Professional Practice
Clinical pharmacists are licensed professionals with
advanced education and training who practice in all
types of patient care settings. They participate as
members of the health care team to provide high-qual-
ity, coordinated, patient-centered care to ensure that
individuals and populations achieve the best possi-
ble outcomes from their medications. Clinical phar-
macists assess medication-related needs, evaluate
medication therapy, develop and implement plans of
care, and provide follow-up evaluation and medica-
tion monitoring in collaboration with other members
of the health care team. In the course of this prac-
tice, clinical pharmacists interpret diagnostic and lab-
oratory tests, identify the most appropriate drug and
nondrug therapies, and teach patients and caregiv-
ers about medications and how to use them. They
also serve as health care researchers, university and
college faculty, medication information specialists,
organizational leaders, consultants, and authors of
books and articles on pharmacology and medication
therapy.
Education
Today’s clinical pharmacists complete 6–8 years of
undergraduate and professional education leading to
the doctor of pharmacy (Pharm.D.) degree, including
2–3 years of coursework that emphasizes pharma-
cology and the clinical assessment, monitoring, and
treatment of disease; and 1–2 years in supervised,
direct patient care settings, where, as members of the
health care team, they engage in the assessment,
treatment, monitoring, and teaching of patients. They
also complete 1–2 years of accredited postgraduate
residency training as licensed clinical practitioners,
where they work in team-based settings under the
guidance of expert practitioners in clinical pharma-
cy and other health disciplines. Clinical pharmacists
achieve board certication in their area(s) of special-
ization and maintain competence through recertica-
tion, mandatory continuing education, and self-direct-
ed continuous professional development.
Accountability
As accountable members of the health care team,
clinical pharmacists establish and maintain written
collaborative practice agreements with individual
physicians, medical groups, or health systems and/
or practice under formally granted clinical privileges
from the medical staff or credentialing system of the
organization in which they practice. These agree-
ments, together with state pharmacy practice acts,
confer specic authorities, responsibilities, and ac-
countabilities to the clinical pharmacist. Clinical phar-
macists are committed to promoting quality care that
improves patients’ health outcomes. This is accom-
plished by leading and participating in health care
organizations, conducting research, disseminating
research ndings, and applying these ndings to clin-
ical practice.
Responsibility
Clinical pharmacists have a covenantal, “ducial” re-
lationship with their patients. This relationship relies
on the trust placed in the clinical pharmacist by the
patient and the commitment of the clinical pharmacist
to act in the best interests of individual patients and
patient populations. Clinical pharmacists exhibit the
traits of professionalism: responsibility, commitment
to excellence, respect for others, honesty and integ-
rity, and care and compassion. They subscribe to the
pharmacy profession’s code of ethics and adhere to
all pharmacist-related legal and ethical standards.
Clinical pharmacists also assume responsibility for
advancing their discipline through involvement in pro-
fessional societies and participation in health policy
at local, state, national, and international levels.
Practice Advancement
Issue Brief
1
Payment Models, Part 2 August 2018
Purpose
ACCP Pracce Advancement Issue Briefs are developed
and published to provide concise informaon and
insights for clinical pharmacists and their medical and
pracce administraon colleagues involved in direct
paent care. They are intended to help support the
development, advancement, and posioning of clinical
pharmacists as integrated direct paent care providers
within team-based medical pracces and delivery
systems. The issue briefs are regularly updated to ensure
alignment with developments in the advancement of
clinical pharmacy pracce.*
The informaon contained in these issue briefs can
be useful in both inial and ongoing discussions and
decisions about the scope of services and collaborave
pracce responsibilies of clinical pharmacists,
parcularly when physicians or medical administrators
are exploring or being encouraged to consider
incorporang or expanding clinical pharmacists
within pracces. The greatest ulity and value of this
informaon may lie in supporng specic conversaons
with medical directors, nance and revenue directors,
pracce managers, and others involved in the business
operaons of pracces once the decision to incorporate
or increase the number of clinical pharmacists within
the pracce has been made.
Background
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorizaon Act
of 2015 (MACRA) established compensaon models
focused on shiing health care from fee-for-service to
value-based care with a payment approach called the
Quality Payment Program (QPP). The QPP is focused
on rewarding the delivery of high-quality paent care
through two avenues: the Merit-Based Incenve
Payment System (MIPS) and advanced Alternave
Payment Models (advanced APMs).
