1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
THE DRIVERS FOR INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND SERVICES 3
MODEL FOR SERVICE DELIVERY 4
Foundation // Continuous Engagement 6
Build // Building Trusted Relationships 6
Gather // Connecting Lessons about Use of Information with User Needs 7
Translate // Review and Consider NOAA’s capacity to respond 7
Assess // Review and Prioritize Product and Service Development 7
Address // Respond to User Needs 8
Deliver // Deliver Products to Users 8
Evaluate // Evaluate User Impact 9
CONCLUSION 9
APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS 10
APPENDIX B: SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORK IN ACTION 11
APPENDIX C: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 18
APPENDIX D: NWI SERVICE DELIVERY/DECISION SUPPORT OBJECTIVE TEAM MEMBERS 19
Recommended Citation. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Water
Initiative. 2020. “A Model of Service Delivery for the NOAA Water Initiative: A Proven Method for
Integrating Decision Support and Service Delivery.” Authored by the NOAA Water Team.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 2 OF 20
INTRODUCTION
The NOAA Water Initiative (NWI) was launched in December 2016 with one overarching goal: To
transform water information service delivery to better meet and support evolving societal needs.
1
As the nation experiences increasing variability and change in precipitation patterns, flooding,
drought, and other complex water issues, NOAAs mission of science, service, and stewardship
becomes of even greater importance. In 2019 alone there were three billion-dollar flooding
events, and since 2015 there have been 15 drought and flood events that together caused more
than $60 billion dollars in damage. In addition, many communities are facing increased
2
disruptions to their daily lives as a result of recurring flooding along our coasts. NOAA must
coordinate a unified service delivery approach that leverages partnerships and informs the
development of use-inspired products and services. This service-oriented approach, working
across the existing network of line offices and affiliated partners (see Appendix A for definitions),
is focused on understanding the challenges users face and helping to address society’s needs.
The purpose of this framework is to guide and improve decision support products and services
and their delivery. This document captures the shared language (see Appendix A), components,
and best practices that make NOAA service delivery and decision support successful.
“In the United States and around the
world, water security is increasingly in
jeopardy. Too much water, too little
water, or water of poor quality can
endanger life, property, economies,
and ecosystems.
3
NOAAs Mission
Science: to understand and predict changes in
climate, weather, oceans, and coasts
Service: To share that knowledge and
information with others
Stewardship: To conserve and manage coastal
and marine ecosystems and resources
THE DRIVERS FOR INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND SERVICES
Service delivery lies at the heart of NOAA’s mission and is critical in all that it does. Users look to
NOAA for a range of data, information, tools and services, but sometimes find them difficult to
efficiently and effectively access and understand. Some users seek additional support to apply
NOAA’s data, information, and tools to their situation. They want answers, guidance, training, and
a helping hand. Through
continuous customer
engagements, NOAA
personnel glean important
information about how data,
products and tools are, or are
not, serving specific localities
or sectors. (Successful
examples are provided in
Appendix B).
3
Ibid
2
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/
1
https://www.noaa.gov/water/explainers/noaa-water-initiative-vision-and-five-year-plan
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 3 OF 20
NOAA has been transforming from a scientific and technologically constrained set of products
and services, to valuing user needs as a critical input for developing useful, actionable
information. Timely and specific user needs are essential inputs for advancing and deploying new
technologies, models, tools, and resources. This framework will enable NOAA to consistently
understand user needs and prioritize responses to the evolving decisions in society.
The nation benefits from enhanced service delivery through improved decision making; reduced
risk to lives, property, and the economy; and increased resilience and strengthening of
water-sensitive sectors such as agriculture, water management, transportation, natural resources,
recreation, and energy. The benefit of enhanced service delivery for NOAA is a more efficient and
effective agency that is better able to fulfill its mission by:
Prioritizing investments in its product lines (e.g., science (observations and data), services
(technical assistance, engagement, training), and stewardship (resource management,
place-based);
Leveraging the capabilities/roles of NOAA and our partners to help meet the needs of our
users;
Developing new, and refining existing, products and services that are informed by user
needs; and
Transmitting and translating information for decision-makers across multiple sectors.
