To the Seventh Generation:
Inheritance and Legacy
HONORS PROGRAM GUIDE
January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2021
HONORS IN ACTION
HONORS IN ACTION
Honoring Scholars, Building Leaders
PHI THETA KAPPA HONOR SOCIETY
Center for Excellence
1625 Eastover Drive
Jackson, MS 39211
ptk.org
601.984.3504
© 2020, 2021 by Phi Theta Kappa, Inc., in the United States and Canada. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced without the consent of Phi Theta Kappa.
The name, logo, and various titles herein have been registered with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Ofce. The Phi Theta Kappa Honors Program Guide is published once every
two years by Phi Theta Kappa, 1625 Eastover Drive, Jackson, MS 39211, 601.984.3504.
ABOUT PHI THETA KAPPA
Phi Theta Kappa is the premier honor society recognizing the academic achievement
of college students and helping them to grow as scholars and leaders. The Society is
made up of more than 3.5 million members and nearly 1,300 chapters in 11 nations.
PUBLISHER
Phi Theta Kappa, Inc.
EDITORIAL AND DESIGN
President and CEO
Dr. Lynn Tincher-Ladner
Vice President of Student Engagement
Dr. Blake Ellis
Associate Vice President, Honors Programming and
Undergraduate Research
Susan Edwards
Associate Vice President, Program Implementation
Jennifer Stanford
Curriculum Designer
Ragan Chastain
Intern
Miracle Hunter
Associate Vice President, Marketing and Communications
Katherine Scanlon
Copywriter/Content Analyst
Tracee Walker
Multimedia Designer
Blair White
Project Manager
Tracy Kleven
TOPIC, THEME, AND CONTENT DEVELOPMENT
Honors Program Council
Chair
Associate Vice President, Honors Programming and
Undergraduate Research-Phi Theta Kappa
Susan Edwards
Humanities Representative
Dr. Rosie L. Banks
Honors Consultant
Dr. Joan Gallagher Fedor
Leadership Development Representative
Prof. Steven J. Fritts
Technical/Workforce Representative
Dr. Patricia D. Hall
STEM Representative
Prof. Rahul Kane
Social Sciences/Communication Representative
Prof. Cassandra Powell
Service Learning Representative
Prof. Lara A. Roemer
Humanities Representative
Dr. Terri Smith Ruckel
STEM Representative
Dr. Mitch Stimers
Associate Vice President of STEM and
Workforce Programs-Phi Theta Kappa
Dr. Johannah B. Williams
Honors Program Guide 1
Contents
Phi Theta Kappa Honors in Action ........................................................................ 2
How to Use This Program Guide ........................................................................... 3
Honors in Action At-A-Glance ............................................................................... 4
To the Seventh Generation: Inheritance and Legacy ..........................................5
Theme 1: The Heirs of our Ways ...........................................................................8
Theme 2: Natural and Constructed Environments ..............................................10
Theme 3: Trade, Craftsmanship, and Industry .....................................................12
Theme 4: Expressions of Truth ..............................................................................14
Theme 5: Resistance – Reform, Rebellion, Revolution ........................................16
Theme 6: Perceptions of Progress ........................................................................18
Theme 7: Life and Death ........................................................................................20
Honors in Action Planning Rubric .........................................................................22
Identifying and Analyzing Academic Sources ......................................................25
Developing a Research Question..........................................................................29
Honors in Action Journal .......................................................................................30
Sample Honors in Action Project ..........................................................................32
Phi Theta Kappa Honors Program Council ..........................................................36
Phi Theta Kappa Honors Study Topics ..................................................................37
2 Honors Program Guide
OUR HONORS PROGRAM: HONORS IN ACTION
Phi Theta Kappa features a remarkable program called Honors in Action, designed to engage students in informed
action meant to foster student success and help the organization fulll its mission of providing college students
opportunities to grow as scholars and leaders.
By engaging in the academic research process from the beginning, developing a research question, compiling the
research, and presenting it to a wider audience via the Hallmark Award entry process, students gain valuable research
and service learning experience. The students’ engagement does not stop at academic research, as they will take
the lessons learned from the research and analysis process and create an action-oriented project to provide tangible
support within the issue area in their community.
Through these experiences, students will build both practical and academic skills. By working closely with their peers
as well as campus and community leaders, students will learn not only how to research an issue, but how to utilize
resources and build professional relationships.
