Date submitted: 14/06/2010
Going Green in North American Public Libraries:
A Critical Snapshot of Policy and Practice
Rodney Al
University of Alberta and City of Edmonton
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Sara House
University of Alberta and Fort McMurray Public Library
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Meeting:
135. Environmental Sustainability and Libraries SIG
WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY
10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden
http://www.ifla.org/en/ifla76
Abstract:
In recent years, the global library community has recognized that reversing the human
impact on the environment is part of its social responsibility. This presentation examines this
ethic within the context of the North American library community with particular attention to
analysis of related policy and practice in five major metropolitan areas. Topics treated
include the development of “green” policies, procedures, strategic plans, mission statements,
vision statements, and values statements; and, “green librarianship” apparent at the service
level of select library associations and institutions. Findings indicate that there is an exciting
emergent library discourse on “green” policy and actions. However: (1) public libraries are
implementing “green” measures at the service and programming levels, but not yet encoding
a green ethic in official institutional language; and, (2) library associations are generally
remiss in addressing environmental responsibility in any form or manner in their policies.
Audience contribution is encouraged on how to build better green momentum in North
American librarianship, as well as how to develop a more socially responsible global
profession in general. To what extent is the slim and slow greening of libraries reflective of
the status of grassroots and activist librarianship in general?
Page 2 of 13
In 1962, Rachel Carson's book, Silent Spring, provided a wakeup call for humanity,
emphasising the important role we play in affecting our planet and our environment. Since
then the environmental movement has gained momentum, and more people want to make
changes at home and at work – ensuring they live a sustainable lifestyle. This societal shift
has been adopted by the library community, with associations and institutions increasingly
taking steps to make their organizations environmentally sustainable. For example, in 1989
the American Library Association established the Task Force on the Environment (TFoE) as
"one of the issues-oriented task forces that comprise the Social Responsibility Round Table
(SRRT)" (ALA, TFoE). The TFoE demonstrates the library community's commitment to
"promote awareness of environmental issues," and play a leadership role to ensure
librarianship is environmentally sustainable. This essay examines the development of ‘green’
policies and practices in North American library associations and five public libraries in
Canada and in the United States.
Methodology
This study is not intended to serve as a comprehensive resource on the topic. Rather, the
project offers a broad perspective on the current development of ‘green librarianship’ in
North American public libraries. For this project, ‘green librarianship’ refers to services and
policies meant to positively affect the environment; and ‘green libraries’ are library
institutions that employ these services, practices, and policies. Our study is limited to
national and regional library associations and to public libraries in five major metropolitan
areas of Canada and the United States. We reviewed policies, practices and initiatives as
found in their official statements of commitment, including policies, strategic plans,
managerial or administrative decisions, as well as programming, products, and services that
reflect significant commitment by the corporate body concerning ‘green librarianship’ or
‘green libraries’.
The parameters of our search evolved as we completed our literature review, but the
methodology and search terms remained constant throughout. Our review included electronic
databases, Internet search engines, and library and library association websites. To collect
the most relevant material, we used the following search terms and phrases: green, going
green, sustainability, eco, environmentalism and recycle.
1
While these terms are not
necessarily interchangeable, they all relate to ‘green’ concepts. It should also be noted, that
the project focuses only on policies and documents that were readily available online.
Literature Review
Literature on ‘green libraries’ took root in the early 1990s in publications such as The Green
Library Journal and from the work of authors like C. Atton (Anotnelli 2). After this initial
rush, the subject’s popularity cooled until 2003, when “going green” was again recognized as
an important topic. Publications such as the Oregon Library Association Quarterly (OLA
Quarterly Winter 2007) have devoted entire issues to the subject, while trade journals, blogs,
and other grassroots publications have increasingly encouraged libraries to practice green
librarianship (Anotnelli 2-3).
1
Monika Antonelli describes these terms in her article The Green Library Movement.
Page 3 of 13
Green Facilities
One of the key messages in the literature is the need for library associations to encourage the
construction of sustainable library buildings. The reason for this is simple. Bill Brown
writes:
Well-designed green buildings cost less to operate and maintain than conventionally
constructed buildings. They use less energy and natural resources. They are better
integrated into their sites and communities. They are more comfortable, enjoy more
daylight, and are more attractive to customers and employees. (Brown 61)
And, as Wanda Urbanska notes: "Building a green library may represent the largest public
statement any community can make to show its support for sustainability" (53).