This framework describes a consistent approach that will enhance NOAAs delivery of
water-related services, and could also be applied to other NOAA initiatives that cite the need to
understand and apply user needs to guide product and service development (e.g.,
subseasonal-to-seasonal predictions, climate services, Blue Economy, and Weather-Ready
Nation). Institutionalizing and integrating these processes to align with other weather-, ocean-,
coast-, climate-, and fisheries-related initiatives and activities will better equip NOAA to fulfill its
vision of developing and sustaining resilient ecosystems, communities and economies.
MODEL FOR SERVICE DELIVERY
Effective implementation of service delivery requires relationships between information
producers and consumers built on mutual trust and respect. Key to developing and maintaining
these relationships is sustained engagement and collaboration that will facilitate the integration
of services into actionable information. NOAAs existing network of line offices and affiliated
partners is a critical asset to support improved service delivery. Many of these entities already
have the desired level of trust and frequent engagement with their community members. This
new model for service delivery offers a guiding concept to transform interaction among these
groups. It documents best practices for service-oriented approaches, processes, and tools to
improve how NOAA’s products and services are developed and delivered to society.
Framework Vision
U.S. residents understand and use the
breadth of NOAAs information for
their decisions
Framework Mission
NOAA will continuously build a network of
trusted experts who engage internally and
externally with partners to inform NOAA’s
product and service development to be useful,
usable, and used
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 4 OF 20
The foundational element, central to the effectiveness of this model (Figure 1), is the principle of
continuous user engagement. As evidenced from the literature (Appendix C), NOAA must
embrace the coordinated production of information as a critical part of product and service
development. This requires that NOAA services entities continuously engage with users in order
to fully understand their evolving needs and the accuracy and timeliness of NOAA’s response to
their needs.
Figure 1. To achieve this vision, NOAA’s service providers must (1) continue to build trusted relationships with NOAAs
internal and external users and partners; (2) understand the decisions of those users, their use of NOAA information,
and be able to gather the user’s information needs; (3) evaluate user needs (that cannot be quickly satisfied) through a
lens of both NOAA and its partners’ capacity; (4) review and prioritize NOAAs products and services to meet the needs;
(5) respond to user needs by developing new, or refining existing, products and services across NOAA; (6) deliver
these products and services to users; and (7) evaluate user impact of NOAA’s tools and services. These elements
represent a process. It is imperative that as each element is conducted, interaction occurs between the trusted NOAA
entity, end users, and various partners. It is also likely that elements will co-evolve and loop forward, across, and
behind in the diagram to verify needs and capabilities, and ensure the provision of the best products and services.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 5 OF 20
Additionally, successful service delivery includes an awareness of relevant NOAA products and
services that would be responsive to the user needs. Service entities need to be prepared to, and
have the capacity to, transfer the products and services in such a way that the users have the
knowledge and skills to apply them to their needs.
The detailed model documents a clearly-defined, high-impact approach for NOAA offices and
their core partners to capture and be responsive to a suite of user needs. The model includes
components of shared feedback received during constituent engagements, the identification and
adjudication of user needs, the integration of needs into agency science, service, and
stewardship requirements, and ultimately relies on Line Offices to respond with credible,
use-inspired products that are then delivered and evaluated by the engagement entities. This
framework will enable NOAA to continue serving as a trusted source for science and information.
Through technical assistance, training, personal engagement, evaluation, and customer service,
NOAA will guide its partners, users, and stakeholders across all sectors in applying and
interpreting NOAA’s vast collection of weather, climate, and water information and tools to build
resiliency.