HONORS IN ACTION LEARNING OUTCOMES
Participation in Honors in Action contributes to personal, academic, and career development. It affords students
opportunities to have an impact on their campuses and in their communities by addressing challenges related to
their Honors Study Topic research. Members who participate in the development and implementation of an Honors in
Action project will be able to:
1. Create awareness of the importance of seeking out multiple perspectives to augment understanding of a real-world,
complex, interdisciplinary topic and improve decision making,
2. Demonstrate analytical and critical thinking skills to draw research conclusions,
3. Initiate real-world problem-solving by developing an in-depth, action-oriented solution to make a difference for a
challenge related to their Honors Study Topic research,
4. Plan and set goals for each step of the Honors in Action process,
5. Develop capacities to lead, manage, and motivate self and others, to perform in complicated environments and
accomplish goals,
6. Collaborate and create effective teams to enhance project impact, and
7. Cultivate reective skills and aptitudes to assess progress, adjust to circumstances, and measure results
quantitatively and qualitatively.
Achievement of these learning outcomes builds the analytic and collaborative problem-solving and leadership skills
necessary and valued in advanced academic pursuits, workplaces, and communities.
Phi Theta Kappa Honors in Action
Honors Program Guide 3
HONORS IN ACTION
EXPLORE THE GUIDE TO GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE 2020/2021 HONORS STUDY TOPIC
AND ITS THEMES (PAGES 5-21)
• Read the Honors Study Topic essay for an overview of the 2020/2021 topic.
• Check out the seven Honors Study Topic Themes for more detail about each theme.
Read the overarching question located below the theme title to help guide your selection of an Honors Study Topic
Theme.
• Read the introduction to the theme.
• Check out the sources in the “Discover More” Section.
READ AND ANALYZE THE HONORS IN ACTION PLANNING RUBRIC (PAGES 22-23)
Look at the detail for each section of the rubric: Academic Investigation, Action (with collaboration), and Impact.
The rubric will guide your HIA team to set research, action, and collaboration objectives. Be sure all elements of a
strong HIA project are included in your planning and implementation.
Remember, this is the same rubric that Hallmark Award judges use to score award entries when they are submitted.
EXAMINE HOW TO IDENTIFY AND ANALYZE ACADEMIC SOURCES (PAGES 24-26)
Investigating academic sources related to the Honors Study Topic is the cornerstone of Honors in Action. Learn
how to determine whether a source is academically credible.
DISCOVER HOW TO DEVELOP A RESEARCH QUESTION (PAGE 27)
Once you select one of the seven Honors Study Topic Themes, your HIA team will develop a research question.
Learn the steps to take to ensure that you have a robust question guiding your research.
LEARN HOW TO CREATE YOUR TEAM’S HIA JOURNAL (PAGES 27-28)
Not sure how to create an effective HIA Journal? Explore the suggestions, including questions to ask yourselves,
about how to create your team’s journal.
CHECK OUT THE SAMPLE HIA PROJECT (PAGES 29-31)
Members of the Honors Program Council have provided a sample HIA project based on the 2020/2021 Honors
Study Topic.
How to Use This Honors Program Guide
4 Honors Program Guide
INVESTIGATE AND ANALYZE
Review the Honors Program Guide and
develop research objectives to guide
your in-depth academic research into
a specic theme related to the current
Honors Study Topic.
STRATEGIZE AND LEAD
Consider how your research
ndings manifest locally, identify a
real-world problem related to your
academic research that requires
action, and brainstorm possible
solutions to the problem.
Identify collaborators
on campus and in
the community and
execute the plan of
action.
Execute your
plan of action.
ASSESS AND REFLECT
Reect on and evaluate your
academic research, action,
and project collaboration.
Assess teamwork and
how members grew as
scholars and leaders
throughout the Honors
in Action process.
Write, edit, and submit
your team’s Honors in
Action Hallmark Award
entry.
Develop a plan of action to
address the local problem
identied by Honors Study
Topic research ndings.
Develop a research
question to guide
your Honors Study
Topic investigation.
Investigate academic
sources with varied
viewpoints related to
your research question.
Reect on and analyze
your research to develop
research conclusions.
Honors in Action projects require substantive academic
investigation of a theme related to the Society’s current
Honors Study Topic. The theme you select should be
directly connected to and provide supporting evidence
for the development of the action component of your
project. Honors in Action projects require you to address
a need in your community that was discovered through
your research and analysis into the Society’s current
Honors Study Topic.
HONORS IN ACTION
Set action and
collaboration
objectives.
Set research
objectives.
START HERE
Honors Program Guide 5
To the Seventh Generation: Inheritance
and Legacy
By Susan Edwards
Associate Vice President, Honors Programming and Undergraduate Research, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
There’s a history through her
Sent to us as a gift from the future
To show us the proof
More than that, it’s to dare us to move
And to open our eyes and to learn from the sky…
And live like we’re still alive
~ Sara Bareilles
What did we inherit from our ancestors, and what legacy
can we leave for future generations? Sara Bareilles, in her
2013 song “Chasing the Sun,” pondered life on a grand
scale. Bareilles sang, “It’s a really old city, stuck between
the dead and the living, so I thought to myself sitting on
a graveyard shelf, as the echo of heartbeats, from the
ground below my feet, lled a cemetery in the center
of Queens.” She contemplated the names and dates of
people buried there and concluded from the symphony
of their heartbeats that life is meant to be meaningful. We
can try our best. We can chase the sun. Our hopes, dreams,
fears, and challenges are meaningful when placed in the
context of our ancestors and descendants to the seventh
generation and beyond. Like Bareilles, Amelia Earhart
argued that we should chase our dreams. “The most
difcult thing,” Earhart said, “is the decision to act. The
rest is merely tenacity.”
Ojibwe culture is credited with the concept of thinking
about decisions with the seventh generation in mind. The
Ojibwe are part of the Haudenosaunee who believe they
are connected to the rst people who walked on Earth and
to those people who are yet to be born. According to Rick
Hill, Sr., Tuscarora of the Beaver clan and former Special
Assistant to the Director of the Smithsonian’s Museum of
the American Indian, people living today are the bridge
between ancestors and descendants. To Hill, “We inherit
a duty, we inherit a responsibility…Don’t just come here
expecting to benet. You come here to work hard so
that the future can enjoy that benet.” To Oren Lyons,
Onondaga Faithkeeper of the Turtle Clan of the Seneca
Nations, it is vital to think about people beyond your
generation so that they can enjoy the culture, way of life,
and preservation of the land your generation inherited.
In a 2006 interview with the Public Broadcasting System’s
Christine Turner, Bill Moyers discussed his play, The Seven,
an adaptation of Aeschylus’ tragedy, Seven Against Thebes
(476 B.C.E.). Both plays explored the idea that generations
have questioned whether they control their destinies or
whether destiny is out of their control. Moyers argued that
every generation has grappled with what they inherit from
their ancestors and what they will leave behind. He told
Turner that he had come to the conclusion that his legacy
would be love – that he tried to make decisions based on
love, rather than on fear.
Columnist Charles Blow wrote about legacy and children in
a 2019 New York Times piece. We strive, Blow contended,
to teach children “how honor and integrity are constructed,
maintained, and defended. We want to raise good people
and good citizens, people who respect society and follow
the rules, though not blindly. We want them to question
the world, and if they identify injustice, work to eliminate
it.” When the United States Women’s Soccer Team won
the 2019 World Cup, the Nike Corporation released a
television commercial with a powerful message about
legacy. In it, the narrator expressed the hope that, “a whole
generation of girls and boys will go out and play and say
things like, ‘I want to be like Megan Rapinoe when I grow
up,’ and they’ll be inspired to talk and win and stand up
for themselves.” How do we raise children who thrive
and who understand their connection to ancestors and
responsibilities to generations that follow them?
Humans have long been interested in their place in the
universe, but perceptions have uctuated over time as
scientists built on legacies left by scholars who came
before them. Ancient and Medieval peoples sought
ways to explain the cosmos and believed it was ruled
by supernatural beings, the Earth was at, and planets
revolved around the Earth. As scientic astronomy
developed, so did new understandings of the cosmos. Two
comets helped advance what humans understood about
natural and constructed environments. In 1543, Nicolaus
Copernicus determined that the Sun, not Earth, was at
the center of the universe. He believed that the universe
was composed of crystalline spheres, and scientists who
followed Copernicus found his arguments compelling. In
Denmark, Tycho Brahe thought that knowledge of how
the cosmos worked could help predict events on Earth.