LEED certification (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design) is the most commonly
accepted standard for environmentally-friendly building design. The literature profiles
numerous libraries that have obtained LEED certification. In 2004, Fayetteville Public
Library (AR and the Semiahmoo Branch of Surrey Public Library (BC) became two of the
first LEED certified library buildings in North America (Miller; Urbanska). Sources like The
Green Library Blog focus entirely on "library facilities, substantive general work relating to
Green Buildings and Sustainability", and there are many other articles about ‘green’ building
construction and certification (Brown; Mikkelsen). Interestingly, the literature makes almost
no reference to other standards for ‘green’ buildings – such as Green Globes, Build It Green,
and BOMA BESt.
The literature also notes that municipalities, both in Canada and the United States, support
‘green buildings’ with policies that require new civic buildings to achieve LEED certification
(e.g. Chicago, IL and Calgary, AB). These municipal policies will, no doubt, increase the
number of ‘green’ public library buildings in the years to come.
Green Initiatives
While the literature on green libraries has primarily focused on infrastructure certification,
the literature has also highlighted smaller initiatives that libraries take in their quest to “go
green.” Monika Antonelli notes that not all libraries can afford to pursue extravagant
renovations and should be encouraged to implement even small environmentally responsible
changes into their operations (Anotnelli 4). Furthermore, Wanda Urbanska states that
“[r]educing, reusing, and recycling paper tends to be the first order of business when a library
goes green” and these small steps can be the beginning of something much larger. Along
these lines, Judith Norton discusses how a library can conduct an environmental audit to
determine the ways that they may develop sustainable policies; Rebekkah Smith Adlrich
argues that libraries should obtain the services of a "sustainable building advisor." Megan
Coder and Meredith Walker outline small, but significant, changes that librarians can
implement for "greener" buildings, such as choosing appliances and electronics with eco-
labels.
Page 4 of 13
The literature about ‘green librarianship’ also notes that libraries and librarians are public
educators and leaders, making even small steps toward sustainability a clear demonstration
of this leadership (Deeper Green, The Green Library Blog, Becken). The literature
acknowledges libraries as leaders in implementing ‘green’ activities including: providing
access to electronic material, using energy efficient products, providing collections on the
environment, offering opportunities to telecommute, suggestions for ‘green’ transportation,
and processing e-waste (Going Green @your Library Blog, Antonelli, OLA Quarterly).
Overall, the literature has offered suggestions and examples of how libraries can “go green”
and adapt their policies and procedures to be environmental leaders in their communities.
Research Findings
The Canadian Experience
The study found almost one hundred citations about official ‘green’ policies, plans, and
practices among Canadian library associations and public libraries. References to ‘green’
planning and practices by library associations were relatively small in number and none of
the library associations addressed ‘green’ issues in their mission, values, or strategic plans,
and for two of the regional associations there were no ‘green’ references found. Both the
Canadian and Ontario Library Associations referred to ‘green’ issues in their policies, but
these references were in passing, and were not entrenched in their mission, values or library
policies. This said, our review did reveal at least one strength among Canadian library
associations, that being their push to host regional and national conferences as ’green events’
by making positive environmental choices when planning and organizing the conference.
The Ontario Library Association leads its peers in this regard with a full slate of ‘green’
initiatives for their annual conference. These include encouraging delegates to utilize
reusable bags, posting documents to a conference website (in place of printed handouts),
hosting a green blog, providing recycling service, offering online conference registration, and
highlighting ‘green initiatives’ by commercial exhibitors (OLA Super Conference 2007,
2008, 2009, 2010). While other library association conferences are taking similar steps, the
Ontario Library Association is clear and consistent in their efforts to host a ‘green’
conference.
References to ‘green’ actions and policies are more prevalent at the public library level, but
the majority still lack ‘green’ values in their mission and values statements, or current
strategic plans. Ottawa and Calgary were the only public libraries to have established ‘green’
policies; however, the "Environmental Sustainability" policy from Ottawa Public Library
merely states that "the Library's practices for environmental sustainability are not inconsistent
with those of the City of Ottawa" (OPL Environmental Sustainability, CPL Board Policies).
The Vancouver and Toronto Public Libraries also include "sustainability" as a strategic focus,
but only as applied to funding, workforce, and client support, not the environment (VPL
Vision and Plan 2015, TPL Strategic Plan 2008-2011, OPL Environmental Sustainability).
Unfortunately, no references to ‘green librarianship’ could be found from the Reseau des
Bibliothèques de Montreal, in spite of searches in English and French.
While library associations have been slow to adopt official policies on ‘green librarianship’
Calgary, Edmonton, and Ottawa public libraries have each adopted a ‘green plan’ (EPL
Board Meeting; CPL Eco-Action blog; White Paper on Greening). The Calgary and
Edmonton plans were inaccessible to the public, and Ottawa’s "Go Green" plan appeared to
Page 5 of 13
be an assessment of current initiatives by other public libraries (with possible directions for
Ottawa Public Library). Nonetheless, the existence of these ‘green’ plans suggests that these
organizations are committed to transforming themselves from the inside out.
Beyond plans and policies, Canadian public libraries have many ‘green’ initiatives, ranging
from the building of LEED-certified facilities to publicity campaigns and an "Eco-Action"
blog. To understand the overall focus and impact of these projects, they were classified
according to the following seven categories: buildings, waste, transportation, food, pollution,
landscapes, and procurement. Table 1 demonstrates that green infrastructure was the most
commonly cited type of initiative, followed by reducing waste (especially paper, printing, and
recycling issues). There were relatively few references to transportation, food, pollution, or
procurement found in the study. References to landscapes were mostly about two specific
public libraries that have created green roofs (roof-top gardens) at their institutions (Central
Library FAQ).
Buildings Waste Transportation Food Pollution Landscapes Procurement
20 9 5 1 2 6 3
Table 1: Web references by Canadian public libraries to ‘green’ projects
In general, Canadian libraries are implementing many different initiatives that address
environmental sustainability. Some of these are, just recently, being linked through
institutional ‘green plans.’ Meanwhile, public library boards are starting to adopt
sustainability as part of the guiding principles. However, library associations lag behind their
institutional and individual members in adopting broad environmental principles and
practices.
The American Experience
To gain an understanding of environmental policy and activities in the American library
community, the study reviewed various library associations and the five largest municipal
public libraries. This review focused on the American Library Association, regional
associations, and some state associations that have shown an interest in ‘green’ activities.
The American Library Association remains a leader in promoting environmental
responsibility in North America. In 1989, the ALA established the Task Force on the
Environment as a part of their Social Responsibility Round Table (ALA TFOE). The Task
Force was created to “promote” environmental issues and to "unite librarians and
informational professionals" (ALA TFOE). Today, TFOE demonstrates the American Library
Association's commitment to ‘green libraries’ and education through programs such as
"Grassroots Greening" and Earth Wind and Fire @ Your Library (TFOE, SRRT, Grassroots
Greening). From a public library perspective, the ALA and its sub organization the Public
Library Association, promote the education of patrons in "environmental literacy" through
library programs that connects users with "green volunteer opportunities” (PLA
Environmental Literacy). In terms of actions taken or adopted by other library associations in
the United States, the only relevant reference is from the 2009 Pacific Northwest Library
Association conference, when attendees were asked to bring bags they had received during
Page 6 of 13
previous conferences from home and the conference held a contest for the oldest bag and the
bag that traveled the furthest (PNLA, Greening your Library).
To understand ‘green’ policies and practices among American public libraries, we reviewed
the Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, Philadelphia, and Chicago public libraries; including
official documents as well as information about ‘green’ practices and activities in our search.
The results demonstrate that American public libraries are taking action to ‘green’ their
infrastructure, activities and educational programs in an effort to represent their community's
wants and needs, but very few have changed their formal statements to reflect these actions.
As with public libraries in Canada, there is a shift toward building green. The New York
Public Library, Chicago Public Library, Los Angeles Public Library and the Philadelphia
Free library have all incorporated ‘green buildings’ and “eco-construction” to lessen the
environmental impact of their new and renovated branches (Los Angeles' Public Library
Silver Lake Branch, New York's Bronx Library Centre and Philadelphia's Parkway Central to
name a few) and the Detroit Public Library is currently in the process of improving their
facilities to meet “green initiatives” (Detroit Green Task Force meeting minutes). The
individual libraries have promoted and supported their ‘green’ buildings by announcing their
construction in strategic plans, annual reports, and board minutes, as achievements or goals
for the institution (Los Angeles Public Library Strategic Plan, 2007-2010 and New York
Public Library Annual report, 2007) or through establishing committees to oversee these
projects, as in the case of Chicago Public Library (Chicago Board of Directors meeting
January 2010).
In their construction, many of the new buildings have been created using recyclable or
recycled material and much of the removed material is recycled or sold and reused by other
organizations (American Libraries Green Libraries; LA Times, Libraries to Recycle Bricks,
Windows; LA 1998 Library Board Program; Rooflite, Philadelphia Free Library Green Roof
Install Video). Many of these buildings have met LEED standards including silver
certification for the Bronx Library Centre, gold certification for the Silver Lake Branch and
Platinum certification for the Lake View Terrace Branch of Los Angeles' Public Library
(American Libraries, Green Libraries and NYPL Bronx Centre).
While most of the references from these American public libraries focused on ‘green
buildings’, there is also a clear presence of other ‘green’ initiatives adopted by these
institutions. For example, the Chicago Public Library has a drop off point for battery
recycling (City of Chicago How to Recycle Batteries) and the Philadelphia Public Library
sells donated books through their "Friends of the Library", or gives donated books back to the
community through a "Books for friends" program that reuses nearly twelve thousand books
annually (Friends of the Free Library Philadelphia, The book corner).
Many of the libraries in these American cities have also offered ‘green’ or sustainability
themed programming; including programs about creating jewellery from recycled material,
reading ‘green’ literature, and engaging with the outdoors. Both the Chicago and New York
public libraries have established environmental education programs to engage the
community. Specifically, the Chicago Public Library is offering “Read Green, Live Green”,
which encourages Chicagoans to read material that discusses the environment and "ways to
work toward creating a healthier planet" (CPL Read Green, Live Green) and the New York
Public Library is offering a new outdoor learning environment to provide educational and
Page 7 of 13
programming opportunities for children and families outdoors (American Libraries New
York Breaks New Ground).
Discussion & Analysis: Are North American public libraries green enough?
Disappointingly, regional library associations in the United States and Canada have done
little towards developing official ‘green’ policies or practices. This said, many state and
provincial library associations, including Oregon, New York, California, Ontario, and British
Columbia, are incorporating environmental practices into their conferences and programming
(OLA, NYLA, CLA, OLA, BCLA). With the exception of the American Library Association,
we found no other national library association with a formal statement on the responsibility of
libraries to the environment. Adopting formal policies or positions statements would cement
the library community’s support for environmental responsibility and would validate
initiatives that put environmental responsibility into action (IFLA Statement on Libraries and
Sustainable Development). This applies directly to Canada, where the national association
currently has no such position statement.
There are obvious similarities when comparing ‘green’ initiatives by libraries in Canada and
the United States. Libraries in both countries have increasingly achieved LEED certification
for new buildings, and public libraries in both countries promote ‘green’ initiatives and offer
‘green’ programs. However, there was a striking difference in official statements about
environmental responsibility among public libraries in the two countries. While none of the
five public libraries in the United States directly mentioned environmental issues in their
mission, vision or publicly-available policies, almost all the Canadian libraries did. Two
Canadian libraries (Calgary and Ottawa) had policy statements and three Canadian libraries
have developed ‘green’ plans to implement their environmental responsibility (Calgary,
Edmonton, and Ottawa). This discrepancy suggests that public libraries in the United States
need to add ‘green’ considerations to their formal policies and statements. However, for
some American libraries, their connection with the municipality and civic policies may be
another reason why ‘going green’ has yet to emerge in official library policy. Their
relationship with the municipality may allow them to piggy back on the formal statements
already in place (e.g. the City of Chicago has developed its own environmental building
standards and Los Angeles Public Library, who participate in a recycling program developed
by the county of Los Angeles, see County of Los Angeles Strategic plan). Likewise, public
libraries such as New York have established value statements committing themselves to
strengthening the community, which may be considered a promise to act on behalf of their
communities in every respect including the environment (We’re Going Green! New York
Public Library).
The actions among the five public libraries in Canada and the United States can be
considered representative of the actions being undertaken throughout North America. In
2009, a library school student from the University of North Carolina created a directory of
North American libraries that have implemented ‘green’ building, planning and policies. The
map plots school, academic and public libraries, as well as other educational institutions, and
includes links to their ‘green’ buildings and ‘green’ features (Green Directories). This
resource, while not complete, provides an important list of references and includes analysis
regarding the ‘greening’ of North American libraries.
Page 8 of 13
The resource provides a list of six steps a library should take, noting that staff should
continue to “monitor the library's progress in the measures you have implemented,” and
“return to step one to identify additional areas for improvement. Green planning is never
done!” (Green Directory).
Another theme found in the Canadian and American examples, is the notion that public
libraries are inherently ‘green.’ Libraries share resources across the community (such as
books) and they foster a number of sustainable initiatives such as reusing, recycling, and
reducing. These are ‘green’ activities and public libraries have started to market themselves
as ‘green’ based on these basic principles both of librarianship and of environmental
responsibility. This line of argument suggests that libraries can make a ‘greener world’
simply by raising their profile and being better libraries. The Calgary Public Library
promoted this image with a publicity campaign titled “Green, Before Green Was Cool”.
While there is merit to this argument, public libraries should be wary of ‘green washing’–
making environmental claims beyond the substance of their efforts (Koh). Public libraries
may provide ‘green’ services, but this does not absolve public libraries from taking steps to
increase their environmental responsibility and decrease their environmental footprint.
By creating environmentally sustainable facilities and offering environmentally focused
programming, libraries in both Canada and the United States have connected themselves with
the developing ideals of the communities they serve and represent. Thomas Frey, in his report
The Future of Libraries: Beginning the Great Transformation, argues that libraries will move
from being “a center of information to a center of culture.” Antonelli builds on this argument
suggesting that “[e]conomic instability, energy depletion, and planetary degradation are
transforming society, and in turn transforming libraries” (7). The resources we collected
reflect this transformation as ‘green libraries’ and ‘green librarianship’ are striking “a chord
with the community” and public libraries are designing their buildings and programs to
reflect this spirit. Although the evidence of ‘green’ library policies is not overwhelming, a
movement towards ‘green’ policies is evident.
Our findings did not indicate where this push toward ‘green’ policies comes from, but it
seems clear that most ‘green’ initiatives were developed by enthusiastic and dedicated
librarians and library staff at the ‘grassroots’ level, while some other projects may have come
from user requests, Board interest, City councils, or in response to market surveys. The next
step will be to develop official statements and policies to reflect the desires of patrons and
individual libraries, for, as mentioned in the Ottawa Public Library “Go Green” plan
“successfully adopting sustainability in the OPL requires the recognition that greening
touches upon the entire organizational structure” (OPL).
Conclusion
As our research and findings demonstrate, libraries in both Canada and the United States are
clearly taking steps to reduce their impact on the environment and to promote environmental
responsibility in the communities they serve. We found that most changes are happening at a
local level through initiatives undertaken by librarians and library staff. The next steps
require library associations in Canada and the United States, at state, provincial, regional and
even national levels, to adopt formal statements on environmental responsibility. As well,
public libraries in both countries should adopt environmental responsibility as part of their
Page 9 of 13
institutional principles and make their intentions clearly known to the public. These gestures
will position public libraries in North America as advocates for environmental responsibility.
WORKS CITED
Aldrich, Rebekkah Smith. “A Deeper Green”. Library Journal 135.5 (2010): 45. Print.
ALA Connect: Green Libraries. American Library Association. Web. 3 April 2010.
<http://connect.ala.org/node/71711>
Antonelli, Monika. “The Green Library Movement : An Overview of Green Library
Literature Since 1979 to the Future of Green Libraries”. EGJ 27 (Fall 2008). Web. 1
April 2010. <http://escholarship.org/uc/item/39d3v236
>
Becken, Bill. “Librarians: Go Green in an Era of Tight Energy”. Searcher 17.9 (Oct
2009): 16-19, 55. Print.
Brown, Bill. “The New Green Standard.” Library Journal. 128.20 (Dec 2003): 61-64.
Print.
Coder, Megan. “It's Not Easy Being Green: Or is it?” College & Research Libraries
News 69.11 (2008): 692-694. Print.
Frey, Thomas. “The Future of Libraries: Beginning the Great Transformation.”
FuturistSpeaker.com. n.d. Web. 31 May 2010.
<http://www.futuristspeaker.com/2006/11/the-future-of-libraries/
>
Going Green @Your Library. n.p., n.d. Web. 2 April 2010.
<http://greeningyourlibrary.wordpress.com/>
“The Green Libraries Directory.” Green Libraries
. n.p., 31 March 2010. Web. 27 April
2010. <http://www.unc.edu/~cblair/greenlibraries/greenlibrariesdirectory.html
>
Greg. “Wanda Urbanska at The 2009 ALA Annual Conference.” American Libraries.
American Library Association. 21 July 2009. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://alfocus.ala.org/videos/wanda-urbanska-2009-ala-annual-conference>
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). Statement on
Libraries and Sustainable Development. 2002. Web. 3 April 2010.
<http://www.un.org/jsummit/html/documents/summit_docs/background_papers/3108
_background_paper8.pdf>
Koh, Michelle. “The Gold Behind the Green.” Asia City Online. 20 June 2008. Web.
31 May 2010. <http://is.asia-city.com/city-living/article/gold-behind-green>
Page 10 of 13
Mikkelsen, June. “Going for the Gold: Building a Sustainable LEED Library.” OLA
Quarterly 13.4 (Winter 2007): 12-18. Print.
Miller, Trish. “Canada’s First ‘Green’ Library.” Feliciter 50.6 (2004): 254. Print.
Norton, Judith. “A How-To: Conduct An Environmental Audit in your library”. Oregon
Library Association Quarterly 13.4. (2007): 7-12. Print.
The Green Library Blog. Blogspot.com. n.p., 2010. Web. 3 April 2010.
<http://thegreenlibraryblog.blogspot.com/>
Urbanska, Wanda. "A Greener Library, A Greener You." American Libraries 40.4
(2009): 52-5. Print.
Walker, Meredith. “100 Ways to Make Your Library a Little Greener.” Learn-gasm.
BachelorsDegreeOnline.com, 21 April 2009. Web. 1 April 2010.
<http://www.bachelorsdegreeonline.com/blog/2009/100-ways-to-make-your-library-a-
little-greener/>
Canadian Libraries & Library Associations
Board Policy A.14, Environmental Sustainability. Ottawa Public Library/Bibliothèque
publique d’Ottawa.14 December 2009. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://biblioottawalibrary.ca/archive/board/2009/091214/091214_8.pdf>
Calgary Public Library: Board Policies. Calgary Public Library. June 2006. Web. 28
March 2010.
<http://blog.calgarypubliclibrary.com/blogs/cpl_foundation/CPL%20Board%20Policie
s%20last%20updated%202006.pdf>
Calgary Public Library: Eco-Action. [blog] Calgary Public Library. 2010. Web. 28
March 2010. <http://blog.calgarypubliclibrary.com/blogs/eco_action/default.aspx
>
Central Library FAQ. Vancouver Public Library. 2010. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://www.vpl.ca/branches/generic/central_library_faq
>
Minutes of the Edmonton Public Library Board Meeting. Edmonton Public Library. 11
March 2008. Web. 28 March 2010. <http://www.epl.ca/LibraryBoard/>
Ontario Library Association Super Conference 2007. Ontario Library Association.
2007. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://www.accessola.com/superconference2007/index.html>
Page 11 of 13
Ontario Library Association Super Conference 2008. Ontario Library Association.
2008. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://www.accessola.com/superconference2008/index.html>
Ontario Library Association Super Conference 2009. Ontario Library Association.
2009. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://www.accessola.com/superconference2009/index.html>
Ontario Library Association Super Conference 2010. Ontario Library Association.
2010. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://www.accessola.com/superconference2010/index.html>
Our Shared Stories: Writing the Future of Toronto’s Library – Toronto Public Library
Strategic Plan 2008-2011. Toronto Public Library. n.d. Web. 27 March 2010.