THE FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING DECISION SUPPORT AND
SERVICE DELIVERY WITH PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Foundation // Continuous Engagement
Continuous engagement is the central element for successful service delivery. Engagement is a
process that is developed and nurtured through ongoing interactions and results in trusted
relationships. Critical to the success of engagement is communication that fosters mutual
learning and facilitates joint dedication to achieving agreed upon needs and goals. Like any
relationship, engagement takes time. It does not occur as the result of one call or meeting. Trust
is built with iterative, frequent, and consistent interactions in local settings, that embody
dedication and commitment to the user and their priorities. Over time, trust and relationships are
built between individuals and organizations. Personal involvement in all interactions with the
users and partners is critical because they are the personification of the Agency’s interest and
commitment. Further, the first hand involvement of the trusted NOAA entity in all steps (with
users, colleagues within NOAA, and with partners, throughout all stages of service delivery)
builds trust and streamlines processes, as they have the best understanding of the complex
needs of the users. The trusted NOAA entity has spent years understanding the scope and
context of needs via continuous two-way communication, and can thus assist with the translation
and development (and co-development, where appropriate) of products and services, and best
facilitate delivery and use.
Build // Building Trusted Relationships
NOAA’s relationships with new and existing partners (e.g., other governmental agencies,
academia, the private sector, non-profits, and the public) must be built through frequent two-way
communication and continuous respectful engagement. Central to this is fostering listening,
dialogue, and understanding with users to help address our shared mission. As a result, NOAA
and our partners will better understand and use the broad suite of water information and tools
already available, as well as the continuously evolving needs of users. Under the best
circumstances, practitioners and providers jointly assess the utility of services and identify useful
next iterations.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 6 OF 20
As NOAA considers the next generation of data and information production, delivery, and
research and development, it is incumbent upon the organization to understand, use, and expand
upon the existing array of NOAA partners. These entities are its first and most valuable resource.
Utilizing these partnerships and integrating the experiences they bring to water resources
challenges, will allow a more informed process in evolving and developing products and services
that better serve the American public.
Gather // Connecting Lessons about Use of Information with User Needs
Continuous investment in engagement, within NOAA and with external users and partners, allows
us to fully understand the use of NOAA’s information and the scope of information needs.
Engagements, as outlined above, are conducted for the purposes of building trust and
understanding the use of NOAA’s information in the context of what needs still exist. In order to
clearly capture and articulate user needs, NOAA relies on continuous engagement with the end
user. It is crucial that the trusted NOAA representative also work directly with NOAA’s subject
matter experts and science teams to ensure the needs are correctly understood. Additionally,
NOAA’s subject matter experts and science teams must understand that user needs are not
limited to specific information. Needs also include the ability to understand when and how users
will best receive, and thus use, the information. Gathering needs and understanding how NOAAs
products and services are used is a key step in using trusted relationships to build products and
services that will be used. To do this, NOAA must (1) leverage the existing efforts, knowledge, and
expertise from across the agency and from its partners; and (2) transfer user experience and
needs in a systematic and useful way across NOAA. Users can grow weary of their needs being
assessed without follow through on NOAA’s part in developing solutions. When this occurs,
NOAA risks losing the trust of its constituents.
Translate // Review and Consider NOAAs capacity to respond
As relationships are built and user needs are identified, NOAA subject matter experts will
translate the needs identified above into technical aspects NOAA will use to make decisions for
mission improvement or enhancement. In order for NOAA to produce products that will be used,
analysis teams will study, prioritize, and translate the needs as articulated from the user into the
development, or refinement, of products and services. NOAA examines not only the mission
relevance, but the capacity to be responsive and adapt to the user needs expressed. In this step,
NOAA and teams would review, iteratively with the customer, their capacity, and the capacity of
NOAA’s partners, to respond. This may be accomplished through a formal process, or through
less formal structures directly accountable to the user. Regardless of the mechanism, processes
must be focused on transparency, responsiveness, and accountability. Understanding the
capacity ensures entities who may be tasked with service development receive actionable
information to determine existing product value as well as future considerations for maintenance
and sustainment.
