U.S. Customs and Border Protection
GRANT OF “LEVER-RULE” PROTECTION
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Department of
Homeland Security
ACTION: Notice of grant of Lever-rule” protection.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 19 CFR § 133.2(f), this notice advises in-
terested parties that CBP has granted Lever-rule” protection to
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.’s “WILEY” and “JW & DESIGN” trade-
marks. Notice of the receipt of an application for Lever-rule” pro-
tection was published in the November 27, 2013 issue of the Customs
Bulletin.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tatiana Salnik
Matherne, Intellectual Property Rights Branch, Regulations & Rul-
ings, (202) 325–0351.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to 19 CFR § 133.2(f), this notice advises interested parties
that CBP has granted Lever-rule” protection for the following text-
books, intended for sale in the United States, bearing the “WILEY”
trademark (CBP Rec. No. TMK 06–01435) and the “JW & DESIGN”
trademark (CBP Rec. No. TMK 06–01378): (1) Analysis and Design of
Analog Integrated Circuits, Fifth Edition; (2) Communication Sys-
tems, Fifth Edition; (3) Project Management: A Managerial Approach,
Seventh Edition; (4) Principles of Genetics, Fifth Edition; (5) Manage-
ment, Tenth Edition; (6) Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, Sixth
Edition; (7) Basic Concepts of Chemistry, Eighth Edition; (8) Finan-
cial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making, Fifth Edition; (9)
Intermediate Accounting, Thirteenth Edition; (10) Managerial Ac-
counting, Fourth Edition; and (11) Accounting Principles, Ninth Edi-
tion.
In accordance with the holding of Lever Bros. Co. v. United States,
981 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Cir. 1993), CBP has determined that the gray
market textbooks differ physically and materially from their
1
correlating textbooks authorized for sale in the United States with
respect to the following product characteristics: product construction,
design, quality, appearance, market pricing and labeling.
ENFORCEMENT
Importation of the above-referenced textbooks, intended for sale in
other countries is restricted, unless the labeling requirements of 19
CFR § 133.23(b) are satisfied.
Dated: January 30, 2014
C
HARLES R. STEUART
Chief
Intellectual Property Rights Branch
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION FOR “LEVER-RULE”
PROTECTION
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application for “Lever-Rule” protection.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 19 CFR 133.2(f), this notice advises inter-
ested parties that CBP has received an application from Mühlbauer
Technology GmbH seeking “Lever-Rule” protection for the federally
registered and recorded “LUXACORE” and “LUXACORE Z” trade-
marks.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Shervette,
Intellectual Property Rights Branch, Regulations & Rulings, (202)
325–00274.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to 19 CFR 133.2(f), this notice advises interested parties
that CBP has received an application from Mühlbauer Technology
GmbH seeking “Lever-Rule” protection. Protection is sought against
importations of dental filling materials intended for sale in countries
outside the United States that bear the following Mühlbauer Tech-
nology GmbH trademarks: LUXACORE Z word mark, U.S. Trade-
mark Registration No. 3,550,378/CBP Recordation No. TMK
13–01075 and LUXACORE word mark, U.S. Trademark Registration
No. 2,358,634/CBP Recordation No. TMK 13–01098. In the event
2
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
that CBP determines that the dental filling materials under consid-
eration are physically and materially different from the Mühlbauer
Technology GmbH dental filling materials authorized for sale in the
United States, CBP will publish a notice in the Customs Bulletin,
pursuant 19 CFR 133.2 (f), indicating that the above-referenced
trademarks are entitled to “Lever-Rule” protection with respect to
those physically and materially different Mühlbauer Technology
GmbH dental filling materials.
Dated: January 31, 2014
C
HARLES R. STEUART
Chief,
Intellectual Property Rights Branch
Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade
RECEIPT OF APPLICATION FOR “LEVER-RULE”
PROTECTION
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application for “Lever-Rule” protection.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 19 CFR 133.2(f), this notice advises inter-
ested parties that CBP has received an application from Mühlbauer
Technology GmbH seeking “Lever-Rule” protection for the federally
registered and recorded “LUXATEMP” and “LUXATEMP ULTRA”
trademarks.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Shervette,
Intellectual Property Rights Branch, Regulations & Rulings, (202)
325–00274.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to 19 CFR 133.2(f), this notice advises interested parties
that CBP has received an application from Mühlbauer Technology
GmbH seeking “Lever-Rule” protection. Protection is sought against
importations of dental materials intended for sale in countries out-
side the United States that bear the following Mühlbauer Technology
GmbH trademarks: LUXATEMP word mark, U.S. Trademark Regis-
tration No. 1,911,030/CBP Recordation No. TMK 13–01063 and LUX-
ATEMP ULTRA word mark, U.S. Trademark Registration No.
3
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
4,035,680/CBP Recordation No. TMK 13–01064. In the event that
CBP determines that the dental materials under consideration are
physically and materially different from the Mühlbauer Technology
GmbH dental materials authorized for sale in the United States, CBP
will publish a notice in the Customs Bulletin, pursuant 19 CFR 133.2
(f), indicating that the above-referenced trademarks are entitled to
“Lever-Rule” protection with respect to those physically and materi-
ally different Mühlbauer Technology GmbH dental materials.