<http://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/strategicplan/strat_plan.pdf>
The Vancouver Public Library: Vision and Plan 2015. Vancouver Public Library.
January 2009. n.d. Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://www.vpl.vancouver.bc.ca/images/uploads/file/pdf/VPL_Vision_2015_APRIL0
9_WEB.pdf>
White Paper on Greening: The Ottawa Public Libraries. Ottawa Public
Library/Bibliothèque publique d’Ottawa. McMurray Environmental Solutions. n.d.
Web. 28 March 2010.
<http://biblioottawalibrary.ca/archive/board/2009/090420/090420_P2.pdf>
United States Libraries & Library Associations
American Libraries. Green Libraries: Los Angeles Public Library. (2010). Web. 2
April 2010. <http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/content/green-libraries-los-
angeles-public-library-silver-lake-branch>
American Libraries. New York Library Breaks New Ground with Nature Explorium.
(24 March 2010). Web. 2 April 2010.<http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/green-
your-library/new-york-library-breaks-new-ground-nature-explorium>
American Library Association. Task Force on the Environment. (2010). Web. 31
March 2010. <http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/rts/srrt/tfoe/taskforceenvironment.cfm>
Building on Success: Los Angeles Public Library Strategic Plan 2007-2010. Los
Angeles Public Library (2007). Web June 2 2010.
<http://www.lapl.org/about/Strategic_Plan.pdf >
Chicago Public Library. Read Green, Live Green. (2010). Web. 3 April 2010
<http://www.chipublib.org/events/details/id/7295/>
Page 12 of 13
City of Chicago: Recycling and Waste Management. How to Recycle Batteries.
(2010). Web. 1 April 2010.
<http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/doe/supp_info/how_to_recycle_batteries.
html>
Chicago Board of Directors meeting January 2010. (January 10, 2010). Web June 3,
2010. < http://www.chipublib.org/dir_documents/boardm_jan10.pdf>
Detroit Green Task Force. (February 18, 2010). Web 3 June 2010.
<http://www.greeningdetroit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Detroit-Green-Task-
Force-Meeting-2-18-10-v2.pdf>
Friends of the Free Library Philadelphia. The Book Corner. Web. 1 April 2010.
<http://www.libraryfriends.info/book-corner/index.php>
Going Green @ Your library. [blog] Conference Bag Exchange Idea. (15 March
2010). Web. 2 April 2010.
<http://greeningyourlibrary.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/conference-bag-exchange-
idea/>
Los Angele’s Times. California: Library designed with community in mind (19
November 2009). Web April 2, 2010.
<http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov/16/local/me-library16>
Los Angeles’ Public Library. Los Angeles 1998 Library Board Program. (1998). Web.
2 April 2010. <http://www.lapl.org/about/BondAnnRept2007.pdf>
Los Angeles’ Time. Libraries to recycle bricks, windows. (24 October 2000). Web. 31
March 2010. <http://articles.latimes.com/2000/oct/24/local/me-41078
>
New York Public Library. Bronx Library Centre. (2010). Web. 31 March 2010.
<http://www.nypl.org/locations/bronx-library-center
>
New York Public Library. It’s Easy Being Green.(18 March 2010). Web 2 April
2010.<http://www.nypl.org/press/press-release/2010/03/17/it%E2%80%99s-easy-
being-green-new-york-public-library%E2%80%99s-brand-new-battery-par>
New York Public Library. We’re Going Green! (2010). Web 3 June 2010. <
http://www.nypl.org/node/78621?hpfeature=2>
New York Public Library. New York Public Library Annual Report, 2007. (2007) Web
June 3 2010. < http://www.nypl.org/sites/default/files/2007AnnualReport.pdf>
Oregon Library Association. OLA2009. (2009). Web. 1 April 2010.
<http://www.olaweb.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=85385&orgId=ola>
Page 13 of 13
Rooflite. Philadelphia Free Library Green Roof Install Video. (14 October 2009).
Web. 3 April 2010. <http://rooflite.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/philadelphia-free-
library-green-roof-install-video/>
Social Responsibilities Round Table. Grassroots Greening. (2009). Web. 3 April
2010. <http://libr.org/srrt/news/srrt168.html#11>