Assess // Review and Prioritize Product and Service Development
Once user needs are translated and defined, they must be aligned with NOAAs mandates and
mission. Once the needs are determined to be within NOAAs mission, they may be further
assessed based upon criteria such as applicability and alignment with NOAA priorities. The
criteria also must account for the urgency of user needs.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 7 OF 20
Within the framework of NOAA’s strategic priorities and goals, subject matter experts, and/or
project teams with knowledge of underlying or consensus user needs, will prioritize solutions.
This involvement can better direct development to the entity best positioned to respond, while
ensuring outcomes are addressed in an effective manner. Investing in resources (either
monetarily or through staff time) must be justified in implementing the request. Proposed
solutions will be balanced against potential risks along with opportunities to combine or
coordinate efforts to optimize NOAA’s outcomes. The results will be documented for reference,
particularly, those needs that are not prioritized. Open, transparent communication with our
constituents as to NOAA’s ability to meet the need identified is critical in maintaining trust. This
informs and fosters transparent engagement activities and capitalizes on relationships to keep
NOAA cognizant of the context for user needs.
Address // Respond to User Needs
Being responsive to the user’s requests and needs is one of the most critical elements in
effective service delivery. After the need has been identified and NOAA has decided that it is well
positioned (mission and resources) to meet the need, the work of developing the product or
services can begin. In identifying and developing the most effective and efficient product or
service to address the need, there is regular engagement with the users and partners.
Sometimes the need calls for building a new product or service, sometimes it is adjusting or
enhancing an existing one, sometimes it is initiating a process such as joint fact finding and, or
sometimes it is building the capacity of the users to apply the product via technical assistance,
training, or other learning mechanisms. There are times it will require multiple complementary
products and services such as a new decision support tool paired with training to ensure end
users can best apply. The important piece is that there is a commitment to both develop and
deliver a product and or service that addresses the need.
During the process of developing the product or service, communication with the end users is
critical. Once they have expressed their needs and NOAA has agreed to develop a product or
service, the end users need routine engagement to understand the length of time it will take, how
often they will be consulted with, and who is their contact. The more connected the intended
users feel during the development time, the more likely they will be to use the end product or
service. Interactions between experts and users can drive innovation. The development process
should be iterative providing feedback to the developers along the way and understanding to the
end users. The NOAA development process needs to ensure the products and services are
responsive, relevant, and actionable to the evolving users needs and considers the potential
impact of product/service changes on our partners.
Deliver // Deliver Products to Users
NOAA data, information, and tools are developed to enhance users' understanding and decision
making. Unless that data, information, and tools are delivered in such a way that the potential end
users are aware of, can access, understand how they can be best used to address their issues,
and have the knowledge and skills to appropriately apply them, the data, information, and tools
risk not being used. The on-going engagement element in the proposed model is key in the
delivery element. Targeted outreach and communication can help users know that a specific
product or service is available and user-friendly websites assist in an end users ability to access
the data, information, and tools.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 8 OF 20
Increasingly high touch (in person or virtual) delivery mechanisms are sometimes needed for end
users to be able to understand and have the skills to apply the data, information, and tools to
their decisions. Long term or power users of NOAA water products and services are able to
assimilate and apply new products and services more easily and can serve as peer mentors. High
touch delivery mechanisms include technical assistance, learning tools (such as case studies, job
aids, quick references, tutorials, and community of practices), as well as workshops and training.
These mechanisms are most effective if development of them are grounded in the learning
sciences. Continuous engagement with the end users will ensure the delivery mechanisms are
strategic, relevant, responsive, and timely. The value of the data, information, and tools are not
realized until they are being applied by the end users to decisions.
Evaluate // Evaluate User Impact
Evaluating NOAAs efforts on service delivery is a continuous process. Front-end evaluation, or
needs assessments, are key in gathering needs and distinguishing between the needs and wants
of the end users. Formative evaluation happens as the products and services are being
developed and includes the back and forth between developers and the end users. It is through
the formative evaluation that NOAA ensures that the end users needs are being met
appropriately. Summative evaluations are completed after the products and services have been
delivered to document the results. Evaluations can assess the results or examine the process. A
return on investment study can be then done to monetize the results.