As the king’s astrologer, Brahe was given one percent of
Denmark’s budget to create the world’s best observatory.
When in 1577, a great comet passed close to Earth for two
months and was seen around the world, Brahe tracked
its trajectory through the orbit of Venus. Brahe noted
that crystalline spheres should have stopped the comet.
Logically, then, the spheres did not exist.
6 Honors Program Guide
Johannes Keppler, a German scientist who worked
in Prague and who also witnessed the 1577 comet,
argued that religious and ancient ideas about the
cosmos should be discarded. Empirical observation, he
believed, should be the basis for understanding science.
Keppler recalculated Brahe’s precise calculations to
determine that planets moved in ellipses, rather than
circles. Working in 17th-Century England, Isaac Newton
added that studying the universe in a holistic way would
help science reveal God’s master plan. Another comet,
this one in 1680, would be seen during the day and
reappeared in 1681. Newton concluded that gravity
surrounding the Sun had caused the comet to travel in an
elliptical motion and that gravity was the glue that held
the universe together. The work done by Copernicus,
Brahe, Keppler, and Newton laid groundwork for siblings
Caroline Herschel and William Herschel to build powerful
telescopes in the 18th Century, Albert Einstein’s Theory
of Relativity, Georges Lemaître’s recalculation of Einstein’s
theory to show the universe was expanding, and Edwin
Hubble’s 100-inch telescope. Their work has, in turn, led
to the development of the Extremely Large Telescope
(ELT). The ELT is under construction in Chile’s Atacama
Desert and will allow 13 times more light than older
telescopes (100 million times more light than human eyes
can naturally see).
Dr. Alexandra Amon, astrophysicist and observational
cosmologist at Stanford University, has said that we know
only ve percent of the observable universe. Continuing
to measure what is going on in the universe is the only
way to understand the cosmos and how it relates to the
human experience. The legacies of these scientists and
artisans will inspire 21st-Century explorers and innovators
as they examine more than 100 billion galaxies currently
known to exist.
Singers, songwriters, and business people have explored
the building blocks of human experience through country
music stories. The country music industry annually pulls
in more than two billion dollars and accounts for nearly
35 percent of the recorded music industry’s revenue
in the United States. Its popularity is global. There are
Hank Williams cover bands in Spain, saddle-topped
barstools in the Czech Republic, and line dancing halls in
Argentina. In Iran, the Dream Rovers, Shahryar Masrour,
and Thunder are melding American country music with
traditional Iranian tunes. Filmmaker Ken Burns studied
the history of country music for his 2019 documentary
series and found that the industry had created a unique
relationship with fans. The Carters, considered the rst
family of country music whose legacy is considered
the foundation for the rest of country music’s artists,
initially stayed in fans’ homes to save money when they
toured. Stars like Dolly Parton, Charley Pride, Garth
Brooks, Keith Urban, and Blake Shelton, who followed
the Carters, regularly participated in fanfests, spending
hours signing autographs and posing for photographs
that helped them connect with the people who listened
to and purchased their music. Ernest Tubb, another of
the pioneers of country music, known as the “Texas
Troubadour,” explained, “We built this industry one
handshake at a time.”
Burns found that country had its roots in many music
traditions, blues, jazz, hillbilly, as well as the United States
immigrant experience. Singer-songwriter Rhiannon
Giddens’ inuences included strong women like Reba
McEntire, Mary Chapin Carpenter, and Kathy Mattea
who continued the legacy of strong female stars set
by Sara and Maybelle Carter. Giddens appreciated
that, “Jazz emphasizes this, blues emphasizes this,
country emphasizes this, but they are all part of the
American music pot. It’s America, but it’s got Africa in
it.” Songwriter Harlan Howard, who wrote more than
4,000 songs and who was called “the Dean of Nashville
songwriters” by Rolling Stone, explained in song the
appeal of country music. It is “Three Chords and the
Truth.”
Thirteenth-Century theologian Thomas Aquinas
synthesized the philosophy of Aristotle with the teachings
of the Roman Catholic Church and saw reason and
revelation as complementary means of knowing truth.
