.
vii
Foreword
On behalf of the Library of Congress, I am pleased to introduce this ground-
breaking study of the survival rates of feature-length movies produced in the
United States before the general advent of the sound era. Fellow historian
and archivist David Pierce has taken a major step toward resolving one of the
most intractable problems in the eld of lm preservation: determining, with
certainty, how many of the lms produced in the United States during the
twentieth century survive today. Mr. Pierce has also created a valuable da-
tabase of location information on the archival lm holdings identied in the
course of his research (see www.loc.gov/lm/).
Enormous eort and dedication over a long period of time was required
to collect and verify the information compiled in this report, involving travel
to the major lm archives of the world and careful research through many
types of archival and business records. Movies of the silent era posed a partic-
ularly dicult challenge because those lms have endured the longest period
of neglect and deterioration.
Film archivists and historians have long known that a large percentage
of the movies produced in the United States since the 1890s have been lost,
survive only in fragmentary form, or exist in copies of such inferior image
quality that it is almost impossible now to understand why they were often
hailed as works of great artistic achievement by the audiences who rst saw
them. A great deal of anecdotal information about lost lms has long been
available—particularly about the lms of the most famous lmmakers. But
this is the rst systematic survey of how many of the lms produced by U.S.
lm studios in the early twentieth century still exist and where the surviv-
ing lm elements are located in the world’s leading lm archives and private
collections.
When Congress enacted the National Film Preservation Act of 1988,
establishing the Library of Congress National Film Preservation Board and
National Film Registry, I directed that one of the long-term goals of the Board
would be to support archival research projects that would answer the open
questions about the survival rates of American movies produced, in all major
categories of production, during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. I
refer not just to the feature lms, but also to the travelogues, one- and two-
reel comedies, animated shorts, documentaries, newsreels, educational lms,
avant garde lms, and other types of movies that constituted the lm-going
experience throughout much of the twentieth century.
Mr. Pierce’s ndings tell us that only 14% of the feature lms produced
in the United States during the period 1912–1929 survive in the format in
which they were originally produced and distributed, i.e., as complete works
on 35mm lm. Another 11% survive in full-length foreign versions or on
viii
lm formats of lesser image quality such as 16mm and other smaller gauge
formats.
The Library of Congress can now authoritatively report that the loss of
American silent-era feature lms constitutes an alarming and irretrievable
loss to our nation’s cultural record. Even if we could preserve all the silent-
era lms known to exist today in the U.S. and in foreign lm archives—some-
thing not yet accomplished—it is certain that we and future generations have
already lost 75% of the creative record from the era that brought American
movies to the pinnacle of world cinematic achievement in the twentieth
century.
On a positive note, the inventory database compiled by Mr. Pierce not
only identies the silent-era archival lm elements that survive but also their
locations in the foreign lm archives that saved them from destruction. This
information will make it possible to develop a nationally coordinated plan to
repatriate those “lost” American movies and ensure that they are preserved
before further losses occur.
Mr. Pierce’s report is a model for the kind of fact-based archival research
that remains to be conducted on all genres of American lm beyond the scope
of silent-era feature lms. In addition, the same level of archival scrutiny
must be applied to all historically signicant audiovisual media produced
since the nineteenth century, including sound recordings, radio and television
broadcasts, and other new media judged to be worth saving and preserving
for posterity.
Thanks to the continued support of the Congress and the great generosity
of David Woodley Packard, the Library of Congress has the largest and most
up-to-date facility anywhere for preserving lm and audiovisual media to the
highest archival standards. In cooperation with colleagues in private sector
and non-prot archives, we will now be able to meet the challenge of preserv-
ing a more comprehensive archival record of American lm and audiovisual
creativity produced during the decades following the silent era.
—James H. Billington
The Librarian of Congress
1
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Executive Summary
T
he era of the American silent feature lm lasted from 1912
until 1929. During that time, lmmakers established the
language of cinema, and the motion pictures they created
reached a height of artistic sophistication. These lms, with their rec-
ognizable stars and high production values, spread American culture
around the world. Silent feature lms disappeared from sight soon
after the coming of sound, and many vanished from existence.
This report focuses on those titles that have managed to survive
to the present day and represents the rst comprehensive survey
of the survival of American silent feature lms. The American Film
Institute Catalog of Feature Films documents 10,919 silent feature
lms of American origin released through 1930. Treasures from the
Film Archives, published by the International Federation of Film
Archives (FIAF), is the primary source of information regarding si-
lent lm survival in the archival community. The FIAF information
has been enhanced by information from corporations, libraries, and
private collectors.
We have good documentation on what American silent feature
lms were produced and released. This study quanties the “what,”
“where,” and “why” of their survival. The survey was designed to
answer ve questions:
How many lms survive?
There is no single number for existing American silent-era feature
lms, as the surviving copies vary in format and completeness. There
are 1,575 titles (14%) surviving as the complete domestic-release ver-
sion in 35mm. Another 1,174 (11%) are complete, but not the original
—they are either a foreign-release version in 35mm or in a 28 or 16mm
small-gauge print with less than 35mm image quality. Another 562
titles (5%) are incomplete—missing either a portion of the lm or an
abridged version. The remaining 70% are believed to be completely lost.
With respect to preservation, one studio stands out. Starting in
the early 1960s, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) preserved at the
corporation’s expense 113 silent features produced or distributed by
MGM or its predecessor companies. Starting in the 1930s, MGM also
gave prints or negatives for 120 silent feature lms to American ar-
chives, primarily George Eastman House. The survival rate of silent
lms produced by MGM after its founding in 1924 is 68%, the high-
est of any studio. For other companies, the proportion is much lower.
2
David Pierce
Who holds the surviving lms?
Foreign archives have proved to be an important resource for re-
covering important American lms and lling gaps in the careers
of directors and stars. The largest collection of exported American
lms has come from Národní Filmovy Archiv in the Czech Republic.
Even when lms survive in the United States, the foreign versions
often provide crucial missing material for restorations. Of the 3,311
American silent feature lms that survive in any form, 886 were
found overseas. Of these, 210 (23%) have already been repatriated to
an American archive either as part of a large-scale repatriation proj-
ect, such as the Goslmofond-Library of Congress agreement initi-
ated in 2010, or as a one-time trade.
How complete are the surviving lms?
Only 2,749 (25%) of American silent feature lms survive in com-
plete form. Another 562 (17% of the surviving titles and 5% of total
production) survive in incomplete form. Of these, at least 151 titles
survive in versions that have one reel missing. Another 275 titles
survive in versions that are not complete, missing two reels or more.
This includes the lms that survive only in 9.5mm abridgements and
many of the Eastman Kodak Kodascope 16mm home library releases
where footage was eliminated to reduce the running time. Finally,
there are 136 conrmed fragments, where one reel or less survives.
There are probably many more odd reels in collections, unidentied
and uncataloged.
Number of lms
Fig. 1: Survival Status of American
Silent Feature Films, by Year and
Format
3
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
In what format does the most complete copy survive?
Of the 2,749 silent features that survive in complete form, 406 exist
only in formats other than 35mm—small-gauge format 28mm and
16mm prints. Even more titles survive as abridged versions in 16 and
9.5mm copies. At least 72 American silent features were released in
28mm, mostly titles from the teens. Of these, 39 survive only in the
28mm format. Another 365 titles—11% of the 3,311 features that exist
in some form—survive only in 16mm editions.
In Europe, the home market was dominated by the Pathé 9.5mm
format. Of the 129 American silent features released in abridged
versions on 9.5mm, at least 56 exist in no other form. Another 18 fea-
tures survive only as paper prints submitted for copyright purposes
to the Library of Congress between 1912 and 1915.
Where was the best surviving copy found?
Of the 3,311 feature lms that survive in complete or incomplete
copies, roughly 1,699 were produced by one of the major studios
(or their predecessor companies). Of those, 531 titles passed directly
from the studio to an archive, or were preserved by the studio. Twice
as many studio titles, 1,168, have emerged from other sources.
Other lms survive because the original producer kept the nega-
tive or a print, directors and stars obtained copies for their personal
collections, or private collectors acquired a print.
It is impossible to determine in advance which lms will stand
the test of time as art, or which will prove signicant as a social re-
cord. With so many gaps in the historical record, every silent lm is
of some value and illuminates dierent elements of our history.
In the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s, when many more silent lms
still existed, there was never any hope to save everything; the focus
was to rescue the most important lms. The perennial lack of fund-
ing limited acquisitions and ensured that acquisition, cataloging,
and exhibition were on a small scale until the late 1960s, when the
National Endowment for the Arts began providing signicant nan-
cial support.
In addition, the public domain status of some independently
produced lms encouraged their survival. For the most part, their
producers were no longer in business and there was no one to le the
copyright renewal. Once they fell into the public domain, prints were
acquired by entrepreneurs who preserved them in the course of com-
mercial exploitation.
This report concludes with six recommendations:
1. Develop a nationally coordinated program to repatriate U.S.
feature lms from foreign archives. Of the 886 American silent
feature lms that survive only in foreign-release versions found
outside the United States, 676 (76%) have not been repatriated to
an American archive; the only copies are located overseas. These
titles should be reviewed and priorities set for repatriation to the
United States.
4
David Pierce
2. Collaborate with studios and rights-holders to acquire archival
master lm elements on unique titles. Many of the lms pre-
served by MGM in the 1960s still are not held by any American
archive, and other companies have some unique material. A
comparison of holdings between archives and studios will likely
identify additional titles held only by the rights-holders.
3. Encourage coordination among U.S. archives and collectors to
identify silent lms surviving only in small-gauge formats. This
project identied many lms held outside of FIAF archives in
nonarchival collections, including titles released on home library
gauges of 28mm, 16mm, and 9.5mm. A focused outreach program
would provide an opportunity to identify copies that still survive
in private hands.
4. Focus increased preservation attention on small-gauge lms.
The greatest cache of unexplored surviving titles are the 432
American silent feature lms that survive only in 16mm. Digital
scanning would allow high-quality preservation, with restoration
to follow, while the lm copies can be returned to their owners.
5. Work with other American and foreign lm archives to docu-
ment “unidentied” titles. An aggressive campaign to identify
unknown titles could recover important lms.
6. Encourage the exhibition and rediscovery of silent feature lms
among the general public and scholarly community. The num-
ber of America’s silent feature lms surviving in complete 35mm
copies as originally released is a disappointingly low 14% (1,575
of 10,919 features). This shortfall can be partially compensated by
an increased emphasis on providing wide public access to those
lms that do survive for scholarship and public enjoyment. While
the academic interest can be met by high-quality streaming video
over the Internet, these lms come to life only when they are
shown to audiences. Archives can shift from a primary focus on
preservation of their collections to lling the gaps in their hold-
ings through targeted acquisition, and then emphasizing wide
public availability of their holdings.
5
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
THAT THE UNITED STATES is fighting a losing battle to
save its film heritage is clearest from a sobering, often-noted
historical fact. Current efforts of preservationists begin from
the recognition that a great percentage of American film has
already been irretrievably lost—intentionally thrown away or
allowed to deteriorate.
Exactly how much of America’s film production has already
been lost remains difficult to say. The most familiar statistic,
which has attained its authority primarily through repetition, is
that we have lost 50% of all titles produced before 1950.
Film Preservation 1993: A Study of the Current
State of American Film Preservation
1
Introduction
T
he era of the American silent feature lm lasted from 1912
to 1929, no longer than the period between the release of The
Godfather (1972) and The Godfather: Part III (1990). During that
brief span of time, lmmakers established the language of modern
cinema, while the motion pictures they created reached the height
of artistic sophistication. Going to the movies became the world’s
most successful form of popular entertainment, and these lms—
with their recognizable stars and high production values—spread
American culture around the globe.
The silent cinema was not a primitive style of lmmaking, wait-
ing for better technology to appear, but an alternate form of storytell-
ing, with artistic triumphs equivalent to or greater than those of the
sound lms that followed. Few art forms emerged as quickly, came
to an end as suddenly, or vanished more completely than the silent
lm. Once sound became the standard form of narrative lmmaking,
with the exception of some classics available for educational screen-
ings from the Museum of Modern Art, the masterpieces of the era
largely disappeared from view.
2
Nearly all sound lms from the nitrate era of the 1930s and
1940s survive because they had commercial value for television in
the 1950s and new copies were made while the negatives were still
intact. Unfortunately, silent lms had no such widespread com-
mercial value—then or now. Nearly 11,000 silent feature lms were
1
Film Preservation 1993: A Study of the Current State of American Film Preservation. Report
of the Librarian of Congress (Washington, DC: National Film Preservation Board of the
Library of Congress, 1993), 3. Available at http://www.loc.gov/lm/study.html.
2
The Museum of Modern Art Film Library was established in 1935 “for the purpose
of collecting and preserving outstanding motion pictures of all types and of making
them available to colleges and museums, thus to render possible for the rst time a
considered study of the lm as art.” “The Founding of the Film Library,” Bulletin of the
Museum of Modern Art 3, no. 2 (November 1935), 2.
6
David Pierce
produced, yet today, just 80 years after the silent lm era ended, only
a small proportion exists to be seen. The reasons for the loss—chemi-
cal decay, re, lack of commercial value, cost of storage—are docu-
mented elsewhere and are outside the scope of this report. Similarly
outside the purview of this report is the preservation status of the
lms that remain.
This report covers the survival of the American silent feature
lm, describing its cultural signicance and the statistics and impact
of its loss. This statistical analysis cannot reect the elements of en-
tertainment value and artistic achievement that are gone forever. All
the features of Buster Keaton, Charles Chaplin, and Harold Lloyd,
the lms Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks made during the
peak of their popularity in the 1920s, and the big epics, from The
Birth of a Nation (1915) to Wings (1927), still exist. But for every lm
that survives, there are half a dozen that do not, and for every clas-
sic that is seen today, many more of equal importance at the time are
now missing and presumed lost.
Many of Mary Pickford’s lms survive because she sent lms in
which she starred to the Library of Congress in 1946. “I wish to say
to you,” she wrote, “how happy I am that my pictures will be housed
in the Library of Congress and how greatly I appreciate
the honor conferred upon me by your wish to have them
there.”
3
Much of what survives is the result of the eorts of
U.S. and international lm archives curating their collec-
tions—identifying titles of interest and then actively seeking
copies, building relationships with rights-holders, and occa-
sionally acquiring entire collections.
More common than enthusiastic stars, however, were
unsentimental businessmen, such as producer Samuel
Goldwyn. In response to the Museum of Modern Art Film
Library’s inquiry about the destruction of sets on the backlot
he had taken over from Pickford and Fairbanks, Goldwyn
replied, “[You] must realize that I cannot rest on the laurels
of the past and cannot release traditions instead of current
pictures.”
4
The major studios were even less sentimental about their
traditions, with their focus only on current releases. The
exception was the active duplication program conducted by
MGM under the leadership of Raymond Klune and Roger
Mayer, which started around 1960. This led to the preserva-
tion of every lm still surviving in the studio’s vaults—lms
from MGM and aliated companies. Once preserved by the studio,
the remaining nitrate masters were donated to George Eastman
3
Mary Pickford to Luther Evans, Librarian of Congress, October 29, 1946. Motion
Picture Division Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress.
4
Samuel Goldwyn to John Abbott, Museum of Modern Art Film Library, telegram,
August 18, 1938. Goldwyn le, Master collection les, Museum of Modern Art
Department of Film. Thanks to Ron Magliozzi for making this material available.
Fig. 2: Through the Back Door
(1921)–Poster. Mary Pickford worked
to ensure the survival of her lms,
starting with a donation of lms in
which she starred to the Library of
Congress in 1946.
7
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
House starting in 1965. The other studios merely stored what nitrate
still remained in their collections, destroying copies as they started
to show evidence of deterioration.
Starting in 1968, the eorts of the American Film Institute (AFI),
funded by the National Endowment for the Arts, led to the place-
ment of other studio nitrate collections with archives. The surviving
Columbia Pictures and Warner Bros. silent negatives and Paramount
prints came to the Library of Congress, along with the few surviving
Universal silent features held by the studio. The Museum of Modern
Art acquired the Fox nitrate prints, with a few titles going to other
archives. Thirty years later, a discovery of additional Fox material
was placed with the Academy Film Archive. The First National
productions still in existence were deposited with George Eastman
House and the UCLA Film & Television Archive.
Each archive has also received lms from collectors, small com-
panies, and overseas archives, thus preserving and providing access
to titles that would otherwise have been lost or at least unavailable
in the United States. Dierences in collecting policies, personalities,
parent organizations, and funding challenges for the ve major U.S.
archives have led to a variety of holdings that together constitute the
national collection. Because some silent features are held by more
than one archive it is not possible to neatly characterize which ar-
chive has the most titles.
David Woodley Packard has provided the most wide-ranging
support for archival activities, rst through the David and Lucile
Packard Foundation and subsequently the Packard Humanities
Institute (PHI). The Packard Campus for Audio Visual Conservation,
designed and built by PHI for the Library of Congress, became op-
erational in 2008 with state-of-the-art storage facilities to ensure the
longevity of collections. The library’s nitrate-preservation program
began in 1958 and moved to an in-house preservation lm labora-
tory in 1970. This work is now performed at the custom-built ar-
chival lm laboratory at the Packard Campus. PHI also supported
the development of a nitrate-storage facility for the UCLA Film &
Television Archive in Santa Clarita, California, opening in 2008 as
the rst phase of a fully developed preservation center.
The transformation of lm archiving began in the 1980s, thanks
to the eorts of Sir J. Paul Getty, Jr., who provided nancial support
for a Conservation Centre and new nitrate vaults for the National
Film and Television Archive in the United Kingdom. In the United
States, additional signicant funding for archive infrastructure has
been contributed by Celeste Bartos, the Louis B. Mayer Foundation,
For every silent lm that survives
there are half a dozen that do not.
8
David Pierce
and the Academy Foundation.
5
This report focuses on those American silent feature lms that
have managed to survive to the present day. It is the rst comprehen-
sive survey of the survival of American silent feature lms. It pro-
vides context for both the survivors and the missing. The statistics
are humbling, documenting losses that would be unimaginable for
any other serious art form.
The report’s signicance lies not only in putting a gure to the
survival rate but also in establishing a statistical foundation for the
work to follow. Development of strategies to preserve and access the
remnants of America’s silent lm heritage can now be based on solid
data. The identication of gaps in holdings by American archives
can encourage the repatriation of titles that exist only in overseas
collections or with private companies. Even for titles that are already
preserved elsewhere, domestic archives perform an important role in
providing access.
For many titles, the copies released to home and school markets
are now the sole surviving record of those works. Because these edi-
tions are on safety lm, their acquisition and preservation had been
seen as less urgent, but the prints are subject to chemical deteriora-
tion. These small-gauge editions need focused attention in coopera-
tion with the collector community to ensure their survival, as unique
copies of lms become untraceable over time.
6
Developing accurate and comprehensive lists of surviving and
missing lms will support the archival sector’s goal to preserve
America’s cinema history and make it available to the public.
The Silent Film Era Comes to an End
The rst Academy Awards, cohosted by Academy President Douglas
Fairbanks and Vice President William C. deMille, were presented at a
dinner at the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel on May 16, 1929. While the
Oscars represented a new maturity for the industry, the rst awards
were also a farewell to its early years. Since the most commercially
successful lm of the season was not successful in the voting, the
Academy board created a special award for The Jazz Singer. “These
awards are given for work accomplished during the year 1928,”
deMille told the audience. “There is only one award in this whole list
that has anything to do with talking pictures. It seems strange when
you stop and look over the eld and see how many talking pictures
are being distributed today.”