There are many methods to collect information about how users are applying the products and
services delivered. The first questions are typically around if they are using, then how they are
using and then importantly, if the use of the products and services are assisting them in reaching
their goals more effectively and efficiently. The scope and scale of the products and services can
help determine which products and services receive summative evaluations. The science of
evaluation is best accomplished through proven social science methods (survey, focus group,
interviews, observations) done by expert evaluators particularly for summative and ROI studies.
NOAA social scientists, partners, and others specializing in evaluation must work together to
leverage resources and capabilities that will ensure products and services accomplish the
desired outcomes.
CONCLUSION
The purpose of this framework is to strengthen NOAAs service delivery enterprise so that users
can clearly understand and use the breadth of NOAAs information for their decisions. This
framework describes the service delivery concept and the activities required to inform
use-inspired products and services. NOAA’s strength is commitment to service. As an agency,
NOAA must fully engage society, utilizing its extended network and partners to leverage
knowledge, expertise and resources. The overall value of enhanced service delivery for NOAA is
a more efficient and effective agency that is better able to fulfill its vision of healthy ecosystems,
communities, and economies that are resilient in the face of change. The NWI Service Delivery
and Decision Support Teams (see Appendix D) are committed to developing the implementation
and next steps needed to realize the vision of a new service delivery model for NOAA.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 9 OF 20
APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS
Definitions for commonly-used terms from the NWI Vision and Five-Year Plan were developed
through research and synthesis of existing definitions derived from multiple Line Offices.
Audience. Targeted group for whom NOAA develops and serves information, products and
services.
User(s). A person(s), group, or organization who accesses and applies information, products, or
services.
User Group. A set of people who have common interests, goals, or concerns about NOAA
products and services.
Partners. Organizations and individuals with whom NOAA shares a mission and/or has regular,
substantive interaction in order to effectively achieve both of our missions. This definition
includes the following terms which may refer to specific LO usage: Core, Close, Key, Primary,
Federal, Traditional Line Office; Weather, Water, and Climate Enterprise, etc.
Product. A tangible piece of information (printable, visible) that enables a user to learn or take
action.
Service Delivery. The continuous process of engaging with users in order to provide relevant and
timely information via appropriate mechanisms.
Stakeholder. Anyone with an interest in the process or outcome, or who is affected by water
resources.
Technical Assistance. Targeted coaching for users to help them access, understand, and use
NOAA products and services for their own decisions.
Training. Instructionally designed activity aimed at imparting information and building participants
skills to attain a specified level of knowledge or skill.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 10 OF 20
APPENDIX B: SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORK IN ACTION
The following are three successful NOAA examples of implementing this framework.
DIGITAL COAST // NOAA developed the Digital Coast to serve those who manage our nation’s
coastal resources. This digital resource provides not only data, but also the tools, training, and
information coastal communities need if they are to use these data in the decision-making
process. This centralized repository is cost effective and easy to use. While the Digital Coast was
developed and is currently maintained by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, hundreds of
organizations and federal, state, and local agencies contribute content. This resource is a first
stop for the nation’s coastal management community.
The Digital Coast, however, is more than just a website. The Digital Coast provides the
framework, through the Digital Coast Partnership, that allows groups that might not otherwise
work together to join forces to address coastal issues. The Digital Coast Partnership, which is
composed of membership organizations who represent Digital Coast users, is essential for the
success of this effort, since partner input ensures the relevance of the Digital Coast in the face of
the constantly changing needs of the coastal management community.
CONNECTION TO KEY ELEMENT(S):
Foundation // Continuous Engagement - NOAAs Office for Coastal Management has
dedicated points-of-contacts who routinely speak to and coordinate with the partnership
organizations. In addition, quarterly calls are held along with annual face-to-face
meetings. This highly successful partnership approach is based on clear expectations and
roles for all partners and NOAA.
Build // Building Trusted Relationships - The Digital Coast Partnership was formed in
2007 to help guide the scope and content of what Digital Coast has evolved to be.
