Lazer, D.; Pentland, A.; Adamic, L.; Aral, S.; Barab
´
asi, A.-
L.; Brewer, D.; Christakis, N.; Contractor, N.; Fowler, J.;
Gutmann, M.; Jebara, T.; King, G.; Macy, M.; Roy, D.; and
Van Alstyne, M. 2009. Computational social science. Sci-
ence 323(5915):721–723.
Lee, J.-G.; Han, J.; and Whang, K.-Y. 2007. Trajectory
clustering: a partition-and-group framework. In Proc. ACM
Intl. Conf. on Management of data (SIGMOD), 593–604.
Lehmann, J.; Gonc¸alves, B.; Ramasco, J. J.; and Cattuto, C.
2012. Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In
Proc. Intl. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW), 251–260.
Lenser, S., and Veloso, M. 2005. Non-parametric time series
classification. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and
Automation (ICRA), 3918–3923.
Lerman, K., and Ghosh, R. 2010. Information contagion:
an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter
social networks. In Proc. Intl. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and
Social Media (ICWSM), 90–97.
Lerman, K., and Hogg, T. 2010. Using a model of social
dynamics to predict popularity of news. In Proc. Intl. World
Wide Web Conf. (WWW), 621–630.
Leskovec, J.; Adamic, L.; and Huberman, B. 2007. The
dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web 1(1).
Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E., eds. 1985. Handbook of So-
cial Psychology: Group Psychology and the Phenomena of
Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
Ma, Z.; Sun, A.; and Cong, G. 2013. On predicting the
popularity of newly emerging hashtags in twitter. J. Am. Soc.
for Information Science and Technology 64(7):1399–1410.
Mason, W.; Jones, A.; and Goldstone, R. 2008. Propaga-
tion of innovations in networked groups. J. Experimental
Psychology: General 137(3):422.
McNames, J. 1998. A nearest trajectory strategy for time se-
ries prediction. In Proc. Intl. Workshop on Advanced Black-
Box Technique for Nonlinear Modeling, 112–128.
McPherson, M.; Lovin, L.; and Cook, J. 2001. Birds of a
feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol-
ogy 27(1):415–444.
Muchnik, L.; Aral, S.; and Taylor, S. J. 2013. So-
cial influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science
341(6146):647–651.
Newman, M. E. J. 2006. Modularity and community struc-
ture in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103(23):8577–8582.
Onnela, J.; Saram
¨
aki, J.; Hyv
¨
onen, J.; Szab
´
o, G.; Lazer, D.;
Kaski, K.; Kert
´
esz, J.; and Barab
´
asi, A. 2007. Structure and
tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Nat.
Acad. Sci. 104(18):7332–7336.
Pastor-Satorras, R., and Vespignani, A. 2001. Epidemic
spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86:3200–
3203.
Pinto, H.; Almeida, J. M.; and Gonc¸alves, M. A. 2013. Us-
ing early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube
videos. In Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. on Web search and data
mining (WSDM), 365–374.
Romero, D. M.; Galuba, W.; Asur, S.; and Huberman, B. A.
2011. Influence and passivity in social media. In Proc. Intl.
World Wide Web Conf. (Companion Volume), 113–114.
Romero, D. M.; Meeder, B.; and Kleinberg, J. 2011. Differ-
ences in the mechanics of information diffusion across top-
ics: Idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on
twitter. In Proc. Intl. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW).
Romero, D. M.; Tan, C.; and Ugander, J. 2013. On the
interplay between social and topical structure. In Proc. Intl.
AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
Rosvall, M., and Bergstrom, C. T. 2008. Maps of ran-
dom walks on complex networks reveal community struc-
ture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(4):1118–1123.
Salganik, M.; Dodds, P.; and Watts, D. 2006. Experimental
study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cul-
tural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.
Suh, B.; Hong, L.; Pirolli, P.; and Chi, E. H. 2010. Want
to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting
retweet in twitter network. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on So-
cial Computing, 177–184.
Szabo, G., and Huberman, B. A. 2010. Predicting the pop-
ularity of online content. Commun. ACM 53(8):80–88.
Tang, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, C.; and Yang, Z. 2009. Social in-
fluence analysis in large-scale networks. In Proc. ACM Intl.
Conf. on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD).
Tsur, O., and Rappoport, A. 2012. What’s in a hashtag?:
content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblog-
ging communities. In Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. on Web search
and data mining (WSDM), 643–652.
Vespignani, A. 2009. Predicting the behavior of techno-
social systems. Science 325(5939):425–428.
Watts, D. J. 2002. A simple model of global cascades on
random networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(9):5766–5771.
Weng, J.; Lim, E.-P.; Jiang, J.; and He, Q. 2010. Twitterrank:
finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In Proc. ACM
Intl. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM).
Weng, L.; Flammini, A.; Vespignani, A.; and Menczer, F.
2012. Competition among memes in a world with limited
attention. Scientific Reports 2(335).
Weng, L.; Ratkiewicz, J.; Perra, N.; Gonc¸alves, B.; Castillo,
C.; Bonchi, F.; Schifanella, R.; Menczer, F.; and Flammini,
A. 2013. The role of information diffusion in the evolution
of social networks. In Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. on Knowledge
discovery and data mining (KDD), 356–364.
Weng, L.; Menczer, F.; and Ahn, Y.-Y. 2013. Virality predic-
tion and community structure in social networks. Scientific
Reports 3(2522).
Wu, F., and Huberman, B. A. 2007. Novelty and collective
attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(45):17599–17601.
Yang, J., and Leskovec, J. 2011. Patterns of temporal vari-
ation in online media. In Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. on Web
Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 177–186.
Yang, L.; Sun, T.; and Mei, Q. 2012. We Know What @You
#Tag: Does the Dual Role Affect Hashtag Adoption? In
Proc. Intl. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW), 261–270.