7
5
The Celeste Bartos Film Preservation Center of the Museum of Modern Art opened
in 1996, the same year as George Eastman House’s Louis B. Mayer Conservation
Center. The Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study in Hollywood, home of the
Academy Film Archive, opened in 2002. The Academy Foundation, the educational
and cultural arm of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, funds the
Academy Film Archive.
6
For example, a 16mm original print of Wild Beauty (1927), a Universal western with
Rex the Wonder Horse, not held by any archive, sold on eBay on May 13, 2011.
7
AMPAS Bulletin, no. 22, (June 3, 1929): 2–3, The Academy of Motion Picture Arts
and Sciences, Margaret Herrick Library Digital Collections. Available at http://
digitalcollections.oscars.org.
9
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
The Academy had selected the lms that its
members saw as the pinnacle of their art, a seamless
combination of expressive acting, expressionistic
photography, the moving camera, a minimum of
dialog and titles, and an unreality of time and place.
This technique was being replaced by a new type of
lm that, at least initially, often featured stage acting,
static photography, a xed camera, and an emphasis
on dialogue, sound, and space that audiences found
refreshing and real. Those “talking lms” managed
to overtake and obliterate the silent feature so rapidly
that by the date of the rst Academy Awards, nearly
every rst-run lm playing in New York City was a
talkie. A month later, Douglas Fairbanks started work
on his rst all-talking lm. The holdouts had surren-
dered and the sound revolution was complete.
8
Silent lms became an increasingly distant
memory as the history of the rst four decades of lm
was left behind. In 1947, to commemorate its twenti-
eth anniversary, the Academy scheduled screenings
of each year’s award-winning lms. After a mere
two decades, ve of the winners from the rst year
could not be shown, as “no prints are available.”
9
Within another two decades, several titles that were
screened in the 1947 series no longer were believed
to exist, including two lms starring German actor
Emil Jannings: The Way of All Flesh (1927), featuring his Academy
Award–winning performance, as well as Ernst Lubitsch’s The Patriot
(1928), the only Best Picture nominee that today is not known to ex-
ist (beyond a beautifully executed fragment).
10
The New York Times
called the latter “a gripping piece of work” and praised Jannings’
performance in “the most dicult role of his lm career.”
11
Unfortunately, we have to accept the reviewer’s word for it, as
we cannot judge for ourselves.
8
On May 16, 1929, the seven rst-run Times Square theaters that changed programs
weekly were running six talkies and one silent. The 12 extended-run theaters were
running 10 talkies and 2 part-talkies. The rst Oscars were presented for lms released
between August 1, 1927 and July 31, 1928, following the theatrical season. Academy
Awards Database, 1927/1928. Available at http://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/ampas_
awards. Starting in 1934, the awards were presented for lms released in the previous
calendar year.
9
The unavailable titles were The Last Command, with Emil Jannings; Sunrise; The
Dove, with Norma Talmadge; Tempest, with John Barrymore; and Charlie Chaplin’s
The Circus. All these lms survive today, though the safety-lm copy of The Dove has
extensive nitrate decomposition copied from the deteriorating original.
10
The Way of All Flesh was shown at the Academy Theatre on November 23, 1947. A
three-minute excerpt from The Way of All Flesh was included in the Paramount short
Movie Milestones no. 1 (1935). A seven-minute fragment from The Patriot is held by
the Cinemateca Portuguesa - Museu do Cinema. The trailer for The Patriot has been
preserved by the UCLA Film & Television Archive. The trailer is included in the DVD
set, More Treasures from American Film Archives, 1894–1931.
11
Mordaunt Hall, “The Patriot,” New York Times, August 18, 1928. Available at http://
movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=990CE0D61431E33ABC4052DFBE668383639
EDE.
Fig. 3: The Jazz Singer (1927)–Poster.
When the rst Academy Awards
were presented in 1929, silent lm
was already on the decline. A special
award was created for The Jazz
Singer, the rst feature-length motion
picture with synchronized dialog
sequences.
10
David Pierce
Overview of What Has Been Lost
Evolving Views of Silent Cinema
Clara Bow was the living embodiment of the Roaring
Twenties and remains as luminous a personality today as
when she was one of the ve top box oce draws in the late
1920s. Her vitality, enthusiasm, and sensuality are undimin-
ished, and the movies from the peak of her career—the half
of her lms that survive today, that is—still delight audi-
ences. Perhaps this is not as signicant a loss to humanity
as the disappearance of all but 19 of the more than 90 plays
by Euripides, but at least we can attribute the absence of the
latter to the loss of the Ancient Library of Alexandria, not to
neglect.
12
For popular artists such as Clara Bow and her con-
temporaries, the view of both the industry and the public
regarding their work was captured in 1934 by Los Angeles
Times drama critic Edwin Schallert:
Making pictures is not like writing literature or composing
music or painting masterpieces. The screen story is essentially
a thing of today and once it has had its run, that day is nished.
So far there has never been a classic lm in the sense that there is
a classic novel or poem or canvas or sonata. Last year’s picture,
however strong its appeal at the time, is a book that has gone out
of circulation.
13
Starting in the late 1940s, television led to renewed life and au-
diences for sound lms. Meanwhile, silent lms succumbed to the
perils of nitrate lm (re or decay), lack of commercial value, and an
extended period of disinterest by both owners and audiences.
14
But tastes change, views of what is important evolve, and the
passage of 80 years has seen an acceptance of lm as one of the ma-
jor new art forms of the twentieth century. With the National Film
Preservation Act of 1988, the U.S. Congress established the National
Film Registry in the Library of Congress to designate lms that are
“culturally, historically, or aesthetically signicant.” Librarian of
Congress James H. Billington has selected 67 silent feature lms for
the registry (out of 600 total), and hundreds of other lms of the era
have been nominated by the general public.
15
12
David Stenn, Clara Bow: Runnin’ Wild (New York: Doubleday, 1998), 157–162. Martha
Nussbaum, Introduction to The Bacchae of Euripides: A New Version (New York: Farrar,
Straus and Giroux, 1990), xxvii.
13
Edwin Schallert, “Film Producers Shaken by Clean-Up Campaign,” Los Angeles
Times, June 10, 1934, 10.
14
For a detailed analysis of why most silent lms are lost, see David Pierce, “The
Legion of the Condemned: Why American Silent Films Perished,” Film History 9,
no. 1, (1997): 5–22. Reprinted with additional information in This Film Is Dangerous:
A Celebration of Nitrate Film, eds. Roger Smither and Catherine Surowiec (Brussels:
Fédération International des Archives du Film, 2002), 144–162.
15
Public Law 100-446: National Film Preservation Act of 1988. See http://www.loc.
gov/lm/lmabou.html, and Eric Schwartz, “The National Film Preservation Act
of 1988: A Copyright Case Study in the Legislative Process,” Journal of the Copyright
Society of the U.S.A. 36 (January 1989): 137–159.
Fig. 4: Ladies of the Mob (1928)
starring Clara Bow–Window Card.
None of the four feature lms that
starred Clara Bow in 1928 are known
to exist.
11
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Two of Clara Bow’s 1927 lms—It and Wings—are on the registry.
They are among the hundreds of silent lms shown in public screen-
ings each year. The San Francisco Silent Film Festival, which has
showcased both titles, annually attracts audiences of 13,000 people
over four days. But there will be no nominations or festival show-
ings for the lm that, as Frank Thompson noted, “was an important
opportunity [for Bow] to take on a starkly dramatic role after a long
string of what seemed to her inconsequential comedies and racy dra-
mas.” Ladies of the Mob is permanently out of circulation, along with
the other three features Clara Bow made in 1928—lost as assuredly as
is Euripides’ The Cretans.
16
The Cultural Loss
That this report focuses on cold statistics, numbers, and percent-
ages should not blind us to the cultural and historical loss that is
the greatest impact of the lost lms. Motion pictures in the teens
and twenties—before network radio, television, cell phones, and the
Internet—had an inuence that is hard to imagine today. In the mid-
1920s, movie theater attendance in the United States averaged 46
million admissions per week from a population of 116 million, ve
times the per capita attendance rate today.
17
“Because of the immensely seductive atmospherics of the overall
experience,” Scott Eyman wrote, “the silent lm had an unparal-
leled capacity to draw an audience inside it, probably because it
demanded the audience use its imagination. Viewers had to supply
the voices and sound eects; in so doing they made the nal creative
contribution to the lmmaking process. Silent lm was about more
than a movie; it was about an experience.”
18
Sharing that emotional visual experience in a darkened theater
with hundreds or even thousands of fellow lm goers with appropri-
ate music was a key part of the appeal. “The silent cinema was not
just a roll of lm in a can,” wrote Richard Koszarski. “It was a com-
plex social, aesthetic and economic fabric that brought the power of
16
Frank Thompson, Lost Films: Important Movies That Disappeared (New York: Citadel
Press, 1996), 234.
17
Historical attendance gures from Film Daily Yearbook of Motion Pictures (New
York: The Film Daily, 1951), 90. Modern attendance gures from “Theatrical Market
Statistics 2012,” Motion Picture Association of America, 6. Available at http://mpaa.
org/policy/industry.
18
Scott Eyman, The Speed of Sound: Hollywood and the Talkie Revolution 1926–1930 (New
York: Simon & Schuster, 1997), 20.
Motion pictures in the teens and twenties —before
network radio, television, cell phones, and the Internet—
had an inuence that is hard to imagine today.
12
David Pierce
the moving image into the twentieth century.”
19
Local theaters across
the nation were instrumental in helping bring together their com-
munities, while the lms they exhibited captured and reected the
environment in which they were made. Surviving lms permit us to
see city streets where horses still outnumber the cars that were soon
to displace them, and the hamlets and villages where the majority of
Americans still lived. Idealized innocence and grim reality coexist
in these works, along with documentary evidence of what people
wore, drove, and used to outt their houses. We can watch
the early years of ight, evolving attitudes toward minorities
and women, and rapid changes in public morals, the casual
use of cigarettes, and trolley cars.
Often these insights come in the smaller lms, especially
those dramas set in rural America where characters face
the moral dilemmas that result from rapid cultural change.
“Little programmers of the twenties may have relatively little
to oer artistically, but they are a marvelous record of their
times,” William K. Everson noted. “Our Dancing Daughters
is often referred to as the ‘denitive’ Jazz-Age lm, but it’s
the Jazz Age by luxurious MGM standards. Universal’s The
Mad Whirl and lower down the scale, Pathé’s Walking Back,
actually tell us more about how the jazz-age aected the av-
erage person, while Walking Back in addition comments on
the impact that Ernest Hemingway’s writing was having, by
shamelessly plagiarizing it!”
20
With such a hold on the popular imagination, motion
pictures inuenced fashion and leisure, and drove the emer-
gence of modern celebrity culture. As one example, actress
Colleen Moore presented a feisty yet wholesome innocence,
and her natural humor gave weight to her comedies and
depth of character to her dramatic roles. Moore received
more than 10,000 fan letters a week in 1926, when she was
the top female star and earning $10,000 per week. Moore’s
breakthrough was the starring role in Flaming Youth (1923),
where she personied a new breed of woman, the apper.
Audiences could visualize “just what a young woman who
amed and apped really looked like,” Jeanine Basinger
noted. “What she looked like was Colleen Moore.” Magazine art-
ist John Held, Jr., adopted Moore’s image of the chirpy and slightly
muddle-headed girl for his popular cartoons of bird-brained ap-
pers and their college boyfriends. Moore’s short hair led the national
craze among young women for “bobbed” hairstyles, and she further
inuenced fashion trends with the glamorous costumes and casual
outts she wore in her lms.
21
19
Richard Koszarski, An Evening’s Entertainment: The Age of the Silent Feature Picture,
1915–1928 (New York: Scribner, 1990), 324.
20
William K. Everson, “Should Everything Be Saved?,” Films in Review 29, no. 9
(November 1978): 541–544, 563.
21
Jeanine Basinger, Silent Stars (New York: Knopf, 2000), 420. The earliest lm in the
genre was The Flapper (1920), with Olive Thomas.
Fig. 5: Her Wild Oat (1927) with
Drawing by H. B. Beckhoff–Poster.
The lms of Colleen Moore and her
apper persona helped dene the
1920s.
13
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
The Cinematic Loss
The best-known silent lm actress today may be a ctional one,
Norma Desmond, the half-mad silent lm diva portrayed by a
genuine silent lm diva in Billy Wilder’s Sunset Blvd. (1950). Gloria
Swanson gives a riveting portrayal of a long-forgotten movie god-
dess for whom time stands still, eternally mired in the Hollywood
of 1928, subsisting on memories. As the lm’s doomed narrator tells
us, Norma is “still waving proudly to a parade which had long since
passed her by.” She’s a handy, if mostly inaccurate, stand-in not for
the dozens of real-life actresses who had short but generally satisfy-
ing careers and went on with their lives, but for the few stars, such as
Swanson, who held on to leading roles with an iron will and a tire-
less work ethic.
22
Norma shutters herself in her Beverly Hills mansion, with private
screenings of Queen Kelly, the genuine but never completed Swanson
lm of 1928. Norma can screen Queen Kelly, and so can we to this day,
because Miss Swanson placed her 35mm nitrate copy, along with a
few other lms from her career, at George Eastman House. But no ac-
curate assessment of the careers of the ctional Miss Desmond’s real-
life contemporaries is possible. There is so little to see.
The lms that survive provide the breadth of silent lm cul-
ture—it is still possible to view the full range of productions—but we
are missing the depth, as what survives are representative examples.
Scholars cannot adequately document the art and science of lm-
making without primary sources—the lms themselves—thus mak-
ing it challenging, if not impossible, to write in depth about many of
the people and companies that produced these lms.
Mary Pickford owned many of her lms and paid for their pres-
ervation. Of her 48 features, 8 lms from the rst three years of her
career are lost, but the rest survive. This is a very good survival rate
compared with that of many of her peers.
Pola Negri became a star in Germany, and the American period
of her silent lm career, from 1923 to 1928, continued her worldwide
fame. Although Paramount’s best directors guided her, the American
lms seldom matched the quality of her early lms in Germany.
Only 6 of her 20 starring American lms survive—the Museum of
Modern Art bought a print of Mauritz Stiller’s Hotel Imperial (1927)
from Paramount, as did George Eastman House with Barbed Wire
(1927). A Woman of the World (1925) exists in its complete American-
release version, and three others in their foreign versions. There is no
22
Billy Wilder, Sunset Boulevard (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), 44.
Scholars cannot adequately document
the art and science of lmmaking without
primary sources.
14
David Pierce
trace of the 14 other titles.
23
Of the 39 features that screen “vampire” Theda Bara
made between 1914 and 1919, only 2 survive. Norma
Talmadge was a star of “women’s pictures” from 1916
through to the transition to sound, yet only 28 of her 48 star-
ring features survive in complete form. Only 2 of the 34 lms
dramatic actress Pauline Frederick made before her career
triumph in Madame X (1920) are known to exist. And the
story is little better for Swanson herself, with only 15 of her
38 features surviving in complete 35mm editions.
24
We are fortunate to have all the Douglas Fairbanks lms
of the 1920s that established the popular images of Robin
Hood, Zorro, The Three Musketeers, and pirate adventures.
Whether you’ve seen the lms or not, it is Fairbanks’ rep-
resentations of these characters that live today, ltered and
morphed over the years by Errol Flynn, Antonio Banderas,
Michael York, and Johnny Depp. But we cannot follow the
career of Tom Mix, who transformed the western from its
Victorian theatrical melodrama roots into contemporary ac-
tion narrative. Only 12 of Mix’s 85 lighthearted westerns for
Fox survive in their original-release versions.
If popular culture is reected through entertainment,
then where are the major blockbusters of their day? There are no
known copies of The Rough Riders (1927), Victor Fleming’s tribute to
Theodore Roosevelt in the Spanish-American War. Who has seen the
surprise hit of 1924, the independently produced The Dramatic Life of
Abraham Lincoln, which codied the Lincoln myth for years to come?
Aquatic ballerina Annette Kellerman was a personality of such mag-
nitude that her life story was lmed in Technicolor as Million Dollar
Mermaid in 1952, but today we have no trace of A Daughter of the Gods
(1916), her “million dollar movie” lmed on location in Jamaica.
Despite three reissues and Kellerman’s appearance in a “tasteful”
and widely discussed nude scene (both conditions that might have
encouraged the lm’s survival), the lm has vanished.
Cinematic adaptations would tell us much about the impact
of popular plays and novels. Among the missing are Main Street
(1923) and Babbitt (1924), based on the bestsellers by Sinclair Lewis,
America’s rst author to win the Nobel Prize in literature; and
The Beautiful and Damned (1922) and The Great Gatsby (1926), con-
temporary, on-the-spot adaptations of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novels.
Adaptations from the stage fare no better. Brewsters Millions is a
23
In 2011, the EYE Film Instituut Nederland restored Herbert Brenon’s The Spanish
Dancer (1923) from a nitrate print with Dutch titles, a nitrate print with Russian titles
from the Cinémathèque Royale de Belgique, and two 16mm copies of the Kodascope
abridgement. Fitzmaurice’s Bella Donna (1923) and Ernst Lubitsch’s Forbidden Paradise
(1924) exist in their foreign-release versions. There is also a reel of outtakes from The
Woman on Trial (1928) at the Museum of Modern Art.
24
For details on the survival of the lms of Mary Pickford, see Christel Schmidt,
“Preserving Pickford: The Mary Pickford Collection and the Library of Congress,”
The Moving Image 3, no. 1 (Spring 2003): 59–81. Available at http://muse.jhu.edu/
demo/the_moving_image/v003/3.1schmidt.pdf. For background information on the
other female stars, see Greta de Groat’s Unsung Divas of the Silent Screen website for
biographies and lmographies (http://www.stanford.edu/~gdegroat).
Fig. 6: The Mark of Zorro (1920)–
Poster. Douglas Fairbanks
established the popular images of
characters, including Zorrro, that
endure today.
15
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
comedy of inheritance from a 1906 play that has been lmed eight
times since 1914, most recently in 1985. Clearly the story resonates
across the century from our great-grandparents’ time to today, but
three silent versions of Brewsters Millions—a 1914 version with
Edward Abeles, who created the role on stage; a 1921 version with
Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle; and a 1926 version with Bebe Daniels—are
as lost to history as their live theatrical counterpart.
Humorist and commentator Will Rogers was one of the most
well-known and beloved American public gures of the 1920s. He
starred in 16 silent features, of which only 5 survive.
25
Other popu-
lar comedians are even less well represented. One such is Raymond
Grith. Critic Walter Kerr tried to reestablish Grith’s reputation in
the 1970s in his book The Silent Clowns. Kerr judged Grith to be just
as funny, just as talented, and just as important as Charles Chaplin,
Buster Keaton, and Harold Lloyd. Nearly every one of their lms
survived to be seen by later generations. Kerr noted that “one reason
for the neglect of Grith’s lms today is that so little of his output is
available. Of the 9 or 10 starring lms he made between 1925 and the
end of the silent period, only 3 can be seen at the moment; a fourth—
even perhaps a fth—is known to exist but is not yet in museum
circulation. It is dicult to develop a new audience for a man
who is more than half invisible.”
26
History is told by the win-
ners, and for lm history, survival alone can be sucient to
enter the pantheon.
And how much better would we understand media
manipulation if we could see the World War I–preparedness
drama The Battle Cry of Peace (1915), showing an invasion of
the United States by an unnamed (but Teutonic) attacker;
or its complement, the pacist War Brides (1916), in which
widowed mothers protest the war. Moving Picture World ac-
claimed the lm for reaching “a tragic height never before
attained by a moving picture” with a climax “which is prob-
ably the most powerful ever seen on the screen.” How clearly
could be demonstrated the mercurial change in public dis-
course once the United States joined the war, as these lms
were replaced by such unsubtle propaganda lms as The
Kaiser, Beast of Berlin (1918). Extant advertising, still photos,
and reviews can go only so far to communicate their eect. If
we cannot view these lms, we cannot accurately judge their
purpose, their appeal, and their import.
27
For many other titles, sometimes only a tantalizing frag-
ment exists. Only a single reel survives of the only missing
Greta Garbo feature, The Divine Woman (1928). Six of the lms by
director Lois Weber are missing more than half their reels. Even
when a lm does survive with its content intact, its experience can
be substandard because of poor quality or worn elements. The visual
25
Will Rogers also starred in a now-lost British production Tiptoes (1927), opposite
Dorothy Gish.
26
Walter Kerr, The Silent Clowns (New York: Knopf, 1975), 298.
27
Edward Weitzel, “War Brides,” The Moving Picture World (December 2, 1916):
1343–1344.
Fig. 7: War Brides (1916)–
Advertisement from Moving Picture
World, 5 Nov. 1916, p. 1099. Only
reviews and advertisements survive
for this World War I-era lm.
16
David Pierce
beauty of Tod Browning’s West of Zanzibar (1928), with Lon Chaney,
and John S. Robertson’s The Single Standard (1929), with Greta Garbo,
are compromised because they were copied from heavily worn
prints. Beggars of Life (1928), with Wallace Beery and Louise Brooks,
survives only in a single original 16mm copy. Beautifully staged and
photographed lms like Herbert Brenon’s A Kiss for Cinderella (1925),
Roland West’s The Dove (1928), and Raoul Walsh’s The Monkey Talks
(1927) each have one entire, critical reel copied not quite in time that
exists as an oily, splotchy, ickery muddle of decaying and barely
legible images.
Meanwhile, innumerable low-budget westerns and program
pictures exist in immaculate original prints barely used since their
original release.
Methodology, Denitions, and Scope of This Study
Purpose of This Study
Good documentation exists on which American silent feature lms
were produced and released. This study quanties the “what,”
“where,” and “why” of their survival. This report does not examine
which lms have been preserved or restored, or are commercially
available. The focus is strictly on what survives.
This survey was designed to quantify what still exists, whether
the materials originated with an owner or elsewhere, and where the
surviving copies are located—in an archive, a commercial collection,
a nonarchive library, or a private collection. In some cases, based on
distribution catalogs, this study considers the likelihood that copies
exist with the private-collector community. Underlying the study are
some key facts:
American lms were distributed worldwide; copies may be found
anywhere.
Image quality is vitally important for silent lms; the original
production format of 35mm for theatrical releases is the preferred
format.
Many lms survive in alternate editions: abridgements, reis-
sues (with reedited footage, rewritten titles, or added narration),
foreign-release versions (with alternate footage or rewritten titles).
These variants should be documented where possible.
Hundreds of lms were released for nontheatrical showing in
small-gauge formats such as 16mm. Many of these lms are
known to survive only in prints held by private collectors; it is
certain that others survive as well.
The survey was designed to answer ve questions:
1. How many silent feature lms survive?
2. Who holds the surviving lms?
3. How complete are the surviving lms?
4. In what format does the most complete copy survive?
5. Where was the best surviving copy found?
17
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
The data from the survey were then analyzed to develop
statistics that determine:
the percentage of silent features that survive, by format and
completeness;
correlation of survival to year of release;
comparisons of survival rates for lms by major studios and by
major stars and directors; and
the sources of best surviving copies: the important role of rights-
holders in preservation.
Denition of an American Silent Feature Film
After the nickelodeon era, the industry began moving to longer
lms, and some titles, notably The Life of Moses (1909), were rst re-
leased as a series of shorts, with each individual reel the highlight
or “feature” of that day’s program. Later, the reels were combined
and the result was distributed as a stand-alone feature. As a pro-
ducer noted in 1917, “In the majority of cases every lm of more than
three thousand feet in length has recently been termed a feature” as
the term “has been applied largely to the length regardless of
merit.”
28
Program features in the teens were usually ve reels, and by
the 1920s seven reels was more common. Big-budget lms ran
longer to justify their higher rentals. Director Rex Ingram was
one of the few Universal sta directors in the teens who could
deliver on the promise of sensitive titles such as The Chalice of
Sorrow (1916) and The Reward of the Faithless (1917) within the
limitation of a ve-reel running time. A decade later, Ingram’s
production of The Magician (1926), the silent lm that most pre-
gures the monster-horror lms of the early sound period, was
a regular program release at seven reels. Ingram’s epic The Four
Horsemen of the Apocalypse (1921), which captured the impact of
World War I on the generation that lived through it and catapult-
ed Rudolph Valentino to stardom, was 11 reels.
This report relies on the denition of a feature lm devel-
oped by the editors of the American Film Institute Catalog of
Feature Films: “lms of four reels or more, produced in the
United States.”
29
Toward the end of the 1920s, the denition of a silent feature
becomes more problematic. Films were released with synchro-
nized scores of music and eects, and then with talking sequences.
Films were prepared in two versions for American release: silent
28
George K. Spoor, “Standardizing the Abused Word ‘Feature’,” Motion Picture News,
January 20, 1917, 382. Also see W. Stephen Bush, “The Future of the Single Reel,” The
Moving Picture World (April 19, 1913): 256.
29
Patricia King Hanson, ed., The American Film Institute Catalog of Motion Pictures
Produced in the United States. F1. Feature Films, 1911–1920 (Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1988), xv. Despite the title, the catalog includes no features from 1911.
Fig. 8: The Four Horsemen of the
Apocalypse (1921)–Poster. With an 11-
reel running time, the production was
among the longest silent feature lms.
18
David Pierce
(for theaters that had not yet installed sound equipment) and sound
(either all-talking or part-talking with music and sound eects). A
separate, nondialog edition was prepared for foreign markets, either
mute or with a soundtrack of music and eects. This study includes
lms with recorded scores, talking sequences, or both. Titles released
in both all-talking and silent versions are excluded.
30
Historical Period of Study
The list of silent feature lms referenced in this study is derived
from the AFI Catalog of Feature Films, which documents 10,919 fea-
ture lms of American origin released between 1912 and 1930.
31
The
range of years and the number of lms released per year are shown
in Figure 9.
The era of the teens is arguably the period of American cinema
with the most diversity of creative technique and certainly the period
in which the aesthetics of lmmaking underwent major evolution. It
is the period in which the feature lm was born, matured, and ow-
ered. The absence of the majority of the works from these years has
30
The part-talking The Jazz Singer and Lonesome meet the qualications. Not included
are Welcome Danger (1929), with Harold Lloyd; William Wyler’s Hell’s Heroes (1930);
and Coquette (1929), with Mary Pickford—even though these lms exist in two distinct
editions, as all-talking lms and as silent lms. To include these titles would skew the
statistics by also adding hundreds of silent versions of all-talking lms released in
1929, 1930, and 1931. Few of the silent versions of these later lms survive, and most,
such as the silent edition of Dracula (1931), were mute versions of the talkie, with
title cards inserted to cover the spoken dialogue, rather than separately staged and
photographed silent lms.
31
The twenties are covered in Kenneth W. Munden, ed., The American Film Institute
Catalog of Motion Pictures Produced in the United States. F2. Feature lms, 1921–1930
(New York: R.R. Bowker, 1971). The combined catalogs are available at http://www.
a.com/members/catalog. The listing concludes with 1930, the year of the nal
major studio silent releases. This excludes at least eight lms from the 1930s released
with music scores but no narration. These were mostly travelogues, with the notable
exceptions of Charlie Chaplin’s City Lights (1931) and Modern Times (1936).
Fig. 9: Number of U.S. Silent Feature
Films Released, by Year
19
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
skewed our historical perspective. We know well the contributions of
men like D. W. Grith, Cecil B. DeMille, and Thomas H. Ince. Less
well acknowledged, if at all, are the earliest features by women lm-
makers. Three examples, all of which survive, are Cleopatra (1912),
produced by actress Helen Gardner; Eighty Million Women Want?
(1913), a political drama with a cameo appearance by British surag-
ette Emmeline Pankhurst; and From the Manger to the Cross (1913),
lmed on location in the Middle East with a scenario by actress and
screenwriter Gene Gauntier.
The enormous, unexpected success of The Birth of a Nation (1915)
contributed to a rush of investment in the production of longer lms,
with the number of releases peaking in 1917 at nearly 1,000 features.
This increase in production led to an oversupply of product, and the
resulting reduction in rental prices fed the growing numbers of the-
aters and the rapid turnover of programs. Many small-town theaters
presented a program of a feature and shorts on a bill that changed
each day. This booking practice had an inevitable eect upon quality,
as Universal cofounder Pat Powers noted in a letter in 1917:
The number of pictures required by the various exhibitors, so that
they will not be compelled to run the same picture the second
time, no matter how good it might be, forces a great deal of stu
on the market which is not interesting or entertaining. … The lack
of the proper story has forced the picture producer to tie to the
star, with the result that, the star, being exploited in this manner,
naturally walks away with the prots. But, as stated, I have come
to the conclusion that all things adjust themselves in time, and I
presume the moving picture business will be no exception.
32
One impact of that adjustment was that “lm companies, which
had been founded in virtually every state of the Union, from Maine
to Florida, from Ithaca to Oregon, gravitated slowly but surely to
Los Angeles,” Jan-Christopher Horak wrote. “In Hollywood lm
producers increasingly nanced their operations through loans from
distributors and/or the owners of massive chains of movie theaters,
forcing lm producers to relinquish some of their independence.”
33
Film production and theater ownership consolidated in an oligopoly
of a small number of large companies, which could then reduce out-
put and charge higher prices on fewer, more protable, lms.
The 192122 national recession caused the bankruptcy of
many undercapitalized rms, and output fell again. Production
hit bottom in 1923, with fewer than 600 features, then gradually
rose with the growth of Hollywood’s Poverty Row, the gurative
home of very low-budget producers. The large companies tended
to make polished lms with budgets ranging between $50,000 and
32
P. A. Powers to H. R. Wright, February 1, 1917. Box 13, Harry and Roy Aitken
Papers, Wisconsin Historical Society Archives. Thanks to Eric Hoyt for sharing his
research in this collection.
33
Jan-Christopher Horak, “Good Morning, Babylon: Maurice Tourneur’s Battle
Against the Studio System,” Image 31, no. 2 (September 1988): 1. Available at http://
image.eastmanhouse.org/les/GEH_1988_31_02.pdf.
20
David Pierce
$250,000; in 1926, Fox produced 47 features. The low-budget Buck
Jones westerns cost $75,000 each; almost everything else was at or
under $200,000, and their one special—John Ford’s Three Bad Men
had a production cost of $497,928. The Poverty Row contingent
specialized in westerns and melodramas intended for rural and
small-town theaters, shot in ve days or less on a shoestring. “One
gentleman produced thirty-six full-length photodramas on the Row
in a period of three years,” the Saturday Evening Post reported, “his
cheapest costing $3,800 and his most expensive $12,000 … wherein
the director smashed up three secondhand planes and had to pay
for them.”
34
The silent era came to an abrupt end with the transition to
sound in the late 1920s. The end was near when The Jazz Singer pre-
miered on October 6, 1927. It is instructive to see how the largest
studio, MGM, dealt with the transition. MGM’s silent feature White
Shadows in the South Seas, lmed under extraordinary circumstances
on location, was outtted with the studio’s rst musical soundtrack
and released in the summer of 1928 as its rst sound release.
As White Shadows went into wide release in November, the
studio’s rst part-talkie, the gangster drama Alias Jimmy
Valentine, opened in New York. In May 1929, MGM’s nal
lm without a soundtrack opened. By October, The Mysterious
Island (a lumbering, troubled investment that had been in
production for three years under as many directors) had a
lone talking sequence grafted onto it, permitting it to be ad-
vertised as a “part-talkie.” One month later, MGM outtted
the last of its nondialog releases, The Kiss, with Greta Garbo,
with a recorded-music score. In February 1930, Anna Christie
with Garbo opened with an advertising campaign declaring,
“Garbo Talks!,” and she did, in both English and German ver-
sions. In less than two years, American silent lms had moved from
rst-run, internationally friendly, to obsolete.
Sources of Data
Treasures from the Film Archives, published by the FIAF, is the primary
source of information regarding silent lm survival in the archival
community. FIAF member archives from every country contributed
holdings information on the silent features and short lms in their
collections. Some archives acknowledge only that a title is held in
their collection, while others provide details such as format (35mm,
16mm), and whether their holdings are nitrate or safety, print or
negative, and complete or incomplete. Information on American
silent features was received for Treasures from the Film Archives from
37 of FIAF’s more than 150 members, including most of the ar-
chives known to have large collections of American lms. (See the
34
Frank Condon, “Poverty Row,” Saturday Evening Post, August 25, 1934, 30.
Fig. 10: Three Bad Men (1926)–Lobby
Card. With a production cost of
nearly $500,000, Three Bad Men
was among the most expensive
silent lms made.
21
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Appendix for a list of participating archives).
35
The FIAF information has been supplemented by extensive dis-
cussions with each American archive, a limited amount of informa-
tion from corporations and library collections that possess materials,
and information on the holdings of private collectors in the United
States and Great Britain. Major additions include the David Bradley
collection at the Lilly Library at Indiana University, the Blackhawk
collection held at the Academy Film Archive, and the MGM lm
library, now part of Turner Entertainment at Warner Bros., with the
surviving nitrate lm elements held at the George Eastman House.
Findings
Most American Silent Feature Films Are Lost
There is seemingly no rhyme or reason why certain lms survived,
as neither quality nor critical reputation determined their fates. The
driving forces that retained and disposed of these lms were typical
of the industry that made them—economic, not artistic. With these
factors working against them, plus the vulnerability of nitrate lm
stock to re and deterioration, it is remarkable that any silent lms
survive.
Only 14% of American silent feature lms (1,575 of 10,919
titles) survive as originally released in complete 35mm copies.
Another 11% (1,174) also survive in complete form, but in less-
than-ideal editions—foreign-release versions or small-gauge
formats such as 16mm.
Our American silent lm heritage was saved from the brink of
extinction by lm archives that acquired key studio releases while
the negatives still existed and small companies run by lm enthu-
siasts willing to invest in abandoned lms whose copyrights had
lapsed and could legally be distributed. Film collectors rescued
prints, orphan or otherwise, because it was the only way to see the
lms that interested them.
Most of the prints acquired from the major studios by the
Museum of Modern Art and George Eastman House, from the
1930s through the 1950s, became the only copies in existence by
the mid-1960s, as the studios’ older copies deteriorated in their
vaults.
35
Treasures of the Film Archives describes the holdings of FIAF member archives for
lms of the silent era. This includes all countries, ction and nonction, features,
and shorts. In general, it is an indication of holdings, not whether a copy is available
for research viewing or loan. For information on the commercial edition, licensed
by Chadwyck-Healey, see http://af.chadwyck.com/marketing/about.jsp. For the
CD-ROM version, available for sale to individuals, see http://www.afnet.org/uk/
publications/fdbo_content.html.
22
David Pierce
Only one owner, MGM, saw long-term value in its entire library.
While that studio certainly had losses resulting from decomposing
nitrate, MGM never participated in the wholesale destruction of ma-
terial dictated, for example, by the new management of Universal-
International that caused the willful disposal of nearly its entire
remaining silent catalog in 1948. Nor had MGM experienced the
near-total loss of its silent and early sound negatives by re as expe-
rienced by Warner Bros. and Twentieth Century-Fox in the 1930s.
MGM preserved, at the corporation’s expense, 113 silent fea-
tures produced or distributed by MGM and its predecessor
companies Metro Pictures, Goldwyn Pictures, and Louis B.
Mayer Productions. Starting in the 1930s, MGM also gave
prints or negatives for 120 silent feature lms to various
American archives, primarily George Eastman House.
Beginning in the 1960s, under the leadership of studio opera-
tions manager Raymond Klune and his successor, Roger Mayer,
MGM invested in the preservation of those titles still in existence. In
his acceptance speech for the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award at
the Academy Awards in 2005, Roger Mayer noted that “as for lm
preservation, I must give credit to the six board chairmen and seven
production heads who either backed our endeavors or weren’t quite
sure what we were doing so let it happen anyway. And then came
Ted Turner and his cohorts in Atlanta, who understood the impor-
tance of all this and kept it going when funds were pretty short.”
36
Today, the silent lm output of the MGM studio (1924–1929) is
the most comprehensive collection of its pre-sound output of any
Hollywood producer. Other owners were, at best, indierent. If ad-
ditional major studio lms survive, it is because of the preservation
eorts of archives working in cooperation with rights-holders and
private collectors.
The survival rate of silent lms produced by MGM is 68%, by
far the highest of any studio.
Few silent feature lms survive in complete, pristine condi-
tion. About 175 titles, including titles donated to archives by MGM,
Paramount, RKO, Universal, and Warner Bros., survive at least par-
tially in original nitrate camera negative (although these are seldom
the lms enthusiasts would most like to see).
36
Roger Mayer, acceptance speech for the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award, 2004
(77th) Academy Awards, Kodak Theatre, February 27, 2005. Available at http://www.
oscars.org/research-preservation/resources-databases.
23
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Another 5% of American silent feature lms (562 of 10,919
titles) survive in incomplete form, missing at least a reel of
the original footage, in formats ranging from 35mm down to
abridged 9.5mm home library prints. Many important titles are
incomplete.
The major studios generally stored negatives on the East Coast,
where the release prints were manufactured. Prints were more likely
to survive on the West Coast, where studio library prints were kept
for screenings or viewing for potential remake. Most existing lms,
including studio titles, survived only as unique nitrate prints, some-
times heavily worn and often incomplete. It is rare to nd major stu-
dio lms in private collections because the studios kept tight control
of their prints.
Almost all titles found overseas are prints, along with a few
foreign-release negatives found abandoned in lm labs.
Small producers held their negatives, often in buildings
they owned or in other low-cost storage. D. W. Grith, Douglas
Fairbanks, William S. Hart, and the corporate successors to Biograph
and Edison donated their entire lm libraries to the Museum of
Modern Art between 1938 and 1941. In several cases, negatives and
prints were already in an advanced state of decay upon receipt.
Later, large-scale donations, this time to the AFI Collection at the
Library of Congress, included the Thomas H. Ince lms in 1971
from the producer’s heirs, and the Marion Davies/Cosmopolitan
Productions preprint material in 1972 from the actress’s estate.
Fig. 11: The Patsy (1928)–Lobby Card.
The estate of actress and producer
Marion Davies donated prints and
negatives of her lms to the Library
of Congress in 1972.
24
David Pierce
Fig. 12: Denitions and Categories of Film Completeness, with Examples
Definition
Examples from the film career
of Lon Chaney
COMPLETE
The lm is complete
or missing less than
one reel
Released by the
Universal Show-
at-Home Library
ONE REEL
MISSING
Missing exactly
one reel
Missing reel four
NOT
COMPLETE
Missing two or
more reels
Cut to 35 minutes
for the French
9.5mm home movie
market
FRAGMENT
One reel or less
survives
Five minutes of
the lm survive
LOST
No copies are
known to survive
Lost
25
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Not All Surviving Films Are Complete
Finding copies of missing lms has always been a race against time.