Dedicated, long-term, continuous engagement; shared expectations; clear roles;
transparency; joint strategic planning; and shared credit and shared opportunity has built
trust among all partner organizations. Even with staff turnover, the relationship has
continued because of the relationships built.
Gather // Connecting Lessons about Use of Information with User Needs - Partnership
members routinely discuss information needs and priorities. This direct feedback leads to
product and service delivery improvements for the Digital Coast.
Translate // Review and Consider NOAAs Capacity to Respond - NOAA’s Office for
Coastal Management assesses the organization’s capacity to address identified needs.
Critical to success is sharing what can be done, but equally importantly, what cannot be
done and why.
Review // Review and Prioritize Product and Service Development - User needs and
capacity to respond are reviewed to determine products and services to enhance,
develop, or in some cases, abandon. Transparency back to the partnership organizations
is a key component of this element.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 11 OF 20
Respond // Respond to User Needs - Using routine meetings and other forms of
engagement and outreach to demonstrate products and services and provide answers to
expressed needs shows responsiveness and is critical.
Deliver // Deliver Products to Users - The Digital Coast provides products and services in
accessible, and many times multiple, formats for the target audiences. Each product also
includes, as appropriate, training, tutorials, and metadata that enable the user to apply the
product and services with confidence.
Evaluate // Evaluate Impact - Continuous feedback and evaluation lead to improved
products and services. The Digital Coast Partnership represents well over 100,000
potential users; one of their primary roles is to evaluate products during development and
after release.
The Digital Coast Enabling Platform is built on the interaction between the Digital Coast Partners
and users and the website. This connection is critical to the platform’s success.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 12 OF 20
NATIONAL INTEGRATED DROUGHT INFORMATION SYSTEM (NIDIS) // The National Integrated
Drought Information System (NIDIS) Act was authorized by Congress in 2006 (Public Law
109-430) and reauthorized in 2014 and 2019 with an interagency mandate to develop and
provide a national drought early warning information system, by coordinating and integrating
drought research, and building upon existing federal, tribal, state, and local partnerships. NIDIS is
led by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NIDIS’s mission is to
improve the nation’s capacity to proactively manage drought-related risks, by providing those
affected with the best available information and resources to assess the potential for drought and
to better prepare for, mitigate, and respond to the effects of drought. Service delivery and
stakeholder engagement are key components of NIDIS implementation.
CONNECTION TO KEY ELEMENT(S):
Foundation // Continuous Engagement - Partnerships are a foundational element of
NIDIS, with numerous mechanisms for engagement. For example, NIDIS has regional
Drought Early Warning System (DEWS) coordinators that are continuously speaking and
coordinating with a wide range of regional partners.
Build // Building Trusted Relationships - NIDIS builds and sustains relationships to
implement an integrated drought monitoring and forecasting system at federal, tribal,
state, and local levels. At the national level, NIDIS has an Executive Council with a broad
representation of federal and non-federal partners. At the regional level, the DEWS serve
as the primary platform for building and sustaining relationships.
Gather // Connecting Lessons about Use of Information with User Needs - NIDIS has
supported several assessments related to the use of drought information, which has
informed future research investments.
Translate // Review and Consider NOAAs capacity to respond - NIDIS fosters and
supports a research environment focusing on risk assessment, forecasting, and
management.
Review // Review and Prioritize Product and Service Development - Regional needs for
drought early warning information is routinely collected in each regional DEWS through
workshops and sustained dialogue with partners. These needs, and actions required to
meet those needs, are further reviewed and prioritized by the regional network and
articulated in regional DEWS Strategic Action Plans.
Respond // Respond to User Needs - Deliver // Deliver Products to Users - NIDIS
provides a framework for public awareness and education about droughts, which
includes the U.S. Drought Portal located at drought.gov.
Evaluate // Evaluate Impact - The NIDIS implementation plan details the evolution and
lessons learned in moving towards a national drought early warning information system,
and highlights the thoughtful feedback and participation of NIDIS’s partners.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 13 OF 20
Drought.gov is the U.S. Drought Portal and serves as the public face of NIDIS by providing timely
information on drought to the country. An updated drought.gov portal will be launched in 2020
following extensive user feedback outreach.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 14 OF 20
WATER RESOURCES DASHBOARD // To ensure a safe and secure supply of clean water and to
protect the health and safety of residents, water resource managers and urban planners need to
monitor and respond to the potential for flooding and drought in their regions. Federal weather
and climate data and tools keep decision-makers informed, but sometimes finding information
poses a challenge to water managers. In response to requests from decision and policy makers
from the water resource management and city planning communities, NOAAs Climate Program
Office (CPO), National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), EPA, and several water and
planning-oriented NGOs have been working together since 2014 to develop the Water Resources
Dashboard (Dashboard). The Dashboard provides an integrated information resource for a wide
variety of weather, climate and water information that NOAA and other federal agencies provide
for the water sector (https://toolkit.climate.gov/topics/water/water-resources-dashboard).
CONNECTION TO KEY ELEMENT(S):
Foundation // Continuous Engagement – All regions and economic sectors in the US
depend on adequate and reliable water supplies. Too much or too little water can
endanger the health and welfare of citizens and businesses. Driven by feedback from
user communities and federal agencies, NOAA and partners have developed the Water
Resources Dashboard: a one-stop location for water-relevant data sets. The effort began
in 2014. The planning group for this effort met (and continues to meet) periodically, both in
person and virtually, to continue to enhance NOAA’s ability to provide climate/weather
data to water resource managers who make decisions at various time scales from minutes
to centuries, or basically, from today’s intense storm impact on water quality to designing
water infrastructure that should last into the next century. The original dashboard was
completed two years later. Through continuous engagement, the dashboard has been
enhanced (as described below) with educational and outreach activities, and currently
through interactions with a subset of users.
Build // Building Trusted Relationships – With the help of several non-governmental
organizations—including the American Planning Association, American Water Works
Association, Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies, Water Environment Federation,
Water Environment Research Foundation and the Water Research Foundation -- NOAA
worked to combine resources on flooding, drought, and other extreme precipitation
events into one location to better serve the needs of stakeholders. This process took two
years in which these organizations queried their key constituents on how they used
climate/weather information, how they would like to use these data, and other
suggestions for improved use of these resources to help water resource managers and
urban planners build resilience to extreme precipitation events. The group then met with
NOAA scientists to discuss the available and newly released data. Based on these
discussions, a team, consisting of water/planning NGOs, NOAA scientists and web
developers developed the Water Resources Dashboard, which was released in 2016.
Gather // Connecting Lessons about Use of Information with User Needs – Members of
the planning team meet periodically to discuss updates to the Dashboard, communication
strategies, and future steps to improve the reach and use of the tool.
Translate // Review and Consider NOAAs Capacity to Respond – There have been
continuous updates to the Dashboard. However, after the initial release of the Dashboard,
the committee discussed how to increase the use of climate data by water utilities.
Prominent in this discussion was a dearth of education and outreach materials. The team
worked over the next few years on a series of webinars that are now used to “teach”
about the individual data sources that appear on the Dashboard. Each webinar is ½ hour
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 15 OF 20
in length with a scientist involved in developing the data source explaining in lay terms
the data set including potential uses and limitations. This is followed by a 5-10 minute
response by a water resource manager who describes how they use the data in their
decision-making processes. The final part of the webinar contains questions and answers
from the speakers and the audience. Each webinar was recorded and currently resides as
a thumbnail on the Dashboard beneath the description of the data; these recordings are
also available on Youtube and have been accessed numerous times after the initial airing
of the videos.
Review // Review and Prioritize Product and Service Development – Once the webinars
were added to the Dashboard, the planning team met and discussed other improvements.
NOAA staff interviewed these members separately and found that overwhelmingly, they
felt that the Dashboard could be enhanced to better address the needs of small –
medium size water utilities.
Respond // Respond to User Needs – The NOAA Water Initiative was able to provide
funding for a study to better understand the needs of smaller water utilities. Currently,
CPO and NESDIS are leading a study with the water and planning foundations (and with
additional financial and in-kind support from the Water Resources Foundation and US
Water Alliance) to better understand gaps and opportunities with working with this
population. As part of NWI’s decision-support services, supported by NOAA’s Office of
Coastal Management and executed by CPO and NESDIS, regional meetings are being
planned to access and understand the information needs of small- to medium-scale water
utilities, to improve existing tools, and to build additional resources to meet water sector
needs at different scales. Additional tools will be developed and a final report, complete
with suggestions for next steps will be delivered in December 2020.
Deliver // Deliver Products to Users – Currently, links to over twenty datasets relevant to
water managers reside on the Dashboard accompanied in most cases with at least one
webinar tutorial of the uses and applications of the discrete data. When available, case
studies are also listed to increase utilities’ understanding of the use and application of the
data sets.
Evaluate // Evaluate Impact - Feedback and evaluation led by NGOs with direct ties to
users continues to help improve the content and application of data that resides on the
Dashboard. The current study of small-medium water utilities includes evaluation of users
understandings, needs, and desires that will lead to continued enhancements to the
Dashboard as well as other NOAA data and tools.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 16 OF 20
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 17 OF 20
APPENDIX C: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Theory Behind It, Guides, and resources on engagement and user-driven product and service
development:
- The shape of engagement, by Scott Gould (HBS)
- What customers want (customer theory, outcome theory), by Anthony Ulwick
- Adler, Peter and Juliana Birkhoff. (2002) Building Trust: When knowledge from “here”
meets knowledge from “away”. National Policy Consensus Center: Washington DC.
- Forester, John. (2006). Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from
facilitating dialogue and moderating debate to mediating negotiations. Journal of the
American Planning Association. 72:4. 447-456.
- Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E. (2010). Planning With Complexity: An introduction to collaborative
rationality for public policy. New York: Routledge.
- Karl, H., Susskind, L., & Wallace, K. (2007). A Dialogue, Not a Diatribe: Effective integration
of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment, 49(1), 20-34.
- Creighton, James L. 2005. The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions
through Citizen Involvement. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA.
- 2020 Special Edition of the Journal for Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability on
Making Knowledge Actionable for Environmental Sustainability from the Aspen Global
Change Institute
- Accelerate-- The science of lean software in DevOps (agile modifications, updates quickly,
fixing pieces)
- Andrea J. Ray and Robert S. Webb (2016) Understanding the user context: decision
calendars as frameworks for linking climate to policy, planning, and decision-making,
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 18 OF 20
APPENDIX D: NWI SERVICE DELIVERY/DECISION SUPPORT OBJECTIVE
TEAM MEMBERS
Ellen Mecray, NESDIS*
Miki Schmidt, NOS*
Katherine Hawley, NESDIS*
David Helms, NESDIS
Doug Kluck, NESDIS
Thanh Vo Dinh, NESDIS*
Colette Cairns, NMFS
Nate Mantua, NMFS
Cayla Dean, NOS
Ginger Hinchcliff, NOS*
Donna Johnson, NOS
Audra Luscher, NOS
Brenna Sweetman, NOS*
Kate Abshire, NWS*
Karen Bareford, OAR*
Jocelyn Burston, NWS
Margaret Hurwitz, NWS
Mary Mullusky, NWS
Jen Sprague, NWS
Michelle Stokes, NWS/ReCo
Nancy Beller-Simms, OAR*
Veva Deheza, OAR
Kola Garber, OAR
Meredith Muth, OAR
Claudia Nierenburg, OAR*
Elizabeth Rohring, OAR
Chris Lauer, Chief Economist's Office
*Service Delivery Writing Team Member
Members of this team represent all of NOAA’s line offices, and years of experience in the field of engagement and the
development of user-driven science, products, and services.
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 19 OF 20
SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORKLAST UPDATED AUGUST 17, 2020 PAGE 20 OF 20