1
How Pharmacists Can Add Value Under MIPS
Inially, most eligible providers will fall into MIPS, which
aims to shi payment to Medicare Part B clinicians using
a performance-based payment model. The pracce will
receive bonuses or penales, depending on the quality
and cost of the care provided. CMS determines the
payment adjustments according to a MIPS composite
score with four performance categories: quality,
promong interoperability (PIs), improvement acvies
(IAs), and cost.
2,3
MIPs-eligible clinicians will have to choose and report
the acvies and measures most meaningful to their
pracce. Although pharmacists are not currently
MIPS-eligible clinicians, they can contribute to the
key performance categories, given that pharmacists
Payment Methods in Outpatient Team-Based Clinical
Pharmacy Practice, Part 2: MACRA for Pharmacists
*ACCP Clinical Pracce Advancement Resources include issue briefs, products, services, and educaonal resources essenal for integraon
of clinical pharmacy services into contemporary team-based health care delivery. Topic areas include, but are not limited to, Standards of
Pracce; Clinical Services Operaons (e.g., payment mechanisms, collaborave pracce agreements and business structures); Medicaon
Use Quality Improvement through Outcome Measurement; and Leadership in Pracce Advancement and Transformaon.
2
Payment Models, Part 2 August 2018
can directly inuence many of the medicaon-related
measures (Table 1) such as chronic ancoagulaon
therapy, persistence of β-blocker treatment aer
a heart aack, and adherence to anpsychoc
medicaons for individuals with schizophrenia. While
Table 1 specically analyzes these medicaon-related
measures, pharmacists can also indirectly contribute
to many more of the quality and improvement acvity
measures, such as managing pain control for paents
within 48 hours, establishing standard operaons to
manage transions of care, and engagement of paents,
family and caregivers in developing a plan of care.
Chronic care management consumes 37% of primary
care providers’ me. This oen entails managing com-
plex medicaon regimens.
4
Pharmacists who are inte-
grated into a value-based model can focus on the med-
icated-related measures of MIPS so that physicians and
other members of the care team can focus on their
respecve measures to achieve highest value and cost
savings. Pharmacists can also play an essenal role in
developing and priorizing services in order to align
them to the performance measures through discussions
with the organizaon’s leaders.
5
In addion to contribung directly to the MIPS
performance measures in a wide range of primary care
and specialty pracces, pharmacists have an enhanced
opportunity to contribute in paent-centered medical
homes (PCMHs),
6
which automacally receive full credit
in the IA category.
7
Because IAs contribute 15% to the
composite score for payment, it would be strategic for
pharmacists to leverage their value and integrate into
PCMH sengs, given that PCMHs are beer organized
to meet quality measures.
One of the most valuable ways pharmacists can con-
tribute to the PCMH is through providing comprehen-
sive medicaon management (CMM) services. CMM
is dened as the standard of care that ensures each
paent’s medicaons are individually assessed to deter-
mine whether they are appropriate for the paent,
eecve for the medical condion, safe given the
comorbidies and other medicaons being taken, and
able to be taken by the paent as intended.
8
Each year,
4.5 million adverse drug events are esmated to occur
in the ambulatory seng, associated with 400,000
hospitalizaons.
9
Return on investment of medicaon
management services has ranged from 3:1 to 12:1
annually, with the ability to decrease hospital
admissions, physician visits, emergency department
admissions, and the inappropriate use of medica-
ons.
10,11
By integrang CMM into a PCMH, paents’
medicaon use can be opmized, resulng in increased
quality and payment for the medical pracce.
6
How Pharmacists Can Add Value Under
Advanced APMs
Advanced APMs, such as the Next Generaon ACO
Model, Oncology Care Model, Comprehensive Primary
Care Plan program, and Comprehensive ESRD Care
Organizaons, use a payment approach that provides
added incenves to pracces that provide quality and
cost-ecient care to paents. Pracces can receive
higher bonuses in advanced APMs than in MIPS
because of the increased risk incurred by the pracce in
advanced APMs.
12
Currently, PCMHs are not considered
advanced APMs under MACRA. However, many of the
requirements to be a PCMH will posion pracces to
meet the requirements of an advanced APM. Having
pracces shi to an APM model is the ulmate goal
of MACRA. Therefore, pharmacists who can integrate
CMM within PCMHs can also contribute to the cost
savings in advanced APMs.