Films are lost to res nearly every year, and to decomposition every
day. For the purposes of this report, “completeness” is divided into
ve categories, depending on how much of a lm survives, as de-
tailed in Figure 12.
Of the 3,311 American silent feature lms released between 1912
and 1930 that survive in some form, 25% (2,749 out of 10,919 titles)
survive in complete form. For the purposes of this study, if a lm is
missing less than a reel of footage, it counts as complete. Many lms
have short sections missing (most frequently at the beginning and
end of reels, or censor cuts). Without a synchronized soundtrack to
make those jump cuts obvious, these gaps often have minimal eect
upon the lm’s narrative logic and entertainment value. In addition,
some of the biggest studio productions were initially released as re-
served-seat road show attractions, followed by a shortened version in
a general release a year later. Many of these titles survive only in their
general-release versions, with The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923)
reduced from 12 reels to 10, and The Trail of ’98 (1928), MGM’s epic of
the Klondike gold rush, 40 minutes shorter than the 127-minute pre-
miere. Rather than untangle this web, this report considers any sur-
viving copy that matches an original-release edition to be complete.
Another 562 (17% of the surviving titles and 5% of total produc-
tion) of the silent feature lms survive in incomplete form. At least
151 titles survive in versions that have one reel missing. The loss of
a reel does not generally aect the entertainment value, and these
lms are still shown to the public and released on DVD. Another
275 titles survive in versions that are not complete (i.e., missing two
or more reels). This includes the lms that survive only in 9.5mm
abridgements and many of the Kodascope home library releases
where footage was eliminated to reduce the running time. Finally,
there are 136 conrmed fragments for which one reel or less sur-
vives. There are probably many more odd reels in collections, un-
identied and uncataloged.
37
Archives have generally retained incomplete copies and re-
moved decomposition from each roll upon inspection, saving the
remainder. A commercial owner was more likely to junk any title
that was incomplete as having no commercial value (again, the ex-
ception to the rule was MGM, which preserved at least 11 incomplete
features).
Even an incomplete surviving copy is far from worthless. Time
and again, the preservation of incomplete copies and fragments has
been the prelude to restoration, as an incomplete local copy has fre-
quently been augmented by footage from second and third copies
discovered elsewhere.
37
Information on completeness is generally accurate for American archives and some
foreign holdings. Unless I had evidence otherwise, all foreign holdings were assumed
to be complete. The practice varies across archives; some institutions submit all titles,
including those they hold only in fragments, while others provide information only
when they hold complete prints. Some of the lms that are not complete (i.e., missing
one reel but satisfactory for commercial release) include Sadie Thompson (1928), Laugh,
Clown, Laugh (1928), and Bardelys the Magnicent (1926).
26
David Pierce
Figure 13 illustrates that one-quarter of the surveyed titles are
essentially complete, with another 5% surviving in varying degrees
of completeness.
Films Survive in Different Formats
The Preferred Edition is the 35mm Domestic-Release Version
Of the 2,749 lms that survive in complete form, about 2,343 exist
in the 35mm format. This makes it possible to view them in nearly
their original pictorial quality. During the silent era, every release
print had remarkable sharpness, denition, and shadow detail be-
cause each print was made directly from the rst-generation camera
negative.
Those 2,343 35mm titles are of two types: 67% survive in their
original domestic-release version as shown to American audiences,
and 33% (768) survive only in foreign-release editions. By the mid-
teens, most silent features were photographed twice, so that a second
negative could be sent to Europe to manufacture prints locally for
the foreign markets. This second negative roughly matched the do-
mestic negative and was usually assembled from a combination of
footage taken by a second camera and of alternate takes. Where both
versions survive and can be compared, the foreign version is always
the lesser version—not an exact representation of the original, but a
close replica, often with dierent shots, performances, and editing.
When considering authenticity, these foreign-release versions
of American silent features should be treated as a text, not the text.
The rst published version of Shakespeare’s Hamlet was a quarto,
a pirated printing, probably transcribed from memory by an actor.
The dialogue, “To be, or not be, I there’s the point,” captured the con-
tent, but not the art and grace, of the authorized text we have come
to know. As Stuart Kelly noted in his survey of lost books, “Slips
Fig. 13: American Silent Feature
Film Survival, by Categories of
Completeness
27
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Most existing lms, including studio titles,
survived only as unique nitrate prints, sometimes
heavily worn and often incomplete.
and mishearing, presumptions and anticipations typify the hast-
ily assembled bad quarto,” and the introduction to the authorized
folio edition, published after Shakespeare’s death, warned against
“copies, maimed and deformed by frauds and stealths of injurious
impostors.”
38
Hamlet was subsequently published in the rst folio of
Shakespeare’s works, allowing comparison of the authentic text
to the lesser copy. Similar analysis is essential when viewing lms
that survive in multiple versions. For example, the American- and
European-release versions of Paul Leni’s The Cat and the Canary
(1927) reveal major dierences. All but three shots in the lm showed
dierent performances, with the shots in the European print of-
ten appearing to be rehearsal footage. The two versions represent,
Christopher Bird wrote, “the dierence between a smooth, owing,
impeccably paced lm (the American version), and a abby, jarring
lm (the European version).”
39
Those lms that survive as both foreign-release versions in
35mm and American-release editions in 16mm present a dicult
choice between the superior image quality of 35mm and the au-
thenticity of the 16mm copy for shot choice, editing, and titles. In
trying to establish a hierarchy of authenticity for silent lms, many
archivists believe that the superior image quality of 35mm for public
performance—even of the foreign version—is preferable to a 16mm
copy of the American release. For historical analysis, the domestic-re-
lease version represents the most accurate record of the intent of the
lmmakers and what American audiences viewed at the time. Often
the two are used in tandem, with the 16mm copy used as a guide to
restoration for the 35mm foreign-release version.
Categorizing the various surviving versions has required draw-
ing ne distinctions to determine the most appropriate category for
each lm. This report considers the best edition to be a 35mm copy
of the original American-release edition. The foreign-release ver-
sion in 35mm is considered next, followed by a small-gauge print
of the original American-release version. As expected, the larger
image size is preferred over small-gauge prints, with copies of the
38
Stuart Kelly, Book of Lost Books: An Incomplete History of All the Great Books You’ll Never
Read (New York: Random House, 2006), 141.
39
Christopher Bird, “’Europe Ain’t Gonna See This Scene!’: Working with Variant Versions
in Photoplay Productions’ Restoration of The Cat and the Canary,” The Moving Image
9, no. 2 (Fall 2009): 149–163. Photoplay had access to two prints, each from dierent
sources of the domestic and foreign versions of the lm, so the aws could be
identied to the release version, rather than to the idiosyncrasies of a particular print.
28
David Pierce
File Format Definitions Examples
35mm domestic
release version
Most surviving
MGM lms exist
in their original re-
lease version.
35mm foreign release
version (“B” negative)
A few MGM lms
survive only in
copies distrib-
uted in the United
Kingdom in part-
nership with exhib-
itor William Jury.
28mm Pathéscope
format
Douglas Fairbanks
starred in a series of
popular light come-
dies. The Americano
(1917) survives only
in 28mm.
16mm
Manhandled (1924)
exists only in a
16mm Kodascope
home library print,
cut from seven to
ve reels.
9.5mm
Station Content
(1918) with Gloria
Swanson survives
only in a 9.5mm
abridgement.
8mm
Partners Again
(1926) survives only
in 8mm.
Fig. 14: Guide to Major Film Distribution Formats
29
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
original-release version in various small-gauge widths of 28mm,
16mm, 9.5mm, and 8mm following. Images of each format are pre-
sented with examples in Figure 14.
Many Films Survive Only in Small-Gauge Formats
Of the 2,749 silent features that survive in complete form, 406 exist
only in formats other than 35mm—small-gauge format 28mm and
16mm prints. Even more titles survive as abridged versions in 16 and
9.5mm copies. After lms had exhausted their theatrical value, many
titles were oered in these smaller-size lm formats for nontheatrical
showings in schools, institutions, and homes.
Schools were seldom equipped to show nitrate prints. Although
some educational titles were released on 35mm diacetate (nonam-
mable) lm stock, the risk of mistakenly showing 35mm nitrate lm
was too great. Because a nitrate lm re could spread from the pro-
jector to an auditorium in seconds, re laws required an enclosed,
reproof projection booth and a trained projectionist, which meant
that most institutions showed no lms at all. The 28mm format,
called “the safety standard,” proved to be no cheaper than 35mm,
but it was suciently incompatible to eliminate the possibility of a
projectionist threading up a nitrate print by mistake. Introduced in
1923, 16mm successfully addressed the shortcomings of the 28mm
format. Another home format, 9.5mm, was introduced in 1922, fol-
lowed by 8mm in 1932. The later formats were less expensive and
cheaper to ship, and gave a satisfactory image on a small screen.
28mm. At least 72 American silent features were released in
28mm, mostly titles from the teens. Of these, 39 survive only in
the 28mm format. Another 13 titles were released in these edi-
tions, but 28mm prints have yet to be located (one exists in a 16mm
Kodascope edition), so they must be considered lost. Another 21
titles also survive in 35mm.
40
The 28mm prints that do survive ll
important gaps in the nitrate record. One
of the most revered pictorialists of the
period is director Maurice Tourneur, who
came to the United States from France in
1914 and worked at studios in Fort Lee,
New Jersey. Tourneur was renowned for
the visual qualities of his lms—the sets
or landscape carefully chosen, the camera
in the ideal place, and the performances
relaxed and natural. In 1916, Photoplay
magazine wrote “in the all too short list
of great directors that the wonderful new
art has produced, the name of Maurice
Tourneur must be given a distinctive
place.” But we can conrm this today only
40
There were two slightly dierent 28mm formats, but they are treated as one for the
purposes of this report.
Fig. 15: Watching Small-Gauge
Films at Home, from Descriptive
Catalogue of Kodascope Library
16mm Motion Pictures: Sixth Edition
(1936). Many silent lms survive only
in small-gauge editions created for
showing in homes and schools.
30
David Pierce
because three of his rst seven American lms survive
in 28mm prints: The Wishing Ring (1914), The Cub, and
Trilby (both 1915).
41
Douglas Fairbanks was a prolic actor in the teens.
Richard Corliss called Fairbanks’ screen character “a
movie vision of young America on the ascendance in
the decade after World War I,” characterizing him as
“half-Tom Sawyer, half-Theodore Roosevelt.” Seven of
his lms for Triangle were released in 28mm. Five of
those delightful light comedies survive only in those
28mm copies: The Lamb (1915), His Picture in the Papers,
Reggie Mixes In, American Aristocracy (all 1916), and The
Americano (1917).
42
While the popularity of the format peaked in the
late teens, 28mm releases continued through the silent
era. The last known release in that format is the low-
budget Jacqueline Logan romance for Tiany, One Hour
of Love (1927), directed by Robert Florey.
16mm. At least 365 titles—11% of the 3,311 features
that exist in some form—survive only in 16mm edi-
tions. Eastman Kodak introduced this popular format
in 1923 for home and institutional users, supported by
a library of entertainment and educational lms avail-
able for rental. While the 28mm libraries were largely
limited to lms from companies that had gone out of
business, Kodak ensured that most of the major produc-
ers participated. The Kodascope rental libraries oered
134 American features including 16mm versions of the
most popular 28mm titles. The majority of Kodascope
oerings were from the mid-1920s and from major studios: DeMille,
First National, Fox, Paramount, and Warner Bros., the companies
that later became RKO and Columbia, as well as smaller producers
and independents.
43
Of the 134 American features released by Kodascope, 30 also
survive in 35mm domestic- or foreign-release versions and 9 were
released in 28mm. But for 77 titles, these Kodascope prints repre-
sent the only known surviving copies. Another 15 titles released
by Kodascope and not yet held by archives may survive in private
collections.
Many Kodascope titles were professionally abridged, often from
seven reels to ve, to reduce the running time to about an hour.
Printed from 35mm duplicating negatives, these lms had relatively
41
“Tourneur—Of Paris and Fort Lee, His Methods and His Artistic History,” Photoplay,
January 1916, 139–140. Reprinted in Richard Koszarski, Fort Lee: The Film Town (Rome:
John Libbey Publishing, 2004), 171.
42
Richard Corliss, “The King of Hollywood,” Time, June 17, 1996. Available at http://
www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,984717,00.html. The two Fairbanks
titles released in 28mm that also survive in 35mm are Flirting with Fate (1915) and The
Matrimaniac (1916).
43
David Pierce, “Silent Movies and the Kodascope Libraries,” American
Cinematographer, January 1989, 36–40. MGM and United Artists were the only major
companies that did not provide at least a few titles.
Fig. 16: Advertisement for
Kodascope Libraries, from 1000
and One: The Blue Book of Non-
Theatrical Films, 1936. Eastman
Kodak established the 16mm format
in 1923 and offered hundreds of lms
for rental through their Kodascope
Libraries subsidiary.
31
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
good image quality. From the 1920s through the 1960s, these were
the silent features most widely available to schools and libraries.
Films surviving only in Kodascope editions include lms with strong
female characters, including Allan Dwan’s Manhandled (1924), with
Gloria Swanson as a shop girl with aspirations; The Forbidden City
(1918), with Norma Talmadge as a Chinese-American torn between
both cultures; and Ella Cinders (1926), with Colleen Moore as a small-
town Cinderella who wins a chance to go to Hollywood.
Kodascope also had its share of action titles, ranging from
Paramount’s big-budget historical western The Covered Wagon (1923)
and its follow-up The Pony Express (1925), to the austere The Return of
Draw Egan (1916), with William S. Hart. Five titles starred the ever-
popular Rin-Tin-Tin, including one of his best, The Lighthouse by the
Sea (1924), with the famous German Shepherd coming to the rescue
of a blind, aging lighthouse keeper. A perennial favorite was a ve-
reel condensation of First National’s The Lost World (1925), an adven-
ture lm about explorers who visit a land of dinosaurs; it was the
only edition available until a late-1990s restoration.
Following the successful launch of 16mm, several U.S. studios
began selling their titles directly to camera stores and rental libraries
across the country. Columbia Pictures oered many, including sev-
eral directed by Frank Capra. Among these were his rst at the stu-
dio, the charming That Certain Thing (1928), and The Power of the Press
(1928), with Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. The estate of producer Thomas
W
e Americans (1928) is a drama of immigration
and ethnic assimilation, a special interest of
Universal’s German immigrant founder Carl
Laemmle. In the lm, director Edward Sloman tells the
interwoven story of three families—Russian, German,
and Italian—who come to America at the turn of the
century.
“It is a tragedy that Universal allowed their silent lms
to rot or burn,” wrote Kevin Brownlow. “We Americans
would today be of immense historical importance.” The
studio had the full cooperation of the government, so
the production company lmed on location on a ship in
quarantine at the Statue of Liberty and documented the
immigration process at Ellis Island.
i
When Universal destroyed its remaining silent negatives
in 1948, 17 titles were held back, either because of their
importance to studio history or potential remake value.
We Americans was one of the titles given a pardon from
execution, but unfortunately the negative deteriorated
before the studio gave its remaining silent nitrate lm to
the Library of Congress more than 20 years later.
ii
Photoplay highlighted one scene, a war sequence that
“gives a motive for the high spot of the picture. Mrs.
Levine, going to night school, has mastered enough Eng-
lish to read to the class the Gettysburg Address. As she
reads the closing words ... ‘and they have not died in
vain,’ she is handed the telegram carrying the news of
her son’s death overseas. A very tense moment beauti-
fully handled.”
iii
i
Kevin Brownlow, Behind the Mask of Innocence: Sex, Violence,
Crime: Films of Social Conscience in the Silent Era (New York:
Knopf, 1990), 416.
ii
F. T. Murray, Manager, Branch Operations, Universal Film
Exchanges, Inc., to I. Stolzer, Bound Brook, NJ, April 27, 1948.
Memo courtesy of Richard Koszarski.
iii
“The Shadow Stage: We Americans,” Photoplay, May 1928, 53.
CASE STUDY
A Lost Classic Once Released in 16mm
32
David Pierce
H. Ince oered six titles through the Bell and Howell Filmo Library,
including Soul of the Beast (1923).
Pathé oered dozens of features, including several starring
popular comedians who had recently transitioned from shorts to
features. They included Spuds (1927), a World War I comedy directed
by star Larry Semon; and Horse Shoes (1927), with Monty Banks. The
latter was directed by Clyde Bruckman, who had just codirected The
General (1927) with Buster Keaton. Banks displays a knock-about
charm that doesn’t quite have the appeal of his contemporary, the
all-American Harold Lloyd, but he does have an equal willingness to
please.
If these studios chose to squeeze every dollar out of fallow in-
ventory, consider the plight of small independent producers who
W
hile Universal had mostly second-tier stars un-
der contract, several major directors emerged
from the studio in the 1920s. For each direc-
tor, key titles from his Universal period survive only as
Show-at-Home prints.
Clarence Brown served his apprenticeship at Universal
before becoming Greta Garbo’s favorite director. His ve
lms for the studio from 1923 to 1925 survive in 16mm,
with one also surviving in a somewhat dierent French
35mm print. These include fascinating variations on the
standard romantic triangle, rst with Smouldering Fires.
Pauline Frederick’s performance as a middle-aged busi-
nesswoman who discovers love for the rst time, only to
gradually realize that the man prefers her younger sister
(Laura La Plante), is immensely moving. Brown further
explored the themes of sacrice and lost opportunity in
The Goose Woman, with Louise Dresser and Constance
Bennett, earning him the assignment to direct Rudolph
Valentino in The Eagle (1925).
Erich von Stroheim was the rst important director to
emerge from Universal, and three of his four lms as di-
rector for the studio survive. His nal lm for the studio,
Merry-Go-Round (1923), set in a re-creation of his native
Vienna, survives only in 16mm. Blind Husbands (1919)
and Foolish Wives (1922) survive in 35mm because the
Museum of Modern Art requested 35mm prints from the
studio in 1941 and 1936, respectively. Stroheim’s inter-
mediate production, The Devil’s Passkey (1920), met the
fate of most Universal productions; the negative was de-
stroyed, no 35mm prints survive, and no Show-at-Home
print has been located.
i
William Wyler came to the United States from Germany
in 1921. Family ties got him a minor job at Universal, but
talent led to his rise: directing two-reel westerns in 1925,
then feature westerns, and nally dramas and comedies.
A completely forgotten lm, The Shakedown (1929), reap-
peared in 1998 at the Cinefest lm festival in Syracuse,
New York, in a fragile Show-at-Home print borrowed
from a collector. The plot, which involves a boxer who
has to look after a young boy, is made with condence
and style, and a deep-focus shot in a café looks ahead to
Wyler’s classics of the 1930s. Critic Leonard Maltin at-
tended that rst public screening in modern times, and
wrote that “this formulaic but highly entertaining yarn
about con artists who run a boxing racket played like
gangbusters, and it was plain to see that Wyler was al-
ready feeling his oats as a lmmaker, peppering the ac-
tion with moving-camera and even point-of-view cam-
era shots (one on a huge crane lifting leading man James
Murray to the top of an oil derrick).”
ii
CASE STUDY
Directors and 16mm
i
The print of Blind Husbands acquired by the Museum of Modern
Art is the 1924 reissue edition, and Foolish Wives is an edition
reedited in 1928 for a planned reissue. Richard Koszarski, Von:
The Life and Films of Erich von Stroheim (New York: Limelight
Editions, 2001), 53, 95.
ii
Leonard Maltin, “Silent Films Live Again!,” Leonard Maltin’s
Movie Crazy, July 27, 2010; http://blogs.indiewire.com/
leonardmaltin/archives/silent_lms_live_again/. The Shakedown
and another beautiful Universal late silent lm, Edward Sloman’s
The Girl on the Barge (1929), were shown by William K. Everson
in 1962. He noted that “the two prints are being brought down
to our show tonight, and will be taken away immediately
afterwards”; http://www.nyu.edu/projects/wke/notes/titles/
shakedown.htm. The two lms were untraced until 1998. The
Italian-release version of The Shakedown with music score, titled
Clem Bizzarro Monello, exists at Fondazione Cineteca Italiana.
33
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
could not overlook any source of revenue. A large proportion of sur-
viving silent features are program pictures, because the lms were
rst sold on a states-rights basis to regional lm distributors, and
then in 16mm to local lm distributors and camera stores. Producer
Denver Dixon had made several series of Art Mix westerns, starring
a Tom Mix look-alike. The president of the company was an Arthur
J. Mix, who Dixon found in the Los Angeles phone directory. In 1928,
Dixon (real name Victor Adamson), his wife, and his cameraman
drove to Oregon, promoted production funding from local business-
persons, and lmed The Old Oregon Trail, a very low-budget western
epic. “Spectacular covered-wagon scenes and beautiful locations
provided the backdrop for this story of the settling of Oregon,” Sam
Sherman wrote. Like many other independent productions, the lm
survives only in 16mm.
44
Even more titles were released in 16mm by Universal’s Show-
at-Home library division. Universal was a minor studio in the 1920s,
producing a few big pictures each year and getting by on program
lms. Light comedies with Reginald Denny and westerns with Hoot
Gibson were popular with exhibitors in small towns, where the com-
pany’s lms were most popular.
Because most Universal features were lost in res or destroyed
by the studio in 1948, we would know little about the output of this
studio without the Show-at-Home prints. At least 214 silent Universal
features were oered by Show-at-Home. Ninety-one have been located
and are the only surviving copies. (Another 25 Universal titles released
by Show-at-Home also survive in better-quality 35mm copies.)
An additional 61 Universal titles are listed in 16mm rental cata-
logs from the 1930s and 1940s. These titles are not held by any ar-
chives, but collectors may have prints that would allow these lms to
be recovered.
45
George Eastman House conducted a worldwide search for
Kodascope prints in the 1950s. Although the Kodascope Libraries in
the United States closed in 1939, some overseas branches were still in
operation at that time. This resulted in the acquisition of 565 features
and shorts from Kodak Pathé, Kodak Madrid, Kodak Portugal, and
Kodak Rochester, along with some 35mm printing negatives found
in storage at Kodak. Eastman House Curator James Card acquired
Show-at-Home prints from rental libraries that were closing out their
44
Sam Sherman, “’Go Independent, Young Man’: The Maverick Producers,” in Don
Millers Hollywood Corral, eds. Packy Smith and Ed Hulse (Burbank: Riverwood Press,
1993), 311.
45
An additional 33 titles were silent editions of all-talking lms and outside the scope
of this report.
A large proportion of surviving silent
features are program pictures.
34
David Pierce
old inventories, acquiring 24 features and shorts from Chicago’s
Ideal Pictures in 1954.
46
16mm Preservation. In the 1940s and 1950s, archives copied
some lms only in 16mm. Cost was sometimes a factor, along with
a rationale that the less expensive small-gauge was sucient to cap-
ture the content if not the full image quality of the original. Films
preserved in this way include 23 produced by Thomas Edison; 7
Mary Pickford features, including her Tess of the Storm Country (1922);
6 features starring William S. Hart; and Barbed Wire (1927), Pola
Negri’s nest American lm.
Sometimes lms were copied in 16mm by rights-holders be-
cause that format was sucient for nontheatrical or television use.
Eighteen lms from independent producer Thomas H. Ince were
prepared for broadcast in the late 1940s, including two dramas
starring Louise Glaum as the ultimate vamp—Sex and The Leopard
Woman (both 1920). As archivist David Shepard noted, television
wasn’t interested and “nothing could have seemed less interesting
or more irrelevant than these lms. Who in 1950 would be interested
by Dangerous Hours, a 1920 melodrama of the rst ‘Red scare’ …
The second Red scare with characters like Senator Joseph McCarthy
made better drama.” But many Ince lms were preserved in the
process.
47
As the original 28-year copyright term expired for many silent
lms, distributors began oering 16 and 8mm prints for sale to
schools, libraries, and private collectors. These companies would
select (and by copying, preserve) only the titles in the public domain.
When oered old nitrate prints for potential distribution, the rst
action for nontheatrical distributor Blackhawk Films was to check
the copyright status. According to Blackhawk’s company policy,
“[We] hold up any attempt to copy or announce for release
until we have the report back from the Copyright Oce
indicating that the word is ‘no renewal found.’ Then, and
only then, do we get to work and make the conversion.”
48
The company made 16mm negatives for its purposes, and
passed the nitrate to archives.
9.5mm. In Europe, the home market was dominated by
the Pathé 9.5mm format. Beginning in 1922, the company
released numerous features in abridged versions of about
35 minutes. None of these releases is complete, and the
small image does not do justice to the quality of the original
photography; nonetheless, they do provide a record and
a sample of the original work. Prints were prepared with
English, French, German, and Spanish intertitles, though
not every lm was released in each market.
46
James Card to author. Also “The Museum’s Collections,” Image 14, no. 5/6
(December 1971): 4. Available at http://image.eastmanhouse.org/.
47
David Shepard, “Thomas Ince,” in The American Film Heritage, ed. Kathleen Karr
(Washington, DC: Acropolis Books, 1972), 46.
48
Kent D. Eastin, “Blackhawk Newsreel: How Blackhawk Acquires Distribution Rights
to Its Product,” Blackhawk Bulletin, B-267, September 1975, 75.
Fig. 17: Pathéscope Reels. The
9.5mm format was popular in
Europe, and Pathé distributed
abridged versions of Hollywood lms
across the continent.
35
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Pathéscope released innumerable Hollywood shorts and features
on 9.5mm in Europe. These were always abridged versions, renamed
for the home market, leading to years of research by British lm col-
lectors. For example, Vitagraph’s seven-reel Black Beauty (1921) was
released in 35-minute editions, retitled Black Bess, with the appropri-
ate language intertitles for the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and
Germany.
Of the 129 American silent features released in abridged versions
on 9.5mm, at least 56 exist in no other form. These include two dozen
lms produced by Vitagraph, seven from Warner Bros., a dozen from
Triangle, six from MGM, numerous independent lms, and, not
surprisingly, dozens from parent company Pathé, including numer-
ous Mack Sennett and Hal Roach short comedies and many Pathé
features.
Pathé titles included A Damsel in Distress (1919), an adaptation of
the novel by P. G. Wodehouse, better known for the 1937 RKO
remake with Fred Astaire and Joan Fontaine. The Warner Bros. lms
included three Rin-Tin-Tin titles. Among the independent lms are
Edward H. Grith’s White Mice (1926), with Jacqueline Logan and
William Powell, based on the Richard Harding Davis novel of South
American intrigue.
One of the most interesting lms to survive as a truncated 9.5mm
release is the screen adaptation of Booth Tarkington’s 1918 Pulitzer
Prize–winning novel The Magnicent Ambersons, released to theaters in
1925 as Pampered Youth and to the 9.5mm market as Two to One. There
is no evidence that Orson Welles saw the earlier version, or even the
25-minute 9.5mm edition, though Photoplay identied the primary nar-
rative weakness in both versions as “a main street story of a spoiled,
snobbish, high handed young man.” While exhibitors still criticized
the lm for lack of action, William K. Everson noted that the lm con-
cludes with “an extremely well-staged re sequence which brings the
lm to a traditional happy ending via the route of thrill and spectacle,
somewhat at odds with both the novel and Orson Welles’ remake.”
49
8mm. Many of the most popular 16mm releases were reissued
when Kodak introduced the 8mm format in 1932. Although the im-
age size is only one quarter of 16mm, the quality of the prints was so
high that 8mm was perfectly satisfactory for home use. All but two
of the 8mm releases also survive in 16mm. One 8mm example, never
49
William K. Everson, Pampered Youth, The Theodore Hu Memorial Film Society,
November 3, 1969. Available at http://www.nyu.edu/projects/wke/notes/hu/
imageles/hu_691103.pdf. Everson noted that he was showing “a 16mm blow-up
from a badly battered 9.5mm print that Kevin Brownlow rescued from a market-place
in France.”
For the rst decade of cinema, moving image
works were not eligible for copyright
protection in the United States.
36
David Pierce
released in 16mm, is the Samuel Goldwyn production Partners Again
(1926), directed by Henry King.
Paper Prints. For the rst decade of cinema, moving image
works were not eligible for copyright protection in the United States.
To combat rampant piracy, producers registered their lms with
the Copyright Oce at the Library of Congress as a series of photo-
graphs. For submission, many movie negatives were contact print-
ed—not to lm, but to photographic paper. “During the period 1893
to 1915, the Library received over 15,000 motion picture copyright
registrations from American and foreign producers,” wrote Patrick
Loughney. Some companies sent in a few frames from each scene
printed on paper, while others found it more expedient to send the
entire lm. “In the case of more than 3,000 of these copyright transac-
tions, the Library acquired complete copies of the original camera
negatives printed as positive images onto photographic paper rolls.”
For 18 American silent feature lms, all modern copies originate
from one of these paper prints.
50
Early feature titles (each listed with the copyright claimant) in-
clude Paul J. Rainey’s African Hunt (1912, Carl Laemmle), The Count
of Monte Cristo, and The Prisoner of Zenda (1912 and 1913, both from
Famous Players Film Co.), both starring James O’Neill, the actor fa-
ther of playwright Eugene O’Neill. Theatrical producers Klaw and
Erlanger were briey in the feature lm business with adaptations
of popular plays starring actors acquired from Biograph after D. W.
Grith’s departure. Surviving Klaw and Erlanger features (all from
1914) include Classmates, with Blanche Sweet; Liberty Belles, with
Dorothy Gish; The Power of the Press and The Woman in Black, both
starring Lionel Barrymore; and The Rejuvenation of Aunt Mary.
There is also a batch of features from late 1914 and 1915 pro-
duced by the New York Motion Picture Corp. under the leader-
ship of Thomas H. Ince, starring William S. Hart (The Bargain, The
Darkening Trail, and On the Night Stage), Bessie Barriscale (The Cup of
Life and The Devil), the novelty feature Rumpelstiltskin, and Reginald
Barker’s The Italian.
51
An amendment to the copyright law in 1912 allowed for the reg-
istration of motion pictures, largely ending the submission of paper
prints. A few features were still submitted as full-length paper prints.
Others producers submitted a few nitrate lm frames clipped from
50
For more information on the history and materials contained within the paper print
collection, see Patrick Loughney, “Washington, Library of Congress,” Journal of Film
Preservation 49 (October 1994): 33, and Patrick G. Loughney, “A Descriptive Analysis
of the Library of Congress Paper Print Collection and Related Copyright Materials,”
PhD dissertation, George Washington University, 1988. For an overview of the history
and restoration of these materials, see Buckey Grimm, “A Short History of the Paper
Print Restoration at The Library of Congress,” AMIA Newsletter, no. 36 (Spring 1997),
available at http://www.members.tripod.com/~cinefan/ppart1.htm; and Buckey
Grimm, “A Paper Print Pre-History,” Film History 11, no. 2 (1999): 204–216. For the
purposes of this report, paper prints are included in the 16mm category, as they were
preserved in 16mm.
51
For The Italian, see http://lccn.loc.gov/91706396. In addition to the paper print, the
Library of Congress holds ve reels (of a seven-reel version) in the AFI/Irving K. &
Mary F. Meginnis collection, and a six-reel version in the AFI/Clement Uhl collection.
George Eastman House has a ve-reel diacetate 28mm print.
37
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
each scene in the feature; Universal Film Mfg. Co. sent in 487 nitrate
frame clips from Trac in Souls (1913).
With more than 3,000 early American short lms surviving in
this collection, as Eric Barnouw noted, “It is ironic that because of the
Paper Print Collection, the lm years before 1912 now seem better
documented than the years immediately following.” Once motion
pictures qualied for copyright in 1912, the Copyright Oce would
accept a nitrate print for inspection and then return it to the pro-
ducer, keeping only a written record of the lm, such as a synopsis
or pressbook.
52
In scal year 1913, the Copyright Oce returned 380
motion picture lms, with that number increasing to 1,426 in 1914.
In scal year 1916, as copyright registration became more common,
9,917 features and shorts were inspected and returned.
53
Summary of Surviving Film Elements
There is no single number to quantify the survival of American silent-
era feature lms, as they vary in format and completeness. There are
1,575 titles (14%) surviving in the ideal way—complete domestic-re-
lease version in 35mm. Another 1,174 (11%) are complete, but not ide-
al; they are either a foreign-release version in 35mm or the American
version in a small-gauge print with less than 35mm image quality.
Another 562 titles (5%) are incomplete and exist in a variety of for-
mats, including a few reels in 35mm, a shortened Kodascope edition
in 16mm, and several cut to a third or less of the original in 9.5mm.
52
Introduction by Erik Barnouw in Kemp R. Niver, Early Motion Pictures: The Paper
Print Collection in the Library of Congress (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1985),
xvi.
53
“Report of the Register of Copyrights,” Library of Congress Copyright Oce, for
each year; http://www.copyright.gov/history/index.html. These numbers included
features and shorts of both U.S. and foreign origin. Many more lms were not
registered for copyright.
Fig. 18: American Silent Feature
Film Survival, by Format
(complete and incomplete)
38
David Pierce
Figures 18 and 19 summarize the information from the previous
charts.
In the United States, most surviving lms are held in ve major
lm archives. The Packard Campus for Audio Visual Conservation
is part of the Library of Congress, the largest library in the world,
and the nation’s oldest federal cultural institution. The Museum
of Modern Art and George Eastman House are parts of museums,
and the UCLA Film & Television Archive is within a university. The
Academy Film Archive is one of the education, outreach, preserva-
tion and research activities supported by the Academy Foundation,
part of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
There are only 23 instances where copies of the same lm are held
at all ve institutions. Each archive has material on D. W. Grith’s
Intolerance (1916). Director D. W. Grith had four nitrate prints in
storage in 1930—two went to the Museum of Modern Art (along with
the negative) in 1938, one was sold by the storage facility to Eastman
House after Grith’s death in 1948, and the fourth was purchased
by John Hampton and is now at UCLA. What is the value of multiple
copies? As Grith scholar Russell Merritt noted, “There was never a
single denitive circulating [version of Intolerance]. Today, each of the
‘standard’ Intolerance prints lacks some minor scene or shot, and each
one contains some scene, species of intertitle, cluster of shots, shot ar-
rangement, or shot length, that none of the others have.”
54
54
The surprisingly complex path of the various prints and versions of Intolerance
is discussed in Russell Merritt, “D. W. Grith’s Intolerance: Reconstructing an
Unattainable Text,” Film History 4, no. 4 (1990): 369.
Number of lms
Fig. 19: Statistics for Survival of
American Silent Feature Films,
by Format and Completeness
39
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
The Academy Film Archive has the material prepared by
Blackhawk Films, which licensed Intolerance from the successor to
the director’s estate. The Library of Congress has 2,203 nitrate lm
frames submitted for copyright that were the basis of a 1989 Museum
of Modern Art/Library of Congress project to reconstruct the lm to
the edition seen at its original premiere.
In addition to titles held at multiple institutions, each archive has
unique titles in its collection, the result of acquisitions dating back
decades. There are 1,270 titles held exclusively by one of the ve
American archives. The Library of Congress has 776 of these titles, a
full 61%. This is because of the studio donations, the acquisition of
collections as far back as the 1940s, hundreds of titles that came from
private collectors, and a large collection of fragments and incomplete
prints. Next are George Eastman House (220 titles, 18%), UCLA
(144 titles, 11%), the Museum of Modern Art (117 titles, 9%), and the
Academy Film Archive (13 titles, <1%). The relatively low number
for the Museum of Modern Art is actually a mark of success, as the
lms rescued by the museum and oered for educational use by the
Circulating Film Library became widely available for classrooms and
lm societies and were placed in commercial distribution by their
owners. These included many classics, including lms directed by D.
W. Grith, starring Douglas Fairbanks, Buster Keaton, and Rudolph
Valentino.
Source of the Surviving Copies
The major studios played an important role in both the survival and
loss of the lms that they produced. While it is accurate to point to
the past negligence and indierence of corporate owners, and to
despair about the lack of studio interest in lm preservation through
the 1980s from all the companies other than MGM, a large propor-
tion of the studio lms that do survive exist because of the willing-
ness of those companies to work cooperatively with archives.
MGM began a comprehensive “nitrate conversion” program in
the early 1960s to copy nitrate elements of every lm in the vaults to
safety lm. The value of older lms was more signicant at the stu-
dio, as they had a number of lms that showed ongoing commercial
value as reissues, ranging from Gone with the Wind (1939) to The
Yearling (1947) and The Good Earth (1937). Because the studio owned
MGM Laboratories, which had an evening shift to process dailies for
lms in production, the only added cost of the preservation program
was lm stock and chemicals.
The studio preserved its entire nitrate lm library, including 236
silent feature lms. This included lms from the companies that
A large proportion of the studio lms that survive
exist because of the willingness of those companies
to work cooperatively with archives.
40
David Pierce
combined to create MGM: Metro Pictures, Goldwyn Pictures, and
Louis B. Mayer Productions, and titles such as La Vie de Boheme
(1916), which had been purchased for their remake value. The studio
also preserved lms with no apparent commercial value, such as
the silent-release version of The Last of Mrs. Cheyney (1929), Norma
Shearer’s second all-talkie, and silent lms for which the studio’s
rights had expired. The studio also located prints of missing lms
overseas, creating new intertitles when necessary, and restoring
recorded-music soundtracks to lms with Movietone scores. Starting
in 1967, the remaining nitrate was sent to George Eastman House,
which had been working with the studio since 1950 to preserve
MGM lms.
It is striking how few MGM lms survive from other sources. If
not for the studio preservation program, very little of the company’s
output would exist.
This study traced the origin of as many surviving copies as
possible. As a representative example, many surviving Fox silent
features came directly from the studio. A Fool There Was (1915), the
lm that established Theda Bara in her screen persona as a vamp,
was requested by the Museum of Modern Art in 1935, and a nitrate
print of East Lynne (1916), the only other surviving Theda Bara Fox
feature, came as part of a major shipment of nitrate prints discovered
at the studio in 1968. The only surviving copy of John Ford’s North of
Hudson Bay (1923), with Tom Mix, came from the Czech Film Archive
to the Library of Congress in 1969. These acquisitions of 66 copies
from the studio and 70 from other sources do not compare to an ad-
ditional 683 Fox titles that are lost.
55
55
For background on the rediscovery of Fox silent lms in the 1960s, see William
K. Everson, “Film Treasure Trove: The Film Preservation Program at 20th Century
Fox,” Films in Review, December 1974. Available at http://www.lmsinreview.
com/2012/11/30/lm-treasure-trove.
Fig. 20: Our Dancing Daughters
(1928)–Lobby Card. If not for MGM’s
studio preservation program,
very little of the company’s output
would exist today. Our Dancing
Daughters is one of more than 200
silent features preserved by MGM
Laboratories in the 1960s.
41
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Studios
It is remarkable that all of today’s major studios—Disney, Paramount,
Twentieth Century Fox, Universal, and Warner Bros., and the dormant
MGM and United Artists—have their roots in companies that were
equally dominant in the 1910s and 1920s. Twentieth Century Fox cel-
ebrated its 75th anniversary in 2010, but Fox Film Corp. dates to 1914.
Of the 3,311 feature lms that survive in any form, roughly 1,699
were produced by one of the major studios or their predecessor
companies. Of those, 531 titles passed directly from the studio to an
archive or were preserved by the studio. Twice as many, 1,168, have
emerged from other sources.
Vanished studios that were major producers in the silent era,
such as Triangle and World, ended up in bankruptcy and their lms
were sold for their remake value. Other companies of equal stature at
the time were acquired by more prosperous companies and, in
Table 1: Sources of Surviving Copies of Studio-Owned American
Silent Feature Films, Grouped by Owner
56
general, stored the old lms as inventory until they decomposed or
were lost in a re, junked, or transferred to an archive. Warner Bros.,
for example, bought out Vitagraph, and maintained the back catalog
of negatives. A calamitous re in 1935 that nearly razed the Burbank
56
Several studios are associated in this chart as a result of mergers and purchases of
lm libraries. Columbia Pictures bought the Pathé library in 1935. The lms produced
by the companies that merged in 1924 to form MGM were looked after by the new
company. Universal purchased the Selznick/Select library out of bankruptcy in 1924.
Warner Bros. absorbed Vitagraph (which had purchased Kalem in 1917) in 1925 and
took control of First National in 1928. When possible, these totals exclude lms that
the studios only released and where rights reverted to the producer, for example, the
dozens of Thomas H. Ince productions distributed by Paramount in the late teens
and some of the independent producers releasing through First National and Pathé.
Surviving copies in this chart include complete and incomplete lms.
PRODUCER
SOURCE OF
SURVIVING COPY
LOST
STUDIO OTHER
Columbia Pictures
13
56 58
Pathé
0
121 257
Fox Film
66
70 683
Goldwyn Pictures
27
53 133
Louis B. Mayer Productions
11
3
23
Metro Pictures
53
56 285
MGM
128 23 71
Paramount
156 205 861
R-C/FBO
2
123 324
Universal
8
252 690
Selznick/Select
8
36 146
Kalem Co.
1 1 19
Vitagraph
2
38 312
First National
33
87 294
Warner Bros.
23
44 120
Total
531 1,168 4,276
42
David Pierce
studio back lot claimed most or all of the Vitagraph negatives.
57
“Tracking early studio ‘lm preservation’ eorts, or in corporate-
parlance, the trajectory of media asset management, proves dicult,
if not impossible,” noted Caroline Frick.
58
Paramount Pictures pres-
ents a representative example of a studio working in cooperation
with archives for the protection of its remaining silent lms.
Independent Producers
Independent producers existed on a dierent plane than the major
studios. They raised their own production funding and relied on oth-
er companies for distribution. Independent producers included some
of the biggest stars in the industry—Charles Chaplin, Harold Lloyd,
Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, William S. Hart—and major pro-
ducers such as Thomas H. Ince, Samuel Goldwyn, Howard Hughes,
Marion Davies (Cosmopolitan Productions), and, for a while, Cecil
B. DeMille. Joseph M. Schenck produced features for his extended
family of wife Norma Talmadge, her sister Constance Talmadge, and
brother-in-law Buster Keaton.
The survival rate for these lms is generally much higher than
that of the studio product. Chaplin, Lloyd, Pickford, and Hughes
paid for the preservation of their nitrate negatives. The lms of
Fairbanks, Hart, Davies, and Ince were placed with archives, and as
a result most of their lms are preserved. Entrepreneur Raymond
Rohauer bought the Buster Keaton and Talmadge lms, preserving
the Keaton titles in the course of making prints for commercial
distribution. His estate transferred the Talmadge lms, historically
important for their depictions of women, to the Library of Congress
for preservation.
59
During a star’s lifetime, lms were occasionally loaned for
screenings or brought out to show to friends. Producer and star
Marion Davies kept prints of her lms at San Simeon and her estate
in Beverly Hills and the negatives in commercial storage. A family
friend of Joseph P. Kennedy, Davies attended the wedding of John
F. Kennedy and Jacqueline Bouvier in 1953 and oered her Beverly
Hills estate for their honeymoon. In her thank you note to Davies,
Jacqueline Kennedy wrote that “we saw one of your movies—It was
a terric battle—Jack wanted Operator 13—and [Davies’ employee]
Ingo said we shouldn’t see that on our honeymoon—we had to have
Little Old New York—then we decided on both—but we nally settled
for Going Hollywood—which I adored.” They wisely skipped the 1934
57
“Films Valued as Historical Lost: Early Pictures Destroyed When Flames Rage in
Library at Studio,” Glendale News-Press, December 5, 1934, 1. Thanks to Warner Bros.
archivist Leith Adams for providing information on this re.
58
Caroline Frick, Saving Cinema: The Politics of Preservation (New York: Oxford
University Press, 2011), 66. The book is adapted from Caroline Jane Frick’s 2005 PhD
dissertation, “Restoration Nation: Motion Picture Archives and ‘American’ Film
Heritage.” Available at http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/1915.
59
For more background on Raymond Rohauer, see John Baxter, “The Silent Empire
of Raymond Rohauer,” Sunday Times (London), January 19, 1975 (this article is
not included in the ProQuest digital edition of the London Times), and William K.
Everson, “Raymond Rohauer: King of the Film Freebooters,” Grand Street, no. 49
(1994): 188–196.
43
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
P
aramount Pictures and its corporate antecedents
were the dominant studio/distributor/exhibi-
tor until the rise of MGM in the second half of the
1920s. When the company sold its 1929–1948 sound fea-
tures to a television distributor in 1958, the silent lms
were excluded because they had no value for television.
Paramount Pictures did not have a preservation program
until the 1980s, although they did make new negatives on
occasion when it was a necessary step to create a print.
For example, Old Ironsides (1926) was preserved in 1959
when the studio was preparing a theatrical rerelease with
narration. By 1970, the studio had preserved 37 of its si-
lent lms, including a few major productions, but mostly
minor Wallace Beery comedies and Zane Grey westerns.
i
Hazel Marshall of Paramount’s editorial department told
the AFI that “these particular lms were special favorites
of Mr. Zukor’s which were kept available in exhibition
condition in case Mr. Zukor decided he wanted to see
them or have them shown to somebody.”
ii
Although Paramount was not actively preserving its
heritage, the company had always been willing to work
with archives on a title-by-title basis. The Museum of
Modern Art requested its rst prints from Paramount in
1935. Curator Iris Barry thought highly of director Josef
von Sternberg, writing “in every lm that he has made,
von Sternberg’s highly personal feeling for atmosphere
and for texture can be detected.” The rst six silent fea-
tures requested by the museum included the director’s
Underworld (1927) and The Last Command (1928). Indi-
vidual requests continued for decades; D. W. Grith’s
The Sorrows of Satan (1927) was acquired in 1962. George
Eastman House established a similar relationship with
Paramount. Curator James Card’s requests in 1950 in-
cluded von Sternberg’s The Docks of New York (1928) and
Beggars of Life (1928), with Louise Brooks. In 1965, Card
inquired about lms starring Gloria Swanson and was
told that of the 27 silent features she had made at Para-
mount, 3 remained. Of these, he was able to acquire two:
Her Husband’s Trademark (1922) and Stage Struck (1925). By
1971, Paramount had donated 37 silent and sound lms
to Eastman House.
iii
Soon after its founding in 1967, the AFI approached the
studio to donate its remaining silent-era nitrate to the Li-
brary of Congress (predominantly studio reference prints
rather than negatives). UCLA had already received au-
thorization to acquire the studio’s prints of its 1929–1948
lms, and Richard Simonton, Jr., arranged for the transfer
of those copies from Paramount’s vaults to commercial
storage. “There were about two hundred titles not on
Paramount’s inventory,” Simonton recalled, “including
CASE STUDY
Paramount Pictures
silents from 1914 on and sound lms not in the MCA
package, either expired properties, independent produc-
tions, or otherwise abandoned prints. We began to real-
ize we were uncovering buried treasure.”
iv
That treasure,
acquired by the American Film Institute (AFI) between
1968 and 1970, included nitrate prints of The Vanishing
American (1926) and Redskin (1929), two of the few Hol-
lywood lms to seriously examine the plight of Native
Americans. This acquisition was just in time. “In the
four years preceding Paramount’s [rst] gift of about 90
feature lms,” AFI archivist David Shepard noted at the
time, “they had scrapped about 70 silent pictures—in
many cases the last copies.” And “between November
1968 and the following April when the lms were nally
shipped, 13 of them had deteriorated.”
v
In 1970, the studio discovered 11 additional negatives
and ne-grain masters in a vault in New Jersey. These
were titles to which the studio’s rights had expired or
silent-release versions of sound lms. These included
the foreign-release versions of For Heaven’s Sake (1926)
and The Kid Brother (1927), with Harold Lloyd; two Clara
Bow features, Children of Divorce and Get Your Man (both
1927); and silent-release versions of early talkies: Ernst
Lubitsch’s Monte Carlo (1930) and True to the Navy (1930),
which is, according to archivist James Cozart, the only
Clara Bow silent lm of which the original negative sur-
vives.
vi
With this last shipment, the studio noted, “Par-
amount now has no silent lm material whatsoever in
Hollywood. After we ship the pictures [in New Jersey]
to you, Paramount will have no silent lm print material
whatsoever.”
vii
The UCLA Film & Television Archive worked with Para-
mount in 1991 on a joint preservation project on the stu-
dio’s newly discovered nitrate print of Tess of the Storm
Country (1914). Sometimes studios and archives shuttled
lms on a two-way street; the studio borrowed back ma-
terial from archives to create its own preservation materi-
als on The Covered Wagon (1923), the Josef von Sternberg
lms, and The Wedding March (1928), among others.
Beyond the 163 Paramount titles in archives that originat-
ed from the studio, another 25 lms survived only in the
collection of director Cecil B. DeMille, who acquired cop-
ies of most of his lms. Five other titles exist as copyright
paper prints, and 11 more titles survive only in 16mm
prints distributed by the Kodascope Libraries.
Finally, 160 Paramount features came to domestic and
foreign archives from other sources, usually private col-
lectors. The 1916 Snow White, which made such an im-
pression on the young Walt Disney that he cited the lm
44
David Pierce
as an inspiration for his own version, was thought to
be lost when Disney was preparing his animated ver-
sion in the 1930s.
viii
A nitrate print in the collection of the
Nederland Filmmuseum under the title Sneeuwwitje En
De Zeven Dwergen was the source for George Eastman
House’s 1998 restoration.
ix
The rate of survival for Paramount’s 1,222 silent-era fea-
tures is modest. At most 361 titles (29%) can be located,
and that includes incomplete titles and fragments. Of
these, 329 are complete prints (in all formats); only 238
(20.4%) survive in complete 35mm domestic-release ver-
sions. No matter how you calculate the gures, the low
survival rate is disappointing, especially to represent the
most successful studio of the silent era. The 153 prints
that the studio provided to archives amount to about 2
years of the studio’s production from an 18-year period;
when supplemented by copies from other sources, the
total reaches the equivalent of 5 years of production at
most. The survival rate by year ranges from a low of 14%
for 1918 and 1928 to 38% for 1926.
i
Paramount Inter-Communication (internal memo), Walter J.
Josiah, Jr., Legal Department, to E. Compton Timberlake, Esq.,
Subject: Silent Film Project, July 15, 1969.
ii
David Shepard to author, March 16, 2005. Shepard was
with the AFI in 1970 and involved with the acquisition of
the Paramount collection. For the purpose of this study,
“Paramount” includes all the predecessor companies and
brands of the current Paramount Pictures.
Fig. 21: Three Silent Paramount Features—Old Ironsides (1926), preserved by the studio; The Last Command (1928), acquired
from the studio by the Museum of Modern Art in 1935; and Joan the Woman (1916), in the personal collection of director Cecil
B. DeMille.
iii
“Film Notes. Part 1: The Silent Film,” Bulletin of the Museum
of Modern Art 16, no. 2/3 (1949): 61. Swanson: James Card to
Gloria Swanson, June 18, 1965 and December 16, 1965. Gloria
Swanson papers, Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center,
University of Texas at Austin, box 201, folder 3. The third
Swanson title was The Untamed Lady (1926). Zaza (1923) and
Fine Manners (1926) were later found at the studio and donated
to the AFI/Paramount collection at the Library of Congress.
“The Museum’s Collections,” Image 14, no. 5/6 (December
1971): 4. Available at http://image.eastmanhouse.org/.
iv
Robert S. Birchard, “Nitrate Machos vs. Nitrate Nellies:
Buccaneer Days at the UCLA Film and Television Archive,” The
Moving Image 4, no. 1 (Spring 2004): 126.
v
Austin Lamont, “The Search for Lost Films: David Shepard
Discusses the Importance, Methods, Costs and Confusions of
Film Archive Work,” Film Comment, Winter 1971, 60.
vi
The other titles were Darkened Rooms (1929); Illusion (1929);
Blonde or Brunette (1927) with Adolphe Menjou; Herbert
Brenon’s Street of Forgotten Men (1925); and Forgotten Faces
(1928). Of Clara Bow’s ten sound features, the original negative
to one title, Kick In (1931), survives.
vii
Letter, Walter J. Josiah, Jr., Legal Department, Paramount
Pictures Corporation, to Sam Kula, AFI, June 13, 1969.
viii
Neal Gabler, Walt Disney: The Triumph of the American
Imagination (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006), 217.
ix
Scott Simmon, Program Notes, Treasures from American Film
Archives, DVD, National Film Preservation Foundation, 2000,
107.
45
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
Civil War drama; considered, then passed on Davies’ 1923 elaborate
silent historical romance; and watched her 1933 Hollywood musical
with costar Bing Crosby.
60
In addition to the familiar names, hundreds of entrepreneurs
were scrambling to raise funding, preselling distribution rights,
and living from one lm to the next in Hollywood in the 1920s. If a
lm wasn’t the hoped-for success, negatives would be seized by the
bank to cover unpaid loans, or by the laboratory to satisfy a lien for
unpaid bills. These lms stayed in storage, sometimes producing a
small amount of income via 16mm print orders, until, after years of
inactivity, they were junked because of decomposition, the owner’s
unwillingness to pay storage fees for an
asset that had no conceivable value, or the
inability to trace successors to companies
and owners that had gone bankrupt and
vanished years before.
Some independent companies did
not stay in business long enough to take
back their negatives when the distribu-
tor’s rights expired after ve or seven
years. Vitagraph contracted with Lariat
Productions for a series of ve-reel west-
erns featuring Pete Morrison. By the end
of the contract, Lariat Productions and
silent lms were equally extinct, so the
negatives of these “Gower Gulch” west-
erns stayed with Vitagraph’s successor,
Warner Bros., which kept them on the
shelf. As a result, of the 222 westerns re-
leased in 1925, ve Pete Morrison features, including Cowboy Grit
and The Mystery of Lost Ranch, survive in pristine original negatives
at the Library of Congress.
An exception for a dierent reason was Dorothy Davenport
Reid, the widow of star Wallace Reid. She became a producer after
her husband’s death, and her rst independent lm was The Red
Kimono (1926), with a screenplay by Dorothy Arzner from a story
by Adela Rogers St. Johns. Based on a true case, the lm follows a
young girl who kills the man who lured her into prostitution in New
Orleans and eventually nds love. “Viewed today, The Red Kimono is
a strong production, lacking the melodramatics that one might ex-
pect from such a story,” Anthony Slide wrote. In addition, aside from
Louis Malle’s Pretty Baby (1978), this is “perhaps the only feature lm
to document the Storyville district of New Orleans.”
61
When Dorothy Davenport Reid was approached by the
60
Jacqueline Kennedy to Marion Davies, undated note postmarked 26 September 1953,
Marion Davies Collection, Margaret Herrick Library, Academy of Motion Picture Arts
and Sciences, Los Angeles. My thanks to Eric Hoyt for inspecting and transcribing the
letter.
61
Anthony Slide, The Silent Feminists: America’s First Women Directors (Lanham, MD:
Scarecrow Press, 1996), 90.
Fig. 22: The Red Kimono (1926)–
Lobby Card. The UCLA Film &
Television Archive used a nitrate print
as a source for missing reels of this
feature lm. Thanks to their efforts,
the lm exists intact today.
46
David Pierce
short-lived Hollywood Museum in the early 1960s, she gave them
prints of two lms starring her husband, The Roaring Road (1919)
and Forever (1921), and the surviving example of the lms she pro-
duced, The Red Kimono negative (already missing two reels). Forever
decomposed before most of the museum’s lms were placed with
the UCLA Film & Television Archive, which later restored The Red
Kimono, using a nitrate print as a source for the missing reels.
Stars and Directors
In 1956, when Cecil B. DeMille accepted the Screen Producers Guild
Milestone Award, he told the audience that “the industry will not
come of age until it makes a determined eort to keep its own great
classics alive—and to present them regularly to the public in a man-
ner worthy of their merit and worthy of the great names who made
them.”
62
DeMille was responsible for the survival of 30 lms that would
otherwise be lost (including two lms directed by his brother
William, and Chicago (1928), which he produced). Colleen Moore had
a print of Irene (1926); Irene Castle’s print of The Whirl of Life (1915),
with her husband, Vernon, is the only one that survives. Actor Jean
Hersholt had a 35mm print of Alias the Deacon (1927), one of the less
important lms of his long career, and 16mm prints of two other
titles. Director William Wyler had 35mm prints of most of his sound
lms, along with two of his silent westerns and the part-talkie The
Love Trap (1929). Sharing Wyler’s sense that the lm was memorable
was star Laura LaPlante—though her print was the silent version.
These stars and directors were the exception, not the rule. Frank
Capra had a print of one of his silent features, The Way of the Strong
(1928).
63
When asked about the others, he said, “Nobody thought
they were important enough to save. You know, the lms we were
making in those days were just nickel and dime aairs. They were
like today’s newspaper—you don’t save today’s newspaper. And
when they were nished, nobody expected to ever see them again.”
64
Some other industry personnel sequestered prints at home.
Nitrate prints were often stored in garages or in informal vaults in
houses, where they quietly turned to goo and powder in the hot Los
Angeles summers. Lois Laurel, Stan’s daughter, grew up in Beverly
Hills and recalled that the re department would come around in the
summer, asking residents if they had any dangerous nitrate lm. Her
mother turned over their reels, and, as Lois told Richard W. Bann,
she “never knew the titles involved, only that her mother had second
thoughts later in the day and phoned Stan at the studio to discuss
62
DeMille acceptance speech, January 22, 1956, in Journal of the Screen Producers Guild
4, no. 1 (February 1956): 6. Quoted in Robert S. Birchard, Cecil B. DeMille’s Hollywood
(Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004), 48.
63
Rita Belda, Sony Pictures Entertainment, to author, November 13, 2009. Columbia
Pictures junked the negative for The Way of the Strong and some other silent titles in
November 1949, according to a memo in the AFI les.
64
Richard Glatzer and John Raeburn, Frank Capra: The Man and His Films (Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press, 1975), 24.
47
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
what had happened.”
65
These people did not own the rights to these lms—not that they
had any commercial value anyway—and there was no permanent
lm archive on the West Coast that might have looked after them
until the founding of the UCLA Film & Television Archive in the late
1960s. Both garages and commercial nitrate lm-storage facilities
were hot in the summer and cold in the winter; when Frank Borzage
gave his 35mm nitrate print of 7th Heaven (1927) to George Eastman
House in 1958, it was already decomposing.
Private Collectors
Private lm collectors have for the most part existed in a parallel
world from motion picture archives and moving image academia, ac-
quiring and trading copies of lms in all formats and showing them
for groups of friends at informal lm societies. Film collector Bob Lee
ran the longest continuously operating lm society in the country,
the Essex Film Club in Nutley, New Jersey, from 1939 until his death
in 1992. Many archivists, including James Card of George Eastman
House and Henry Langlois of the Cinémathèque Française, were col-
lectors before they were curators, and as Paolo Cherchi Usai noted,
“If it were not for the drive and persistence of many an unknown
Langlois, of anonymous collectors possessed by the nitrate demon,
we would have very little to see today.”
66
Fortunately, the collectors who transferred their lms to archives
are not anonymous, as their names are credited on their collections.
The AFI signed its rst cooperative agreement with the Library of
Congress in 1968, locating titles with companies and private collec-
tors and coordinating acquisition and preservation by the Library of
Congress. Signicant acquisitions by the AFI before its lm preserva-
tion program concluded in 2008 include:
Locally produced lms for black audiences: The Scar of Shame
(1927), made in Philadelphia, and Eleven P.M. (1928), made in De-
troit, which was acquired from showman Dennis Atkinson.
The Birth of a Race (1918): A black-nanced response to The Birth of a
Nation, from the Panhandle-Plains Historical Museum in Texas.
A Tale of Two Worlds (1921): A Chinese-American girl, Leatrice Joy,
is torn between two cultures; acquired from George T. Post, a pro-
jectionist in San Francisco.
The Heart of Humanity (1919): One of the most memorable anti-
German propaganda lms, with Erich von Stroheim as a German
ocer in occupied Belgium. His atrocities include throwing a cry-
ing baby out of a window. Acquired from Donald Nichol.
65
Richard W. Bann, “Film Preservation—Another Fine Mess,” Laurel and Hardy
Ocial Website, April 2011. Available at http://www.laurel-and-hardy.com/archive/
articles/2011-04-ucla/ucla-1.html. See also the UCLA Film & Television Archive’s
project to restore the lms of Laurel and Hardy at http://www.cinema.ucla.edu/
support/laurel-and-hardy.
66
For more information on the Essex Film Club, see http://www.essexlmclub.com.
Paolo Cherchi Usai, Silent Cinema—An Introduction (London: BFI Publishing, 2008), 77.
48
David Pierce
The most important collection of lms outside an archive or
a studio was assembled by John Hampton, who with his wife,
Dorothy, managed the Silent Movie Theater in Los Angeles from
1942 to 1979. Hampton bought every silent lm in 16mm he could
nd, and purchased prints and exhibition rights from independents,
television distributors, archives, and studios. Many of Hampton’s
copies turned out to be the only known 16mm prints; these are
now part of the Stanford Theatre Collection at the UCLA Film &
Television Archive.
67
Another large collection of 16mm titles is in the David Bradley
collection of 3,964 16mm prints at the Lilly Library at Indiana
University. Bradley was a lm enthusiast who became a lm director,
historian, and collector. His collection of 1,650 pre-1930 shorts and
features from around the world overlaps with the Hampton collec-
tion, and includes a number of lms that survive nowhere else.
68
Films Surviving Only in Foreign Archives
Foreign Distribution
Silent lms rapidly became a worldwide medium. The themes of
many lms were universal, titles could easily be translated, and lm
distribution was international. Although there was a parochial qual-
ity to much American production, the relatively high budgets, tech-
nical sophistication, narrative pace, and emphasis on likable screen
personalities made them popular wherever they were shown.
The larger companies controlled their own foreign distribution;
when the rapidly expanding Warner Bros. bought industry pioneer
Vitagraph in 1925, the lure was not Vitagraph’s studio or stars, but
its sales oces, including 30 exchanges in the United States and
Canada, and 20 in England and Europe.
69
Exports of American lms
to Central Europe increased from 50 reels in 1913 to 20,000 reels an-
nually by 1926. According to a survey that year, in Germany, censors
reviewed and passed 251 American features for local exhibition. In
Spain, 9 of every 10 playdates were for American lms. Small pro-
ducers had overseas agents to manage their local lm sales, while
larger companies sublicensed all their releases to a local distributor.
70
67
Press Release, “Silent Film Collection Deposited at UCLA Film and Television
Archive,” June 1999; http://old.cinema.ucla.edu/PR/packard.html.
68
For information on David Bradley’s career and his collection, see http://www.
libraries.iub.edu/index.php?pageId=1002901.
69
“Vitagraph Company Purchased by Warner Bros.,” Motion Picture News, May 2,
1925, 1929.
70
George R. Canty, American Trade Commissioner, “Market for Motion Pictures in
Central Europe, Italy and Spain,” Trade Information Bulletin No. 499 (Washington,
DC: United States Department of Commerce, 1927), 20. Central Europe consisted of
Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria, and Hungary.
The most important collection of lms outside an
archive or a studio was assembled by John Hampton.
49
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
American lm stars were sometimes startled by their inter-
national fame. When Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks vis-
ited Russia in 1926, “we were fairly sure of a cordial reception in
Moscow,” the actress recalled, “but we were not one whit prepared
for the staggering crowds, estimated at one hundred thousand, that
met us at the station.”
71
It was “not only the tremendous vigor of the American lm
technique,” a Czechoslovak historian wrote. “There were, in the rst
place, tremendous nancial resources and a huge business organi-
zation which resulted in the complete success of the American lm
invasion into the rest of the world. And in this ood of imported
American lms the Czech lm waned.”
72
In Czechoslovakia, 35
feature lms were produced in 1926 (at an average cost of $6,000)
to serve a domestic market with 720 lm theaters.
73
American
lms were the most popular with Czech audiences, and most
American companies had a local representative. As the United States
Commerce Department noted, “The four American rms main-
taining branches in Prague dispose of their lms on a rental basis,
though … owing to the overstocking of the market with American
71
Mary Pickford, Sunshine and Shadow (New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1955),
279.
72
Jindrich Brichta, “The Three Periods of Czechoslovak Cinema,” in The Penguin Film
Review, v. 3, ed. Roger Manvell (London: Penguin Books, 1947), 56.
73
The American Trade Commissioner identied 12 Czech feature lms produced in
1926, while modern research has identied 35. See Czech Feature Films I: 1898–1930
(Praha: Národní Filmovy Archiv, 1995), 258–259.
Fig. 23: Location of
Surviving American Silent
Feature Films
50
David Pierce
lms, it is often necessary to adopt other means to dispose of its
stock.”
74
In such circumstances, there were many opportunities for
prints to leak into the private market. Those aging copies served as
unadvertised second features in small-town theaters or were oered
by touring showmen in rural areas. Eventually those prints were
sold for silver salvage bought by collectors.
A combination of factors resulted in a large number of unique
prints surviving in the Národní Filmovy Archiv in Prague, founded
in 1943. “Some [lms were donated] in the spirit of preserving the
country’s lm heritage,” a publication noted on the archive’s 60th
anniversary, while “others were simply abiding by the law, which
nationalized all lm enterprises in 1945.” The Czech lm archive’s
rst large acquisition was in the late 1940s, a collection of about 400
silent-era features and shorts from a Mr. Bouda, the manager of a
traveling cinema.
75
In 1966, the archive responded to a call from a small Czech vil-
lage about another collection from a traveling exhibitor, Mr. Pisvejc,
who had stored his lms at a chicken farm. “To my great surprise,
I unearthed from under a layer of chicken droppings about half a
metre thick around 80 tinted feature lms from the 1920s, largely
Westerns starring Tom Mix, Buck Jones and so on,” archivist
Vladimir Opela recalled. “What we had found were the lms that
had been programmed in Mr. Pisvejc’s cinema.”
76
The recoveries from the Czech archive are almost too many to
mention: lms from directors John Ford, Henry King, Tod Browning,
Maurice Tourneur, and William Wellman; at least 20 Tom Mix fea-
tures; the only nitrate copy of Ben-Hur (1925) with the original
Technicolor sequences; and the Colleen Moore comedy Her Wild Oat
(1927). All these lms have been preserved, and many have been ac-
quired by U.S. archives.
77
American Films Recovered from Foreign Archives
Contributions from other archives, while not as numerous as those
from the Czech collection, have proved to be equally important
to recovering important American lms and lling gaps in the ca-
reers of directors and stars. Only 3 of the 19 silent features made by
74
Ibid.
75
Vladimir Opela and Blazena Urgosikova, “60 years of the National Film Archive,”
(Prague: Národní Filmový Archiv, 2003), 11.
76
Vladimir Opela, “Les Miracles ont Lieu non Seulement une Fois,” in This Film Is
Dangerous: A Celebration of Nitrate Film, eds. Roger Smither and Catherine A. Surowiec
(Brussels: Fédération International des Archives du Film [FIAF], 2002), 573. Also
Vladimir Opela interviews with author, June 6, 2000, and November 7, 2009.
77
In addition, more than 100 silent slapstick comedies not known to exist in the United
States were transferred to the Museum of Modern Art.
The recoveries from the Czech archive are
almost too many to mention.
51
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
pioneering black director Oscar Micheaux survive, and 2 of the 3
were found in foreign archives. Japanese actor Sessue Hayakawa was
an unlikely but popular star in 1910s Hollywood; three of his lms
survive only in foreign editions with Dutch titles.
Some of the key missing American lms recovered from foreign
archives include:
National Film and Sound Archive (Canberra, Australia)
Maurice Tourneur’s Alias Jimmy Valentine (1915)
Cinémathèque Royale de Belgique (Brussels, Belgium)
Oscar Micheaux’s The Symbol of the Unconquered (1920)
Nederlands Filmmuseum (now EYE Film Institute Netherlands)
(Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Frank Borzage’s Lucky Star (1929) with Janet Gaynor and
Charles Farrell
Sam Wood’s Beyond the Rocks (1922), with Gloria Swanson
and Rudolph Valentino
The New Zealand Film Archive (Wellington, New Zealand)
John Ford’s Upstream (1927)
Cinémathèque Française (Paris, France)
The Dragon Painter (1919) with Sessue Hayakawa
Paul Fejos’ Lonesome (1929)
Maurice Tourneur and Clarence Brown’s The Last of the
Mohicans (1920) and The Foolish Matrons (1921)
Tod Browning’s The Unknown (1927) with Lon Chaney
Ernst Lubitsch’s Three Women (1924)
Frank Capra’s The Matinee Idol (1928)
National Film and Television Archive (British Film Institute)
(London, UK)
D. W. Grith’s True Heart Susie (1919) with Lillian Gish
Herbert Brenon’s Laugh, Clown, Laugh (1928) with Lon
Chaney
Goslmofond (Moscow, Russia)
D. W. Grith’s A Romance of Happy Valley (1919) with Lillian
Gish
Ernst Lubitsch’s Rosita (1923) with Mary Pickford
Victor Fleming’s The Call of the Canyon (1923) with Richard
Dix
Jugoslovenska Kinoteka (Belgrade, Serbia)
Anna Christie (1923) with Blanche Sweet
Frank Lloyd’s Oliver Twist (1922) with Jackie Coogan and
Lon Chaney
Danske Filmmuseum (now Det Danske Filminstitut)
(Copenhagen, Denmark)
William Desmond Taylor’s Huckleberry Finn (1920)
Frank Capra’s The Way of the Strong (1928)
No lmmaker’s output demonstrates the important role of for-
eign archives as well as does that of director John Ford. He started
his feature career with westerns—10 shorts and 28 features at
Universal. The only three features to survive from this period of his
52
David Pierce
career were found in France and Czechoslovakia. Ford’s 26 lms at
Fox in the 1920s are better represented, with 9 originating from the
studio, along with 3 from the Czech lm archive, 2 incomplete titles
from American lm collectors, and the 2010 discovery of Upstream
(1927) at the New Zealand Film Archive in Wellington, which the ar-
chive acquired from a private collector.
Even when lms survive in the United States, the foreign ver-
sions often provide crucial missing material. For the UCLA Film &
Television Archive restoration of The Sea Hawk (1924), the American
studio copy provided the bulk of the picture, but was lacking the
epic sea battles and the climactic chase that had apparently been
removed for stock footage. The gaps in the narrative (along with a
hand-colored sequence)—a total of 17 minutes—were recovered with
material from prints provided by the Czech
archive and private collector Robert Israel.
78
Identication and Repatriation
Before the AFI catalogs with information
on all feature releases were published, the
biggest challenge was to identify prints in
foreign archives, as titles of lms were of-
ten changed for foreign markets. Odd reels
might be cataloged as “unknown” or “un-
identied Tom Mix.” The Czech-language
release Tom Mix, Cowboy-Kavalir turned out
to be Mix’s fty-third feature for Fox—Oh,
You Tony! (1924)—while his next, Teeth (1924),
was released by local distributor Monopol
Elekta Film as Tom, Tony, Tygr.
79
Overall, of the 3,311 American silent
feature lms that survive in any form, 886 were found overseas.
Of these, 210 or 23% have already been repatriated to an American
archive. “Repatriation was an important element of FIAF’s inter-
national platform,” Paul Spehr recalled. “It was a recommendation
that dates back to the founding of the organization.”
80
Most of the
recovered lms were brought back a title at a time, although there
were large-scale repatriations from the Australian National Film and
Sound Archive in the 1970s and 1990s, the New Zealand Archive in
the late 1980s and again in 2010, and the Nederlands Filmmuseum in
the early 1990s.
“The return of national product to the archives concerned with
their preservation was encouraged, and was the reason for the
78
Kenneth Turan, “A Bounty of Rescued Celluloid Movies: The 1924 ‘Sea Hawk
Launches UCLA’s Monthlong Festival of Preservation Tonight,” Los Angeles Times,
April 7, 1994, 1, Calendar; Part F. Additional information provided in author’s
interview with Robert Israel, January 22, 2011.
79
Prints of these Czech editions are now at the Library of Congress.
80
E-mail, Paul Spehr to author, July 20, 2011. Spehr was at the Library of Congress
from 1958 to 1993, retiring as the assistant chief, Motion Picture, Broadcasting and
Recorded Sound Division.
Fig. 24: Tom Mix in Oh, You Tony!
(1924)–Lobby Card. For hundreds of
American silent lms, the only known
copies have been found overseas.
This Tom Mix feature was discovered
in Czechoslovakia.
53
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
publication of lists of features and shorts held by member archives,”
Spehr noted.
81
In 1977, FIAF published a list of worldwide silent
lm holdings, including 1,455 American features held in member ar-
chives. The list has been periodically updated, currently on CD-ROM
and online. The past decade has seen a groundswell of discoveries of
silent features that had been thought lost, as archives have acquired
additional nitrate collections and cataloged materials that have been
in the collection for a long time, but not identied. As the deputy
director of the Nederlands Filmmuseum noted on the 1990 “redis-
covery” of Frank Borzage’s Lucky Star (1929), “This famous Borzage
lm was not a discovery of the Nederlands Filmmuseum. It was well
known that the print existed and was in fairly good shape, but it
had to wait for preservation because there were other priorities and
urgencies.”
82
Trading between collections is as old as archives themselves. One
of Iris Barry’s rst acts for the newly formed Museum of Modern Art
was to travel to Germany, the U.S.S.R., and Sweden in 1936 to ac-
quire prints for the collection. The museum’s Eileen Bowser recalled
the importance of “lm exchange with other archives, especially
recovering lost American lms in European archives. Again, this was
where FIAF played a very important part, because those exchanges
were made on the basis of personal relations more than anything
else. You’d sit down and talk with people and talk about lms and
what they have and what they want. That’s how the real gems come
into a collection.”
83
The Museum of Modern Art provided a newsreel showing
the Russo-Japanese war to the Goslmofond archive in Moscow
in return for D. W. Grith’s The Romance of Happy Valley (1919). To
acquire Oscar Micheaux’s Within Our Gates (1920) for the Library
of Congress, the Filmoteca Española in Madrid received a print of
Dracula (1931).
84
In 2010, the Library of Congress acquired 10 lost American si-
lent feature lms as a gift from the Boris Yeltsin Presidential Library.
The lms were preserved by the Russian lm archive Goslmofond,
and digital copies were presented to Librarian of Congress James
H. Billington. Up to 200 American features are thought to exist only
in the Goslmofond collection, and future exchanges will expand
Library of Congress holdings. Also, an agreement was signed in
2011 between the Library and the Archives du Film du CNC (Centre
national du cinéma et de l’image animée), the French national lm
81
Ibid.
82
Eric de Kuyper, “Anyone for an Aesthetic of Film History?” Film History 6, no. 1,
(Spring 1994): 107.
83
Ronald S. Magliozzi, “Film Archiving as a Profession: An Interview with Eileen
Bowser,” The Moving Image 3, no. 1 (Spring 2003): 139–140. Available at http://muse.
jhu.edu/journals/the_moving_image/v003/3.1magliozzi.html.
84
Howard Thompson, “Icy Vaults Spare Films a Moldy Death,” New York Times, March
10, 1969, 52. See also the conference program for “Faded Glory: Oscar Micheaux
and the Pre-War Black Independent Cinema,” February 6–7, 2009, New York, NY.
Available at http://thebioscope.net/2009/01/28/faded-glory/.
54
David Pierce
archive at Bois D’Arcy, for the return of nitrate copies of American
lms from France.
85
The Likelihood of Future Discoveries
Although silent lms would seem to be a nite resource—no one is
making any new 1917 melodramas—the fact that previously unseen
lms continue to emerge for public screenings and festivals means
that the canon has been regularly refreshed with new discoveries.
Memorable events include Harold Lloyd presenting his compilation
Harold Lloyd’s World of Comedy at the 1962 Cannes Film Festival; the
brilliant Exit Smiling (1926), with English comic actress Beatrice Lillie,
at the 1969 New York Film Festival; the restored Ben-Hur (1925),
with a full orchestra conducted by Carl Davis at the London Film
Festival in 1987; Frank Borzage’s Lucky Star (1929), shown at the 1990
Giornate del Cinema Muto in Pordenone, Italy; and Frank Urson’s
Chicago (1928), screened at the UCLA Film & Television Archive’s
13th Festival of Preservation in 2006.
As archives have worked through their backlogs, more “lost”
American lms have emerged. Several foreign archives have deter-
mined that only domestic production ts their mission so they work
with U.S. archives to return American material, while others want to
85
The gift of titles from Russia includes ve lms originally released by Paramount:
The Valley of the Giants and You’re Fired (both 1919, directed by James Cruze, with
Wallace Reid); The Conquest of Canaan (1921) with Thomas Meighan; George
Fitzmaurice’s Kick In (1923); and Victor Fleming’s The Call of the Canyon (1923), from a
Zane Grey story with Richard Dix. Other titles include Canyon of the Fools (1923), with
Harry Carey; Circus Days (1923), with Jackie Coogan; Reginald Barker’s The Eternal
Struggle (1923); Rex Ingram’s The Arab (1924), with Ramon Novarro; and Keep Smiling
(1925), with Monty Banks. For more information, see Sheryl Cannady and Donna
Urschel, “Spasibo, Russia: A Gift of Silent-Era Gems,” Library of Congress Information
Bulletin, December 2010. Available at http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/1012/lms.html.
Fig. 25: Chicago (1928)–Lobby
Card. Previously unseen silent
lms continue to emerge for
public screenings. Chicago was
screened at the UCLA Film &
Television Archive’s 13th Festival
of Preservation in 2006.
55
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
keep and preserve the American lms that dominated their country’s
theater screens.
It can be argued that no lms are lost—they just haven’t been
found yet—but the odds are against that optimistic interpretation.
Some 130 Fox features are known to survive (in some form) out of
820 lms produced. Even if one “lost” Fox lm emerges each year,
that gap will never close.