Dated: January 31, 2014
C
HARLES R. STEUART
Chief,
Intellectual Property Rights Branch
Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade
GENERAL NOTICE
19 CFR PART 177
PROPOSED REVOCATION OF A RULING LETTER AND
REVOCATION OF TREATMENT RELATING TO THE
TARIFF CLASSIFICATION OF A VELVET POINSETTIA
WREATH
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed modification of a ruling letter and
treatment relating to the tariff classification of a velvet poinsettia
wreath.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 625(c), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1625(c)), as amended by section 623 of Title VI (Customs Moderniza-
tion) of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation
Act (Pub. L. 103–182, 107 Stat. 2057), this notice advises interested
parties that CBP intends to modify a ruling concerning the tariff
classification of a velvet poinsettia wreath. Similarly, CBP intends to
revoke any treatment previously accorded by CBP to substantially
identical transactions. Comments are invited on the correctness of
the proposed actions.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments are to be addressed to the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, Office of International Trade,
Regulations and Rulings, Attention: Trade and Commercial
4
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
Regulations Branch, 90 K Street, N.E. 10
th
Floor, Washington, D.C.
20229–1177. Submitted comments may be inspected at the address
stated above during regular business hours. Arrangements to
inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by calling
Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325–1008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nerissa Hamilton-
vom Baur, Tariff Classification & Marking Branch, (202) 325–0104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND
On December 8, 1993, Title VI, (Customs Modernization), of the
North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L.
103–182, 107 Stat. 2057) (hereinafter “Title VI”), became effective.
Title VI amended many sections of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and related laws. Two new concepts which emerge from the law are
informed compliance and shared responsibility.” These con-
cepts are premised on the idea that in order to maximize voluntary
compliance with customs laws and regulations, the trade community
needs to be clearly and completely informed of its legal obligations.
Accordingly, the law imposes a greater obligation on CBP to provide
the public with improved information concerning the trade commu-
nity’s responsibilities and rights under the customs and related laws.
In addition, both the trade and CBP share responsibility on carrying
out import requirements. For example, under section 484 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1484), the importer of
record is responsible for using reasonable care to enter, classify and
value imported merchandise, and to provide any other information
necessary to enable CBP to properly assess duties, collect accurate
statistics and determine whether any other applicable legal require-
ment is met.
Pursuant to section 625(c)(1), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1625(c)(1)), as amended by section 623 of Title VI , this notice advises
interested parties that CBP is proposing to revoke one ruling letter
pertaining to the tariff classification of a velvet poinsettia wreath.
Although in this notice CBP is specifically referring to New York
Ruling Letter (NY) N026510, dated May 22, 2008 (Attachment A),
this notice covers any rulings on this merchandise which may exist
but have not been specifically identified. CBP has undertaken rea-
sonable efforts to search existing databases for rulings in addition to
those identified. No further rulings have been found. Any party who
5
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
has received an interpretive ruling or decision (i.e., a ruling letter,
internal advice memorandum or decision or protest review decision)
on the merchandise subject to this notice should advise CBP during
the notice period.
Similarly, pursuant to section 625(c)(2), Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1625(c)(2)), as amended by section 623 of Title VI, CBP is
proposing to revoke any treatment previously accorded by CBP to
substantially identical transactions. Any person involved in substan-
tially identical transactions should advise CBP during this notice
period. An importers failure to advise CBP of substantially identical
transactions or of a specific ruling not identified in this notice may
raise issues of reasonable care on the part of the importer or its
agents for importations of merchandise subsequent to the effective
date of the final decision on this notice.
It is now CBP’s position that the article identified in NY N026510
as Item Number 11338WF02C is classifiable under subheading
9505.10.50, HTSUS, which provides for: “Festive, carnival or other
entertainment articles, including magic tricks and practical joke ar-
ticles: parts and accessories: Articles for Christmas festivities and
parts and accessories thereof: Other: Other”.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1625(c)(1), CBP is proposing to revoke NY
N026510, and any other ruling not specifically identified, to reflect
the tariff classification of the subject merchandise according to the
analysis contained in proposed Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ)
H067075, set forth as Attachment B to this notice. Additionally,
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1625(c)(2), CBP is proposing to revoke any
treatment previously accorded by CBP to substantially identical
transactions. Before taking this action, consideration will be given to
any written comments timely received.
Dated: January 27, 2014
I
EVA K. O’ROURKE
for
M
YLES B. HARMON,DIRECTOR
Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division
Attachments
6
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
[ATTACHMENT A]
N026510
May 22, 2008
CLA-2–67:OT:RR:E:NC:N2:222
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 6702.90.3500
M
R.GARTH PAULEY
JO-ANN STORES INC.
5555 D
ARROW ROAD
HUDSON, OH 44236
RE: The tariff classification of a polyester poinsettia wreath with plastic
berries and twig base from China
D
EAR MR.PAULEY:
In your letter dated April 22, 2008 you requested a tariff classification
ruling.
The submitted illustration depicts an item identified as a Velvet Poinsettia
Wreath, article number 11338WF02C. The front of this wreath is completely
covered with green poinsettia leaves and red poinsettia leaves that are made
of polyester. The polyester leaves are glued onto plastic stems. Scattered
among the poinsettia leaves are small bunches of berries that are made of
plastic. Each bunch is one molded piece and each bunch is glued onto a
plastic stem.
The stems of the leaves and the stems of the berries are attached to a
circular shaped base made of plastic. There are several plastic stems of
various lengths that extend from the plastic base and the base and those
stems are all one molded piece. The stems of the leaves and the stems of the
berries each have a small aperture at the end. The apertures are snapped
onto the stems that extend from the plastic base, thereby holding the leaves
and the berries in place on the plastic base.