To sustain and enhance their revenue stream, providers
are adapng their business model to ensure value
generaon. The lack of discrete payment and billing for
pharmacists’ services has been a historical barrier to
integrang pharmacists into team-based care. However,
Table 1. Medicaon-Related MIPS Performance
Measures
Performance Measure
Category
a
% MIPs
Composite
Score
a
% Medicaon-
Related
Measures
b
Quality 50 ~25
Improvement
Acvies
15 ~25
Promong
Interoperability
25 ~20
Cost
c
10 N/A
a
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS). The quality payment program. Available from
www.qpp.cms.gov. Accessed August 29, 2018.
b
CMS measures in each category (275 for quality, 114 for improvement
acvies, 15 for promong interoperability) determined, according to
clinical judgment, to be medicaon related. The total number of medicaon-
related measures for each category was used to determine the percentage
of medicaon-related measures for the respecve category.
c
The two cost measures [Medicare Spending Per Beneciary (MSPB) and
Total Per Capita Costs (TPCC)] are not directly medicaon-related, however,
by contribung to the measures in the other categories, pharmacists may
help decrease these measures.
3
Payment Models, Part 2 August 2018
the MACRA environment allows pharmacists to be
increasingly integrated into the value-based model in
team-based pracces. For example, MACRA provides
an economic raonale for pracces to pay a salary for
pharmacists to be part of their team to drive health
outcomes and generate value-based revenue for the
pracce. Moreover, pharmacists can be embedded in
primary care pracces through a co-funded partnership
between the pracce and a health system or pharmacy
school. Organizaons may also create a shared resource
contractual agreement in which the pharmacist provides
medicaon management services for mulple pracces
that share the overhead costs.
5
As pharmacists’ involvement in value-based care
evolves and unl other payment mechanisms are in
place, pharmacists can now be seriously considered
for inclusion in team-based pracces because of the
improved health outcomes and enhanced value they
have been shown to produce. MACRA and its impact on
transioning health care to a value-based environment
posively incenvizes pracces to integrate pharmacists
into the team-based care structure.
References
1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare
program; Merit-Based Incenve Payment System (MIPS) and
Alternave Payment Model (APM) incenve under the physi-
cian fee schedule and criteria for physician-focused payment
models (81 FR 77008). Federal Register. November 4, 2016.
2. Manchikan L, Helm S II, Calodney AK, et al. Merit-
based incenve payment system: meaningful changes
in the nal rule brings cauous opmism. Pain Physician
2017;20:E1–E12.
3. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Resources
for the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorizaon
Act (MACRA). Available from www.aafp.org/pracce-
management/payment/medicare-payment.html. Accessed
August 28, 2018.
4. Ghorob A, Bodenheimer T. Sharing the care to improve
access to primary care. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1955–7.
5. Smith MA. Implemenng primary care pharmacist ser-
vices: go upstream in the world of value-based payment mod-
els. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017;13:892–5.
6. Smith MA, Bates DW, Bodenheimer T, Clearly PD. Why
pharmacists belong in the medical home. Health A
2010;29:906–13.
7. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Quality payment pro-
gram. Available from www.qpp.cms.gov. Accessed August 28,
2018.
8. Paent-Centered Primary Care Collaborave (PCPCC). The
paent-centered medical home: integrang comprehen-
sive medicaon management to opmize paent outcomes.
Available from www.pcpcc.org/sites/default/les/media/
medmanagement.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2018.
9. Sarkar U, Lopez A, Maselli JH, Gonzales R. Adverse drug
events in US adult ambulatory medical care. Health Serv Res
2011;46:1517–33.
10. Ises BJ, Schondelmeyer SW, Artz MB, et al. Clinical
and economic outcomes of medicaon therapy manage-
ment services: the Minnesota experience. J Am Pharm Assoc
2008;48:203–11.
11. Cipolle R, Strand L, Morley P. Pharmaceucal care prac-
ce: the clinician’s guide. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
12. Casalino LP. The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorizaon
Act and the corporate transformaon of American medicine.
Health A 2017;36:865–9.
Access this document online at:
www.accp.com/PAIB3
Disclaimer: This brief is provided for informaonal purposes only. It does not take into consideraon your specic circumstances or the
laws and regulaons of applicable jurisdicons. It should not be construed as legal or professional advice, or as a substute for obtaining
legal or professional advice. Addionally, ACCP disclaims all liability regarding any acons taken or not taken based on this brief.
Copyright ©2018 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. All rights reserved. This publicaon is protected by copyright. No part of
this publicaon may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmied, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopy, without prior wrien permission of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy.