8
For Undergraduate Research Week, though, you can expect your audience to be somewhere in
between. While the Undergraduate Research Showcase is in an academic context, you are presenting
to peers who may not be in your field, as well as faculty, staff, friends, family, and alumni.
W
hat Should You Talk About?
The general order of information that you should present is very similar to the structure of an abstract.
You are encouraged to not spend too much time describing your background or literature review and
instead focus on sharing your own research or creative project.
Presentations should cover the following six sections:
I. What is your topic? Begin by sharing your topic and briefly touch on any context or background
information that is necessary for the audience to understand your project.
II. What is your research question or creative inquiry? Clearly state your question or inquiry.
III. What do we know about that topic already? Briefly guide the audience through the existing
literature or scholarship relevant to your topic.
IV. What did you do? When presenting your methods and findings, you should thoroughly describe
your project design and process. Talk about things such as your methodologies, approach, and
data collection methods if it’s appropriate for your project.
V. What did you find/expect to find? Share a few findings from your research or creative process
that informed your project. If your project is still in progress, what is the status of your work?
You can share preliminary findings or an overview of what you expect to happen.
VI. Conclusion. Consider including a few takeaway points of your major findings, the next steps for
your project, or the significance of your project. Examples of talking points include why your
research or creative project is significant, if it has implications for your field, if there is a current
event that can benefit from your research, or if it directly impacts a community.
Co
ntent: Do’s and Don’ts
When presenting your project, you should:
• Focus on your contribution
• Follow conventional structures for your field: In some research approaches, such as critical
theory and art, it is conventional for authors to talk about their own positionality to their
projects.
• Limit talking points to key information
• Comment on the broader relevance of your findings
• Explain terminology in the presentation
You should avoid:
• Using jargon
• Using too many citations
• Self-talk (i.e., narrating your internal dialogue)
• Trying to explain your entire project
• Using technical terms without explaining what they mean