works. Publishers, however, routinely grant students the right to reproduce such works as
part of a thesis. Typically, as a condition of this permission, publishers require that the
text not be altered. A student who wishes to include a publication in a thesis should
contact the publisher directly. The bulk of a dissertation could be such a publication or
publications, with a separate introduction, discussion, and conclusion added.
J. ADMISSION TO CANDIDACY
Candidacy Examinations
The student must pass a candidacy examination consisting of written and oral portions
and administered by the doctoral committee. This examination will include a
comprehensive coverage of the student’s academic background to enable the committee
to evaluate the student’s potential for successful completion of the Ph.D. degree program.
This examination will be taken at a time designated by the doctoral committee, but no
sooner than the completion of the first 27 graduate-level semester hours and no later than
the completion of the first 60 graduate credit hours, to be applied to the Ph.D. program.
For a student to pass their candidacy examination, a majority of the doctoral committee
must vote in the affirmative on both the written and oral portions. A student who fails this
examination may, with the permission of the committee, repeat it once; the repeated
examination will be at a time designated by the committee, but no sooner than the lapse
of one semester and no later than eight months before granting of the degree.
According to the above requirements, the candidacy examination is normally taken some
time between the end of the second year and the end of the third year in the program. The
exact timing is up to the student’s advisory committee but in general, the student should
have completed all formal course work and should have made significant preliminary
progress on their dissertation research. It is anticipated that after a student passes the
candidacy examination, they will direct all of their academic effort to their dissertation
research.
The written portion follows a “proposal-based” format. The primary goal is to evaluate
the ability of the student to identify an interesting and significant biological problem, to
formulate hypotheses or models that investigate or explain the problem and to design
experiments that rigorously test the hypothesis or model. A further goal is to enable the
student to attain skills and experience in preparing funding proposals to be submitted to
federal, state or private funding agencies.
As a first step, the student will prepare a one-page abstract of the proposal, to be
submitted to and approved by the advisory committee, prior to preparation of the full-
length proposal. This abstract should contain:
• a brief, descriptive title of the proposal or problem,
• a concise summary of key evidence/experimental findings underlying the
hypothesis,
• a short, focused statement of the hypothesis or model to be tested and
• a general and very brief listing of the different approaches that might be
taken to test the hypothesis or model.