Behind the plastic base is another base made of natural twig. The plastic
base and the twig base are each 13 inches in diameter and both bases are
bound to each other with metal wire. When viewed from the back, the plastic
base is not visible, because both bases are of the exact same dimensions. The
twig base completely covers the plastic base, as both bases are lined up, one
on top of the other.
You have suggested that the correct classification for this item is
9505.10.2500. However, we do not agree that this item is correctly classified
in the provision that you suggest. Wreaths that have a base made of natural
twigs are precluded from classification as festive foliage in Chapter 95.
This item is considered to be a composite good within the meaning of
General Rule of Interpretation (GRI) 3. The berries are small and only cover
a very small part of the front of wreath. Neither the plastic base nor the twig
base is visible at all from the front of the wreath. It is the green and the red
poinsettia leaves that impart the overwhelming visual impact and decorative
appeal of this item. Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the leaves
provide this item with the essential character, within the meaning of GRI
3(b).
7
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
The applicable subheading for article number 11338WF02C will be
6702.90.3500, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
which provides for artificial flowers, foliage and fruit and parts thereof;
articles made of artificial flowers, foliage or fruit: of other materials: other: of
man made fibers. The rate of duty will be 9 percent ad valorem.
Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change.
The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are
provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/.
This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs
Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).
A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be
provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is
imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National
Import Specialist Gary Kalus at 646–733–3055.
Sincerely,
R
OBERT B. SWIERUPSKI
Director,
National Commodity Specialist Division
8
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
[ATTACHMENT B]
HQ H067075
CLA-2 OT:RR:CTF:TCM H067075 HvB
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 9505.10.50
M
R.GARTH PAULEY
DIRECTOR,PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
JO-ANN STORES,INC.
5555 D
ARROW ROAD
HUDSON,OHIO 44235
RE: Reconsideration of NY N026510; Tariff classification of a wreath; fes-
tive articles
D
EAR MR.PAULEY:
This is in response to your correspondence, dated May 18, 2009, in which
you request reconsideration of the classification under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of a “Velvet Poinsettia Wreath”
(wreath), which is identified by item number 11338WF02C.
The wreath was the subject of New York Ruling Letter (NY) N026510,
dated May 22, 2008. In that ruling, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) classified the wreath under subheading 6702.90.35, HTSUS, which
provides for “Artificial flowers, foliage and fruit and parts thereof; articles
made of artificial flowers, foliage or fruit: Of plastics: Of other materials”, by
application of GRI 3(b). We have reviewed NY N026510 and find it to be in
error. Therefore, this ruling revokes NY N026510.
FACTS:
The wreath at issue was described in NY N026510 as follows:
The submitted illustration depicts an item identified as a Velvet Poinset-
tia Wreath, article number 11338WF02C. The front of this wreath is
completely covered with green poinsettia leaves and red poinsettia leaves
that are made of polyester. The polyester leaves are glued onto plastic
stems. Scattered among the poinsettia leaves are small bunches of ber-
ries that are made of plastic. Each bunch is one molded piece and each
bunch is glued onto a plastic stem.
The stems of the leaves and the stems of the berries are attached to a
circular shaped base made of plastic. There are several plastic stems of
various lengths that extend from the plastic base and the base and those
stems are all one molded piece. The stems of the leaves and the stems of
the berries each have a small aperture at the end. The apertures are
snapped onto the stems that extend from the plastic base, thereby holding
the leaves and the berries in place on the plastic base.
Behind the plastic base is another base made of natural twig. The plastic
base and the twig base are each 13 inches in diameter and both bases are
bound to each other with metal wire. When viewed from the back, the
plastic base is not visible, because both bases are of the exact same
9
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
dimensions. The twig base completely covers the plastic base, as both
bases are lined up, one on top of the other.
In your original ruling request, dated April 22, 2008, you stated that the
wreath is intended for use as a holiday decoration for the Christmas season.
You substantiated this point to us in an email, stating that the article was
sold only during the Christmas 2008 season, specifically between late Octo-
ber and January, and was displayed in the seasonal portion of the floral
departments of your retail stores. At the end of January, you stated that any
remaining wreaths were discarded. In the same email, you also indicated
that the wreath at issue was tagged with Jo-Ann Fabric’s “Holiday Inspira-
tion” brand label, which is red and green and is only used for Christmas
items.
ISSUE:
Whether the subject wreath is classified as artificial flowers, foliage and
fruit of heading 6702, HTSUS, or as a festive article of heading 9505, HT-
SUS?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Classification under the HTSUS is made in accordance with the General
Rules of Interpretation (GRIs). GRI 1 provides that the classification of goods
shall be determined according to the terms of the headings of the tariff
schedule and any relative section or chapter notes. In the event that the
goods cannot be classified solely on the basis of GRI 1, and if the headings and
legal notes do not otherwise require, the remaining GRIs 2 through 6 may
then be applied in order.
The 2014 HTSUS provisions under consideration in this case are as follows:
6702 Artificial flowers, foliage and fruit and parts thereof; articles made of
artificial flowers, foliage and fruit:
***
6702.90 Of other materials:
9505 Festive, carnival or other entertainment articles, including magic
tricks and practical joke articles: parts and accessories:
9505.10 Articles for Christmas festivities and parts and accessories
thereof:
NY N026510 classified the instant wreath pursuant to GRI 3(b). GRI 3 is
only applicable where it is determined that the subject merchandise is prima
facie classifiable under multiple headings. Accordingly, the issue herein is
whether the instant wreath is classifiable in heading 9505, HTSUS, which
provides for “festive, carnival, or other articles, including magic tricks and
practical jokes, parts and accessories thereof.” To be considered a class or
kind of merchandise termed “festive” classifiable in heading 9505, HTSUS,
the article in question must satisfy the two-pronged test set forth in Park B.
Smith, Ltd. v. United States, 347 F.3d at 922 at 927 (Fed. Cir. 2003), citing
Midwest of Cannon Falls, Inc. v. United States, 122 F.3d, 20 Ct. Int’l Trade
123 (1996): “(1) [I]t must be closely associated with a festive occasion and (2)
10
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
the article [must be] used or displayed principally during that festive occa-
sion.” More recently, the Court of International Trade reiterated that: “’fes-
tive articles’ must be ‘closely associated with a festive occasion’ to the degree
that the ‘physical appearance of an article is so intrinsically linked to a
festive occasion that its use during other time periods would be aberrant.”
Michael Simon Design, Inc. v. United States, 20 Ct. Int’l Trade 1160 at 1165,
452 F. Supp. 2d. 1316 at 1323 (2006), citing Park B. Smith, 347 F.3d at 928.
The instant wreath features a prominent display of red and green poinset-
tia leaves, which CBP has recognized as a Christmas motif. See HQ 950999,
dated April 16, 1992, and HQ 951520, dated October 31, 1992. See also
Wilton Industries, Inc. v. United States, 493 F. Supp. 2d 1294, 1332 (Ct. Int’l
Trade 2007)(in which the court noted Customs’ recognition of poinsettia as a
Christmas motif). This decision is consistent with NY N027778, dated May
21, 2008, in which we classified a green poinsettia wreath in subheading
9505.10, HTSUS. Accordingly, the wreath meets the first prong of the Park
B. Smith criteria. You have stated that the wreath is “intended as a holiday
decoration for the Christmas season”, and because the poinsettia leaves are
featured so prominently in relation to the twig backing, display of the deco-
rative wreath outside the Christmas season would be “aberrant”. Michael
Simon Design, Inc., 20 Ct. Int’l Trade at 1165. In your submission, you stated
that at the end of January, any remaining wreaths are discarded. You also
indicated that the wreath at issue was tagged with Jo-Ann Fabric’s “Holiday
Inspiration” brand label, which is red and green and is only used for Christ-
mas items. The second prong of Park B. Smith is thus satisfied.
Heading 9505 provides for “festive, carnival or other entertainment” ar-
ticles. We must then determine if the instant wreath, which we recognized as
festive, is a member of the festive “class or kind.” To do this, we apply the
factors delineated in United States v. Carbordum Co., 63 C.C.P.A. 98, 536
F.2d 373 (1976). See Midwest of Cannon Falls, 20 Ct. Int’l Trade 123 at 129.
The Court of International Trade noted that “[i]n applying the [Carborun-
drum] factors, no single factor is determinative, and none of these are in-
tended to be requirements for coming within any particular heading. Ibid. In
Carborundrum, the court listed factors to be used to determine whether
imported merchandise falls within a particular class or kind. The factors
include: “the general physical characteristics of the merchandise, the expec-
tation of the ultimate purchaser, the channels, class or kind of trade in which
the merchandise moves, the environment of sale (i.e., manner in which the
merchandise is advertised and displayed). Carborundrum, 536 F.2d at 377.
The pertinent factors, i.e., the physical characteristics of the wreath, the
channels of trade in which the article moves in, and the environment of sale,
show that the wreath is principally used as a festive item. The wreath’s most
noticeable characteristic is the Poinsettia artificial foliage. As we stated
above, Poinsettia is traditionally associated with the Christmas season. Both
the channel of trade and the environment of sale in which the wreath is
offered indicate that the wreath at issue is marketed, sold, and displayed as
11
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
a decorative item during the Christmas holiday season. As such, it is clas-
sifiable as a festive article in heading 9505, HTSUS.
HOLDING:
By application of GRI 1, the subject “Velvet Poinsettia Wreath” (item
number 11338WF02C) is classified in subheading 9505.10.50, HTSUS, which
provides for:” Festive, carnival or other entertainment articles, including
magic tricks and practical joke articles: parts and accessories: Articles for
Christmas festivities and parts and accessories thereof: Other: Other”. The
column one, general rate of duty for merchandise of subheading 9505.10,
HTSUS, is Free.
Duty rates are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and
the accompanying duty rates are provided on the World Wide Web at
www.usitc.gov/tata/hts.
EFFECT ON OTHER RULINGS:
NY N026510, dated May 22, 2008, is hereby REVOKED. In accordance
with 19 U.S.C. § 1625(c), this action will become effective 60 days after
publication in the Customs Bulletin.
Sincerely,
M
YLES B. HARMON,
Director
Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division
12
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS
OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (COAC)
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Committee Management; Notice of Federal Advisory
Committee Meeting.
SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of
Customs and Border Protection (COAC) will meet on February 20,
2014, in Washington, DC. The meeting will be open to the public.
DATES: COAC will meet on Thursday, February 20, from 1:00
p.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST. Please note that the meeting may close
early if the committee has completed its business.
Pre-Registration: Meeting participants may attend either in person
or via webinar after pre-registering using a method indicated below:
—For members of the public who plan to attend the meeting in
person, please register either online at https://
apps.cbp.gov/te_reg/index.asp?w==15; by email to
[email protected]; or by fax to 202–325–4290 by 5:00 p.m. EST
on February 18, 2014.
—For members of the public who plan to participate via webinar,
please register online at https://apps.cbp.gov/te_reg/
index.asp?w=16 by 5:00 p.m. EST on February 18, 2014.
Feel free to share this information with other interested members
of your organization or association.
Members of the public who are pre-registered and later require
cancellation, please do so in advance of the meeting by accessing one
(1) of the following links: https://apps.cbp.gov/te_reg/
cancel.asp?w=15 to cancel an in person registration, or
https://apps.cbp.gov/te_reg/cancel.asp?w=16 to cancel a webinar
registration.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Office of Training and Development Conference
Space, at 1717 H Street NW., Conference Room 7300 A–C, Washing-
ton, DC 20006.
All visitors to 1717 H Street NW., must show a state-issued ID or
Passport and sign in as a visitor to proceed through the security
checkpoint for admittance to the building.
For information on facilities or services for individuals with dis-
abilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact Ms.
13
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
Wanda Tate, Office of Trade Relations, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection at 202–344–1661 as soon as possible.
To facilitate public participation, we are inviting public comment on
the issues to be considered by the committee prior to the formulation
of recommendations as listed in the ‘‘Agenda’ section below.
Comments must be submitted in writing no later than February 13,
2014, and must be identified by Docket No. USCBP–2014–0005, and
may be submitted by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Fol-
low the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: T[email protected]. Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: 202–325–4290
Mail: Ms. Wanda Tate, Office of Trade Relations, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room
3.5A, Washington, DC 20229.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the words ‘‘De-
partment of Homeland Security’’ and the docket number for this
action. Comments received will be posted without alteration at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information pro-
vided. Do not submit personal information to this docket.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket
Number USCBP–2014–0005. To submit a comment, see the link on
the Regulations.gov Web site for ‘‘How do I submit a comment?’’
located on the right hand side of the main site page.
There will be multiple public comment periods held during the
meeting on February 20, 2014. Speakers are requested to limit their
comments to two (2) minutes or less to facilitate greater participation.
Contact the individual listed below to register as a speaker. Please
note that the public comment period for speakers may end before the
time indicated on the schedule that is posted on the CBP Web page,
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/trade_outreach/coac/
coac_13_meetings/, at the time of the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Wanda Tate,
Office of Trade Relations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 3.5A, Washington, DC 20229; tele-
phone 202–344–1440; facsimile 202–325–4290.
14
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is
given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix
(Pub. L. 92–463). The COAC provides advice to the Secretary of
Homeland Security, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Commis-
sioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on matters
pertaining to the commercial operations of CBP and related functions
within DHS and the Department of the Treasury.
Agenda
The COAC will hear from the following project leaders and subcom-
mittees on the topics listed below and then will review, deliberate,
provide observations, and formulate recommendations on how to pro-
ceed on those topics:
1. The Trusted Trader Subcommittee: Review and discuss the sub-
committee’s proposed recommendations pertaining to the Customs-
Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C–TPAT) criteria for exporters.
Review and discuss the action plan to establish the C–TPAT for
exports component under the C–TPAT umbrella.
2. The Export Subcommittee: Review and discuss suggested revi-
sions to specific Customs and Border Protection’s export policies as
well as recommendations on a Master Principles Document for a One
U S. Government at the Border focused on Exports.
3. The One U.S. Government at the Border Subcommittee: Review
and discuss an update on the progress of the Partner Government
Agency –Message Set (PGA–MS) and potential collaboration with the
Border Inter-Agency Executive Council (BIEC).
4. The Trade Enforcement and Revenue Collection Subcommittee:
Review and discuss the comments from the Regulatory Audit Work-
ing Group on the final draft document on the planned enhancements
for the Focused Assessment process; report out on the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) Working Group’s work to determine the feasi-
bility of a Trusted Trader Program for IPR, the simplified seizure
process for low-value shipments, and the application of the Document
Imaging System for IPR purposes; and report on the Bonds Working
Group’s discussions on the concept of e-bonds and centralization of
Single Transaction Bonds.
5. The Trade Modernization Subcommittee: Review and discuss
potential recommendations addressing the Role of the Broker Work-
ing Group in the area of Broker Permits and update on the Auto-
mated Commercial Environment (ACE) Development and Deploy-
ment Schedule.
15
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
6. The Global Supply Chain Subcommittee: Review and discuss the
recommendations regarding the Air Cargo Advance Screening
(ACAS) pilot and address the next steps regarding land border issues
in the area of Beyond the Border and 21st Century Initiatives.
Dated: January 30, 2014.
M
ARIA LUISA BOYCE,
Senior Advisor for Private Sector
Engagement,
Office of Trade Relations.
[Published in the Federal Register, February 4, 2014 (79 FR 6616)]
MODIFICATION OF NATIONAL CUSTOMS AUTOMATION
PROGRAM (NCAP) TEST CONCERNING AUTOMATED
COMMERCIAL ENVIRONMENT (ACE) CARGO RELEASE
FOR OCEAN AND RAIL CARRIERS
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: General notice.
SUMMARY: This document announces U.S. Customs and Border
Protection’s (CBP’s) plan to modify the National Customs Automation
Program (NCAP) test concerning Cargo Release functionality in the
Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). Originally, the test was
known as the Simplified Entry Test because the test simplified the
entry process by reducing the number of data elements required to
obtain release for cargo transported by air. The test continues to be
modified to provide more capabilities to test participants allowing
CBP to deliver enhanced functionality. This notice modifies the ACE
Cargo Release test to include expansion to the ocean and rail modes
of transportation. This notice invites more participants to join the
test.
DATES: The ACE Cargo Release test modifications set forth in
this document are effective no earlier than January 5, 2014. The
test will run until approximately November 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments or questions concerning this notice and
indication of interest in participation in ACE Cargo Release should
be submitted, via email, to Susan Maskell at
[email protected]. In the subject line of your email,
please use, Comment on ACE Cargo Release”. The body of the
email should include information regarding the identity of the
ports where filings are likely to occur.
16
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For policy related
questions, contact Stephen Hilsen, Director, Business
Transformation, ACE Business Office, Office of International Trade,
at stephen.r[email protected]. For technical questions, contact
Susan Maskell, Client Representative Branch, ACE
Business Office, Office of International Trade, at
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
I. The National Customs Automation Program
The National Customs Automation Program (NCAP) was estab-
lished in Subtitle B of Title VI—Customs Modernization, in the North
American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L.
103–182, 107 Stat. 2057, 2170, December 8, 1993) (Customs Modern-
ization Act). See 19 U.S.C. 1411. Through NCAP, the initial thrust of
customs modernization was on trade compliance and the develop-
ment of the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), the planned
successor to the Automated Commercial System (ACS). ACE is an
automated and electronic system for commercial trade processing
which is intended to streamline business processes, facilitate growth
in trade, ensure cargo security, and foster participation in global
commerce, while ensuring compliance with U.S. laws and regulations
and reducing costs for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and
all of its communities of interest. The ability to meet these objectives
depends on successfully modernizing CBP’s business functions and
the information technology that supports those functions.
CBP’s modernization efforts are accomplished through phased re-
leases of ACE component functionality designed to replace a specific
legacy ACS function. Each release will begin with a test and, if the
test is successful, will end with implementation of the functionality
through the promulgation of regulations governing the new ACE
feature and the retirement of the legacy ACS function.
The ACE Cargo Release test was previously known as the Simpli-
fied Entry Test because the test simplified the entry process by re-
ducing the number of data elements required to obtain release for
cargo transported by air. Through phased releases of ACE component
functionality this test has been expanded to allow all eligible partici-
pants to join the test for an indefinite period regardless of the
Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C–TPAT) status of an
importer self-filer or a customs broker.
17
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
For the convenience of the public, a chronological listing of Federal
Register publications detailing ACE test developments is set forth
below in Section VII, entitled, Development of ACE Prototypes”. The
procedures and criteria applicable to participation in the prior ACE
tests remain in effect unless otherwise explicitly changed by this or
subsequent notices published in the Federal Register.
II. Authorization for the Test
The Customs Modernization Act provides the Commissioner of CBP
with authority to conduct limited test programs or procedures de-
signed to evaluate planned components of the NCAP. The test de-
scribed in this notice is authorized pursuant to § 101.9(b) of title 19 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR 101.9(b)), which provides for
the testing of NCAP programs or procedures. See Treasury Decision
(T.D.) 95–21.
III. Expansion of ACE Cargo Release Test to Ocean and Rail
Modes of Transportation
This document is announcing CBP’s plan to expand the ACE Cargo
Release test which allows for the filing capabilities by importers and
customs brokers for cargo transported by air to include filing capa-
bilities by importers and customs brokers for cargo transported by
ocean and rail.
Eligibility Requirements
To be eligible to apply for this test, the applicant must: (1) Be a
self-filing importer who has the ability to file ACE Entry Summaries
certified for cargo release or a broker who has the ability to file ACE
Entry Summaries certified for cargo release; or (2) have evinced the
intent to file entry summaries in ACE.
Parties seeking to participate in this test must use a software
package that has completed Automated Broker Interface (ABI) certi-
fication testing for ACE and offers the simplified entry message set
prior to transmitting data under the test. See the General Notice of
August 26, 2008 (73 FR 50337) for a complete discussion on proce-
dures for obtaining an ACE Portal Account. Importers not self-filing
must be sure their broker has the capability to file entry summaries
in ACE.
18
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
Document Image System (DIS)
Parties who file entry summaries in ACE are allowed to submit
specified CBP and Partner Government Agency (PGA) documents via
a CBP-approved Electronic Data Interchange (EDI). A current listing
of those documents may be found on the following Web site:
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/automated/modernization/
ace_edi_messages/catair_main/abi_catair/catair_chapters/
document_imaging_igs/.
DIS provides for the storage of all submitted documents in a secure
centralized location for the maintenance of associations with ACE
entry summary transactions.
See 78 FR 44142 (July 23, 2013).
Test Participation Selection Criteria
The ACE Cargo Release test is open to all importers and customs
brokers filing ACE Entry Summaries for cargo transported in the
ocean and rail modes. Please note that participants must meet the
eligibility requirements mentioned above and set forth in 76 FR
69755 (November 9, 2011).
CBP will endeavor to accept all new eligible applicants on a first
come, first served basis; however, if the volume of eligible applicants
exceeds CBP’s administrative capabilities, CBP will reserve the right
to select eligible participants in order to achieve a diverse pool in
accordance with the selection standards set forth in 76 FR 69755.
Any party seeking to participate in this test must provide CBP, in
their request to participate, their filer code and the port(s) at which
they are interested in filing ACE Cargo Release transaction data. At
this time, ACE Cargo Release data may be submitted only for entries
filed at certain ports. A current listing of those ports may be found on
the following Web site: http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/
trade/automated/modernization/whats_new/info_notice_trade.ctt/
info_notice_trade.pdf. CBP may expand to additional ports in the
future.
Any changes and/or additions to the ports that are part of the ACE
Cargo Release test will be posted to this page. See http://
www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/trade_transformation/
simplified_entry/.
Filing Capabilities
The filing capabilities for the ACE Cargo Release test set forth in 78
FR 66039 (November 4, 2013) continue to apply and are now ex-
19
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
panded to include importers and customs brokers filing ACE Entry
Summaries for cargo transported in the ocean and rail modes. The
expansion of ACE Cargo Release filing capabilities for ocean and rail
modes of transportation will allow for automated corrections and
cancellations, split shipments, partial shipments, entry on cargo
which has been moved by in-bond from the first U.S. port of unlading,
entry for a full manifested bill quantity, and entries requiring Partner
Government Agency (PGA) information, if the specified entries are
covered in the Implementation Guidelines. See http://www.cbp.gov/
xp/cgov/trade/automated/modernization/ace_edi_messages/
catair_main/abi_catair/deployment_b/. These new capabilities in-
clude functionality specific to the filing and processing of type ‘‘01’’
(consumption) and type “11” (informal) commercial entries for ocean
and rail modes of transportation. The ACE Cargo Release filing ca-
pabilities serve to assist the importer in completion of entry as re-
quired by the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1484(a)(1)(B).
Data Elements To Be Filed
In lieu of filing CBP Form 3461 data, the importer or broker acting
on behalf of the importer must file the following 12 data elements
(known as the ACE Cargo Release Data set) with CBP:
(1) Importer of Record Number.
(2) Buyer name and address.
(3) Buyer Employer Identification Number (consignee number).
(4) Seller name and address.
(5) Manufacturer/supplier name and address.
(6) HTS 10-digit number.
(7) Country of origin.
(8) Bill of lading/house air waybill number.
(9) Bill of lading issuer code.
(10) Entry number.
(11) Entry type.
(12) Estimated shipment value.
In the ocean and rail environment, the entry filer, at his option, may
also provide the additional three (3) data elements:
(13) Ship to party name and address (optional).
(14) Consolidator name and address (optional).
(15) Container stuffing location (optional).
20
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
To enable enhanced functionality in ACE Cargo Release, the entry
filer may provide an additional three (3) data elements in certain
situations:
(16) Port of Entry (if an in-bond number is provided in the entry
submission, the planned port of entry must also be provided).
(17) In-Bond (if applicable).
(18) Bill Quantity (if bill of lading quantity is specified in the entry,
it becomes the entered and released quantity for that bill. If the bill
quantity is not specified, full bill quantity will be entered and re-
leased for that bill).
Data element (1) and data elements (6) through (12) are defined in
the same manner as when they are used for entry filing on the CBP
Form 3461. Data elements (2) through (5) and (13) through (15) are
defined in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 149.3.
The ACE Cargo Release Data set may be filed at any time prior to
arrival of the cargo in the United States port of arrival with the intent
to unlade. This data fulfills merchandise entry requirements and
allows for earlier release decisions and more certainty for the im-
porter in determining the logistics of cargo delivery.
Functionality
Upon receipt of the ACE Cargo Release data, CBP will process the
submission and will subsequently transmit its cargo release decision
to the filer. If a subsequent submission is submitted to CBP, CBP’s
decision regarding the original submission is no longer controlling.
The merchandise will then be considered to be entered upon its
arrival in the port with the intent to unlade, as provided by current
19 CFR 141.68(e).
Test Duration
This ACE Cargo Release test modifications set forth in this docu-
ment are effective no earlier than January 5, 2014. The test will run
until approximately November 1, 2015, and is open to type ‘‘01’’
(consumption) and type ‘‘11’’ (informal) commercial entries filed in the
ocean and rail modes of transportation at specified ports. Expansion
to other modes will be announced via a separate Federal Register
notice.
IV. Misconduct under the Test
The terms for misconduct under the ACE Cargo Release Test set
forth in 78 FR 66039 (November 4, 2013) continue to apply and are
21
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
now expanded to include importers and customs brokers filing ACE
Entry Summaries for cargo transported in the ocean and rail modes.
V. Previous Notices
All requirements and aspects of the ACE test discussed in previous
notices are hereby incorporated by reference into this notice and
continue to be applicable, unless changed by this notice.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained in this ACE Cargo Release
test have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduc-
tion Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) and assigned OMB number 1651–0024.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid
control number assigned by OMB.
VII. Development of ACE Prototypes
A chronological listing of Federal Register publications detailing
ACE test developments is set forth below.
ACE Portal Accounts and Subsequent Revision Notices: 67 FR
21800 (May 1, 2002); 70 FR 5199 (February 1, 2005); 69 FR 5360
and 69 FR 5362 (February 4, 2004); 69 FR 54302 (September 8,
2004).
ACE System of Records Notice: 71 FR 3109 (January 19, 2006).
Terms/Conditions for Access to the ACE Portal and Subsequent
Revisions: 72 FR 27632 (May 16, 2007); 73 FR 38464 (July 7,
2008).
ACE Non-Portal Accounts and Related Notice: 70 FR 61466
(October 24, 2005); 71 FR 15756 (March 29, 2006).
ACE Entry Summary, Accounts and Revenue (ESAR I) Capabili-
ties: 72 FR 59105 (October 18, 2007).
ACE Entry Summary, Accounts and Revenue (ESAR II) Capa-
bilities: 73 FR 50337 (August 26, 2008); 74 FR 9826 (March 6,
2009).
ACE Entry Summary, Accounts and Revenue (ESAR III) Capa-
bilities: 74 FR 69129 (December 30, 2009).
ACE Entry Summary, Accounts and Revenue (ESAR IV) Capa-
bilities: 76 FR 37136 (June 24, 2011).
22
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
Post-Entry Amendment (PEA) Processing Test: 76 FR 37136
(June 24, 2011).
ACE Announcement of a New Start Date for the National Cus-
toms Automation Program Test of Automated Manifest Capabili-
ties for Ocean and Rail Carriers: 76 FR 42721 (July 19, 2011).
ACE Simplified Entry: 76 FR 69755 (November 9, 2011).
National Customs Automation Program (NCAP) Tests Concern-
ing Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Document Im-
age System (DIS): 77 FR 20835 (April 6, 2012).
National Customs Automation Program (NCAP) Tests Concern-
ing Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Simplified En-
try: Modification of Participant Selection Criteria and Applica-
tion Process: 77 FR 48527 (August 14, 2012).
Modification of NCAP Test Regarding Reconciliation for Filing
Certain Post-Importation Preferential Tariff Treatment Claims
under Certain FTAs: 78 FR 27984 (May 13, 2013).
Modification of Two National Customs Automation Program
(NCAP) Tests Concerning Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE) Document Image System (DIS) and Simplified Entry (SE):
78 FR 44142 (July 23, 2013).
Modification of Two National Customs Automation Program
(NCAP) Tests Concerning Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE) Document Image System (DIS) and Simplified Entry (SE);
Correction: 78 FR 53466 (August 29, 2013).
Modification of NCAP Test Concerning Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE) Cargo Release (formerly known as Simpli-
fied Entry): 78 FR 66039 (November 4, 2013).
Post-Summary Corrections to Entry Summaries Filed in ACE
Pursuant to the ESAR IV Test: Modifications and Clarifications:
78 FR 69434 (November 19, 2013).
National Customs Automation Program (NCAP) Test Concern-
ing the Submission of Certain Data Required by the Environ-
mental Protection Agency and the Food Safety and Inspection
Service Using the Partner Government Agency Message Set
Through the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE): 78 FR
75931 (December 13, 2013).
23
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
Dated: January 28, 2014.
R
ICHARD F. DINUCCI,
Acting Assistant Commissioner,
Office of International Trade.
[Published in the Federal Register, February 3, 2014 (79 FR 6210)]
AGENCY INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITIES:
Customs Declaration
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: 30-day notice and request for comments; extension of an
existing collection of information: 1651–0009.
SUMMARY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of the De-
partment of Homeland Security will be submitting the following
information collection request to the Office of Management and Bud-
get (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act: Customs Declaration. This is a proposed extension of
an information collection that was previously approved. CBP is pro-
posing that this information collection be extended with a change to
the burden hours. This document is published to obtain comments
from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information
collection was previously published in the Federal Register (78 FR
70065) on November 22, 2013, allowing for a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. This
process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March
6, 2014 to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written
comments on this proposed information collection to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed to the OMB Desk Officer
for Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security, and sent via electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed to (202) 395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for
additional information should be directed to Tracey Denning, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, 90 K Street NE., 10th Floor, Washington, DC
20229–1177, at 202–325–0265.
24
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3507). The
comments should address: (a) Whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimates of the burden of
the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden including the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of information technology; and
(e) the annual costs burden to respondents or record keepers from
the collection of information (a total capital/startup costs and
operations and maintenance costs). The comments that are
submitted will be summarized and included in the CBP request for
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. All comments
will become a matter of public record. In this document CBP is
soliciting comments concerning the following information collection:
Title: Customs Declaration.
OMB Number: 1651–0009.
Form Number: CBP Form 6059B.
Abstract: CBP Form 6059B, Customs Declaration, is used as a
standard report of the identity and residence of each person
arriving in the United States. This form is also used to declare
imported articles to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 66 and section 498 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1498). Section 148.13 of the CBP
regulations prescribes the use of the CBP Form 6059B when a
written declaration is required of a traveler entering the United
States. Generally, written declarations are required from
travelers arriving by air or sea. Section 148.12 requires verbal
declarations from travelers entering the United States. Generally,
verbal declarations are required from travelers arriving by land.
A sample of CBP Form 6059B can be found at: http://
www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/vacation/
sample_declaration_form.xml.
Current Actions: This submission is being made to extend the
expiration date. In addition, burden hours have been added to this
collection to allow for existing requirements for verbal declarations
under 19 CFR 148.12. There are no changes to the data CBP
collects under the provisions of 19 CFR 148.12, 148.13 or CBP Form
6059B.
25
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014
Type of Review: Extension (with change).
Affected Public: Individuals.
CBP Form 6059B:
Estimated Number of Respondents: 104,506,000.
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 104,506,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 4 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 7,001,902.
Verbal Declarations:
Estimated Number of Respondents: 233,000,000.
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 233,000,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 10 seconds.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 669,000.
Dated: January 29, 2014.
T
RACEY DENNING,
Agency Clearance Officer,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
[Published in the Federal Register, February 4, 2014 (79 FR 6615)]
26
CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 48, NO.7,FEBRUARY 19, 2014