Another factor is the limited life expectancy of nitrate lm. While
some 100-year-old nitrate lm exists, most nitrate lm acquisitions
have some amount of deterioration; the number of lms that survive
incomplete is an indication of lms that were acquired or preserved
not quite in time.
This is not always straightforward. Henri Langlois knew his
archive included a print of Tod Browning’s The Unknown (1927),
with Lon Chaney as the armless knife thrower hopelessly in love
with carnival girl Joan Crawford. In the 1960s, when Eastman House
asked to borrow the print for preservation, it took the Cinémathèque
Française years to locate it, as there were hundreds of cans in the col-
lection marked Inconnu (Unknown).
86
The search for missing lms no longer focuses on the studios, as
they have placed all their silent lm nitrate prints and negatives with
archives. The last big cache of material emerged when Twentieth
Century Fox closed down its Ogdensburg, New Jersey, vaults in 2002
and transferred the nitrate prints to the Academy Film Archive.
The search by American archives for missing American silent
lms will now focus on locating titles held in foreign archives and
private collections and on documenting previously unidentied
lms. As the major companies ensured that few prints escaped their
control, found lms are more likely to be the product of independent
producers than of the big studios. A search for The Divine Woman
(1928), one of the lms that Greta Garbo made for MGM (only one
reel found in Russia survives), is much more likely to uncover Divine
Sinner (1928), a Poverty Row quickie from Rayart Pictures featuring
former DeMille star Vera Reynolds.
Additional Considerations
While the percentage of surviving American silent feature lms is
dismayingly low, the general quality of what does survive is high
enough to make the loss that much more signicant. Some conclu-
sions emerged while researching this report.
Is everything worth saving? It is impossible to determine in
advance which lms will stand the test of time as art, or which will
prove signicant as a social record. With so many gaps in the histori-
cal record, every silent lm is of some value and illuminates dierent
elements of our history.
Many of the Poverty Row lms were ignored at the time and
would be of equally low value today. More than 1,500 silent westerns
86
David J. Skal and Elias Savada, Dark Carnival: The Secret World of Tod Browning (New
York: Anchor Books, 1995), 116.
56
David Pierce
were produced—how many B westerns do we need? Big Stakes
(1922), with J. B. Warner, is one of those 1,500 westerns. “It is not a
great picture by any means,” Robert S. Birchard wrote, “but it is one
of the most beautifully tinted and toned silents you’ll ever see.” And
the plot elements—a Hispanic romantic interest, vigilante night rid-
ers—are more interesting today than in 1922.
87
Archives originally had the resources to collect only individual
lms, not entire collections. It is ironic that in the 1930s, 1940s, and
1950s, when many more silent lms still existed, the resources to ac-
quire, store, and preserve lms were minimal. Now that the money
is available, the lms are not. Why didn’t archives acquire
more lms in the early years?
The curators recognized that nancial support was
limited, that the support of rights-holders was tenuous and
easily lost, and that parent institutions had other priorities.
Aware that it was not possible to save everything, they fo-
cused on rescuing the most important lms. The Museum
of Modern Art was most active in acquisitions from 1935
to 1941, during the establishment of the circulating lm
library. The Library of Congress had a brief burst of collect-
ing activity from 1944 until 1947, the year when the Motion
Picture Division was summarily closed at the direction of
Congress. George Eastman House began collecting lm in
1948. The perennial lack of funding limited acquisitions
and ensured that all these activities were on a small scale
until the late 1960s, when the National Endowment for the
Arts began providing signicant nancial support.
Curatorial selection has been the key to the survival
of important silent lms. Until the late 1960s, archives
were acquiring a few titles at a time. As a result, “the crite-
rion of selectivity became an end in itself, as a virtue was
made of necessity,” Andrew Sarris wrote. “Since relatively
few lms could be preserved and re-exhibited, the ones
that were had to be certied as esthetically exemplary.”
88
The process of selection for the Museum of Modern Art Film Library
by Iris Barry and her successors holds up well on artistic and cultural
grounds.
What did the museum miss? There have been laments since the
very beginning over choices.
“There are many old pictures now locked in studio storerooms
which might seem to certain individuals to be preferable to some the
Film Library has,” New York Times critic Bosley Crowther wrote in
1943. “This corner wishes, for instance, that it had picked up a print
of King Vidor’s The Crowd (1928).”
89
Eastman House had even less
funding and infrastructure, so curator James Card consciously tried
to acquire in areas that had not been of interest to the Museum. “The
87
Robert S. Birchard, “Banished from Preservation,” posting at nitrateville.com, June 8,
2010. Available at http://www.nitrateville.com/viewtopic.php?p=33661.
88
Andrew Sarris, “MOMA and the Movies,” ARTnews, October 1979, 110.
89
Bosley Crowther, “Ring in the Old,” New York Times, September 26, 1943, X3.
Fig. 26: King Vidor’s The Crowd
(1928)–Poster. This important lm
was selected for the lm archive at
the George Eastman House in 1952,
ensuring that it would survive to be
seen by modern audiences.
57
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
selections of the Museum of Modern Art were governed by only one
criterion, and that was Iris Barry’s taste,” Card recalled. “If she didn’t
like The Crowd, for example—which she didn’t—no print.”
90
Card
ensured that The Crowd was on his rst list of requests to MGM, and
he acquired a print for Eastman House in 1952.
The public domain status of some lms has encouraged their
survival. The United States copyright on most studio silent features
was renewed. The copyright on almost all independent lms ex-
pired, as for the most part, their producers were no longer in busi-
ness and there was no one to le the renewal.
91
Copyright protection should have increased the economic incen-
tive of a studio to preserve its silent lms, but MGM was the only
company to do so as a matter of policy. Copyright could not have
been MGM’s primary motivation, as the studio also preserved at least
43 features to which the studio’s rights had expired and the
company had no ownership. And valid copyrights were not
sucient to encourage other studio rights-holders to invest
in their silent libraries.
Some small producers, such as Charlie Chaplin, Mary
Pickford, and Harold Lloyd, owned the lms in which they
starred. They preserved their lms regardless of copyright
status. The public domain status of lms produced by in-
dependent companies (such as the lms Cecil B. DeMille
produced at his own studio) led to their acquisition by
entrepreneurs who preserved them in the course of com-
mercial exploitation. In 1956 television distributor Paul
Killiam bought the negative to Cecil B. DeMille’s The Road
to Yesterday (1925) after the lm fell into the public domain
and preserved it. Nontheatrical distributor Blackhawk
Films preserved dozens of features and hundreds of short
lms in the public domain.
One copy is sucient for a lm to survive. Some si-
lent lms are so ubiquitous that one wonders how any lm
could be lost. Innumerable duplicates often can be traced
back to a single copy. The one 35mm original print of The
Phantom of the Opera (1925), with Lon Chaney in his iconic
role, was acquired by Eastman House in 1950, just as the
nitrate was starting to decompose. This print, readily iden-
tiable by deterioration in one scene, is in the collection
of no less than 16 other archives (no doubt as a result of
trades to add other treasures to the Eastman House collection), and is
widely available commercially, including by Universal, which made
90
Herbert Reynolds, “‘What Can You Do for Us, Barney?’ Four Decades of Film
Collecting: An Interview with James Card,” Image 20, no. 2 (June 1977): 19. Available at
http://image.eastmanhouse.org/node/117.
91
For a detailed account of the copyright status of studio libraries, see David Pierce,
“Forgotten Faces: Why Some of Our Cinema Heritage Is Part of the Public Domain,”
Film History 19, no. 2 (2007): 125–143.
Fig. 27: John Barrymore in Beau
Brummel (1924)Poster. While many
lms are lost, Beau Brummel survives
in four different original copies.
58
David Pierce
its copy from the Eastman House print.
92
Consider the case of Beau Brummel, Warner Bros.’s rst lm with
John Barrymore, opposite a young Mary Astor. The lm was on the
New York Times list of 10 outstanding pictures for 1924, and reviews
praised Barrymore’s performance. Beau Brummel continued to be
available when it was released in 16mm by the Kodascope Libraries
in 1925 (cut from 10 reels to 7). The Museum of Modern Art acquired
a complete print in 1935, and the lm was available for educational
screenings starting in 1936. Even though Warner had sold its rights
to MGM for the 1954 remake with Stewart Granger and Elizabeth
Taylor, the studio retained a nitrate print (deposited with UCLA
in 1970). Meanwhile, MGM had retained the silent negative and
made safety lm preservation copies in the 1960s. The restored ver-
sion, with a new score, premiered on Turner Classic Movies in 2008,
and that version was subsequently released on DVD by the Warner
Archive website.
Yet in the face of that one lm surviving four times over, where is
The Great Gatsby (1926)? The last known screening was in 1947, when
the studio print was shown to consider its remake possibilities. “D. A.
Doran, the head of the story department, set up a screening of the 1926
lm,” screenwriter DeWitt Bodeen recalled. “The print kept breaking,
so I’m not surprised that it’s now listed as ‘lost.’”
93
Now, 80 years after the release of the last silent features, how
angry should we be at the loss of these lms? As Euripides wrote,
“Whom the gods wish to destroy, they rst make mad.”
Conclusions and Recommendations
The task of preserving what remains of America’s silent feature lm
heritage is manageable, as American archives benet from a high
prole, nancial support, and an unprecedented level of public
awareness. The challenge for American lm archives is to build on
those strengths and provide wide public access to this patrimony.
Recommendation 1: Develop a nationally coordinated program to
repatriate U.S. feature lms from foreign archives.
One-quarter of extant American silent feature lms (886 of 3,311)
survive only in foreign-release versions, found outside the United
States, usually with titles translated into the local language. Only
210, or 23%, have been repatriated to an American archive, leaving
copies of 676 titles (many incomplete) located only overseas.
Most national archives accept preservation responsibility only
for their domestic production, so at least some of these lms are at
92
Scott MacQueen, “The 1926 Phantom of the Opera,” American Cinematographer,
September 1989, 35–40. Scott MacQueen, “Phantom of the Opera–Part II,” American
Cinematographer, October 1989, 34–40. The print that Universal provided to George
Eastman House was identied by MacQueen as the international release version from
1930, diering signicantly from the original release and the part-talkie reissue. The
original-release version survives only in 16mm.
93
DeWitt Bodeen, “Hollywood and the Fiction Writer,” preface to Gene D. Phillips,
Fiction, Film, and F. Scott Fitzgerald (Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1986), xvii.
59
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
risk of loss. And the international dispersion of the surviving heri-
tage of American silent features limits the utility of these works for
research by American scholars.
These titles should be reviewed and priorities established for
repatriation to the United States. Titles at risk—those that have yet to
be preserved on safety lm—should be preserved on lm, with lm
or digital copies acquired for American archives. Titles not at risk can
be acquired in either lm or digital form.
Recommendation 2: Collaborate with studios and rights-holders to
acquire archival master lm elements of unique titles.
Many of the lms preserved by MGM in the 1960s still are not
held by any American archive, and the other studios may have
some unique material. A comparison of holdings between archives
and studios will likely identify additional titles held only by the
rights-holders.
Placing these elements in archives would provide the studio
with an additional set of preservation elements in rst-class stor-
age that it could access in the future if required. The archives would
benet from adding previously inaccessible titles in their collection,
which they could then make more available to the public.
Recommendation 3: Encourage coordination among U.S. archives
and collectors to identify silent lms surviving only in small-
gauge formats.
This project identied many lms held outside of FIAF archives
in nonarchival collections. Acquisition of 16mm prints has usually
been a lesser priority for archives traditionally focused on nitrate ac-
quisition and preservation. Working from old distribution catalogs,
it is straightforward to identify what lms were released on home
library gauges of 28mm, 16mm, and 9.5mm.
These known releases not held by FIAF archives include 15
Kodascope features, 61 Universal Show-at-Home features, and 118
additional features that were released in 16mm. Other formats in-
clude 13 titles in 28mm and 50 titles in 9.5mm abridgements.
Small-gauge releases have been located with collectors and could
be the subject of a focused nationwide ”lost lm” search with a spe-
cic list of titles. A focused outreach program would provide an op-
portunity to identify copies that still survive in private hands.
Recommendation 4: Focus increased preservation attention on
small-gauge lms.
The greatest cache of unexplored surviving titles are the 432
American silent feature lms that survive only in 16mm. Because of
the volume of material and smaller image size (16mm has just one-
sixth the image area of 35mm), these titles are ideal candidates for
digital image capture and preservation. Although they do not have
the re risk of 35mm nitrate lm, the 16mm prints date to the 1920s
and 1930s, and the diacetate lm stock that was used at the time is at
great risk of shrinkage, brittleness, and vinegar syndrome.
60
David Pierce
Most lm collectors want to keep their copies; digital scanning
would allow high-quality preservation, with restoration to follow,
while the lm copies could be returned to their owners.
Recommendation 5: Work with other American and foreign lm
archives to document “unidentied” titles.
All archives have lms in their collections that are unidentied,
sometimes because they are missing the main title or labels on the
original cans. Just as often, the name of the lm was changed for the
local market and the country of origin is not apparent. An aggressive
campaign to identify unknown titles could recover important lms.
Archives have occasionally sponsored showings of unidentied
lms with some success. A number of lms also have been identi-
ed through Internet crowdsourcing by experts who view lm
frames posted online and suggest possible titles. An Association of
Moving Image Archivists (AMIA)-sponsored group on Flickr posts
images from unidentied lms, mostly from American archives. The
German site “Lost Films,” initiated by the Deutsche Kinemathek
with archive partners across Europe, has a section with frame images
and invites visitors to help locate copies of lost lms and to identify
images from unidentied lms.
94
Recommendation 6: Encourage the exhibition and rediscovery
of silent feature lms among the general public and scholarly
community.
The number of America’s silent feature lms surviving in com-
plete, 35mm copies as originally released is a disappointingly low
14% (1,575 of 10,919 features). This percentage can be bolstered by
including foreign-release versions in 35mm (7%) and small-gauge
(3.5%) copies. If the denition of “surviving” is expanded to include
incomplete copies and fragments, another 562 titles (5%) can be
added to the list. But as shown in Figure 28, the 3,311 surviving lms
still pale in comparison to the 7,608 titles for which there is no lm
material at all.
Although a qualitative study of surviving-versus-lost titles is
beyond the scope of this report, it seems likely that more than 14%
of the most important commercial and artistic American feature
lms survive in complete, 35mm editions. Starting in 1920, Photoplay
magazine presented a Medal of Honor for the best lm of the year
as chosen by its readers. Eight of the nine silent lms to receive that
award survive.
95
94
The AMIA Nitrate Film Interest Group sponsors a Flickr account at http://www.
ickr.com/people/ng/. The Deutsche Kinemathek Lost Films site is at http://www.
lost-lms.eu/. An overview of the German site is described by Paul Collins in “The
Silence of the Silents: A Heroic Wiki Project to Identify Lost and Orphaned Films,”
Slate, July 8, 2010. Available at http://www.slate.com/id/2257833/.
95
Between 1920 and 1928, the lms were Humoresque, Tol’able David, Douglas Fairbanks
in Robin Hood, The Covered Wagon, Abraham Lincoln, The Big Parade, Beau Geste, Seventh
Heaven, and Four Sons. All but Humoresque and Abraham Lincoln were selected by
the Museum of Modern Art for its collections, and all but Abraham Lincoln survive
complete. The biography of the sixteenth president survives in an abridgement
produced by Eastman Teaching Films and one reel of a diacetate 35mm print at UCLA
with the sequence of the President pardoning a young boy who is accused of being a
deserter.
61
The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929
You might expect that great lms would survive. But what about
merely good lms? At the end of 1919, the New York Times chose 41
lms as “This Year’s Best.” Nearly half of those titles survive: 12 in
their 35mm domestic-release version, 5 in 35mm foreign-release ver-
sions, and another 2 in 16mm.
96
These shortcomings can be partially balanced by an increased
emphasis on providing wide public access to those lms that do
survive.
All this eort will be for naught unless the lms are readily avail-
able for scholarship and public enjoyment. The greatest advocates
for silent lms were those who saw them on their rst release—often
in a huge downtown theater with a full orchestra—and found it dif-
cult to explain the lessened impact of the lms when seen in a small-
gauge copy with a recorded piano score. That original audience has
largely passed from the scene. Replacing those original fans is a re-
surgence of interest in and enthusiasm for lms accompanied by live
music, on DVD, and on the Turner Classic Movies cable channel.
While the academic interest can be met by high-quality stream-
ing video over the Internet, these lms come to life only when they
are projected on the big screen. The focus of archives can shift from
preservation to lling the gaps via targeted acquisition and a future
of wide public availability.
96
“The Year’s Best,” New York Times, January 11, 1920, VIII/3. The surviving titles
in 35mm domestic-release version are Blind Husbands, Broken Blossoms, The Crimson
Gardenia, Daddy-Long-Legs, The Girl Who Stayed at Home, Male and Female, The Roaring
Road, Shadows, True Heart Susie, Victory, Wagon Tracks, and When the Clouds Roll By.
Foreign versions survive for Bill Henry, Scarlet Days, The Dragon Painter, The Life Line,
and The Witness For The Defense. Surviving in 16mm are Deliverance and the Kodascope
release of The Busher.
Number of lms
Fig. 28: Surviving and Lost American
Silent Feature Films, by Year
62
APPENDIX
FIAF Archives Reporting Holdings of
American Silent Feature Films
Other archives that submitted lists of their
American silent feature lms are:
Archives du Film du CNC (France)
Arhiva Nationala de Filme (Romania)
BFI/National Film and Television Archive
(United Kingdom)
Bulgarska Nacionalna Filmoteka (Bulgaria)
Cinema Museum (United Kingdom)
Cinemateca Brasileira (Brazil)
Cinemateca do Museu de Arte Moderna
(Brazil)
Cinemateket-Svenska Filminstitutet (Sweden)
Cinémathèque Française (France)
Cinémathèque Québécoise (Canada)
Cinémathèque Royale de Belgique (Belgium)
Cinémathèque Suisse (Switzerland)
Cineteca del Friuli (Italy)
Cineteca Nazionale (Italy)
La Corse Et Le Cinéma (France)
Danish Film Institute (Denmark)
Deutsches Filminstitut-Dif (Germany)
EYE Film Instituut Nederland (Netherlands)
Filmarchiv Austria (Austria)
Filmoteka Narodowa (Poland)
Filmmuseum/Münchner Stadtmuseum
(Germany)
Goslmofond (Russia)
Jugoslovenska Kinoteka (Serbia)
Museo Nazionale Del Cinema (Italy)
Národní Filmovy Archiv (Czech Republic)
National Archives of Canada (Canada)
New Zealand Film Archive (New Zealand)
Oesterreichisches Filmmuseum (Austria)
Steven Spielberg Jewish Film Archive (Israel)
The United States FIAF archives that reported
holdings are:
Academy Film Archive
George Eastman House
Harvard Film Archive
Library of Congress
Museum of Modern Art
Pacic Film Archive
UCLA Film & Television Archive
Wisconsin Center for Film and Theater
Research
63
Photo Credits
Fig. 2. Library of Congress, Prints and
Photographs Division, reproduction number
LC-DIG-ppmsca-06775.
Fig. 5. Photo courtesy of doctormacro.com.
Fig. 7. Photo courtesy of Media History Digital
Library: www.mediahistoryproject.org.
Fig. 14. The Americano lantern slide courtesy of
Matt Vogel.
Fig. 16. Advertisement courtesy of Rick
Prelinger.
Fig. 17. Pathé. Photo courtesy of James Layton.