Aquinas realized the value in listening to expressions of
truth articulated by all people. He believed, “We must
love them both, those whose opinions we share and
those whose opinions we reject, for both have labored in
the search for truth, and both have helped in nding it.”
To what extent is honoring others’ opinions still desirable
and possible in a seemingly polarized, post-truth world?
What legacies do we build when we search for and
express truth?
Harriet Tubman had a vision for her life based on the truth
that, as journalist Sheryl WuDunn has argued, the greatest
injustice of the 19th Century was slavery. Tubman said, “Every
great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you
have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to
reach for the stars to change the world.” Tubman’s truth was
expressed through her active resistance to the institution of
slavery. James Baldwin who wrote about the legacy of slavery
and the human condition, expressed his truth, “It took many
years of vomiting up all the lth I had been taught about
myself, and half-way believed, before I was able to walk on the
earth as though I had a right to be here.” He left a legacy of
resistance, great literature, and inspiring words for people like
Billy Porter, who paraphrased Baldwin in his acceptance speech
when, in 2019, Porter became the rst openly gay man to win
an Emmy Award for Best Actor in a Drama Series.
Duchess Harris, alumna of the Mellon Mays Undergraduate
Fellowship Program and Professor and Chair of the American
Studies Department at Macalester College, wanted people to
think about inheritance and legacy. Her interest in inheritance
and legacy was the impetus to explore her grandmother’s
history as one of NASAs earliest female mathematicians.
Miriam Mann worked on the Friendship 7 project, and Harris
created her “Human Computers at NASA” digital archives
project to highlight the work and heritage of women like Mann.
Along with the global legacy of slavery, WuDunn argues that
the greatest injustice for the 21st Century is global gender
inequality. She has argued that in the West, there are more
women than men because women have
access to food and health care.
As a result, they live longer
than did their ancestors.
Demographers have
determined, though,
that there are
between 60
million and
100 million
missing females in the rest of the global population. WuDunn
explained that there are several reasons for having fewer
women worldwide. Over the past 50 years, more girls were
“discriminated to death” than all people killed in 20th-Century
wars. Advancements in sonograms have meant rises in the
number of abortions of female fetuses in resource-scarce
areas of the world. And, after the rst year of life when most
children worldwide breastfeed, girls are fed less food and more
often than boys die of starvation. Education and economic
opportunity for females, WuDunn argued, is key to ghting
overpopulation and pervasive poverty and leaving a legacy for
future generations.
In Amor Towles’ A Gentleman in Moscow (2016), the character
Richard Vanderwhile mused, “I guess the point I’m trying
to make is that as a species we’re just no good at writing
obituaries. We don’t know how a man or his achievements
will be perceived three generations from now, any more than
we know what his great-great-grandchildren will be having
for breakfast on a Thursday in March. Because when Fate
hands something down to posterity, it does so behind its
back.” While we may not know how our achievements will
be perceived generations from now, we can, to quote Sara
Bareilles, “chase the sun” and do our best to learn from the
past, to make life meaningful, to take responsibility for our
actions, to be tenacious in our efforts, and to leave the best
possible legacy to the seventh generation. Aandi ezhaayan?
(Where are you going?)
Honors Program Guide 7
8 Honors Program Guide
The Heirs of Our Ways
How do we acknowledge our inheritance and support children in ways that promote
humanity’s greatest potential?
By Dr. Patricia D. Hall
Honors Program Council, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
The United Nations Educational, Science, and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO) in The Convention on the Rights
of the Child (1995) proposed a world in which “each child
... should grow up in a family environment, an atmosphere
of happiness, love and understanding,” and they “should
be fully prepared to live an individual life in society ...
brought up in the spirit of peace, dignity, tolerance,
freedom, equality, and solidarity.” UNESCO’s proposed
world contrasts with that of detained migrant children on
the United States-Mexico border, sex workers in India,
child waste pickers worldwide, and children with lead-
based brain damage in Flint, Michigan.
Current science corroborates the UNESCO vision: children
thrive in loving, long-term, reciprocal relationships with
family, caregivers, teachers, and peers. At birth, the
human brain is 25 percent of its adult size, and it grows to
85 percent by age three. The corpus callosum achieves
its maturity in a person’s mid-twenties. For children to
grow optimally, they need access to challenging and
safe experiences in stable communities as well as access
to education, healthy food, air, and water. If all goes
well, children become self-motivated, happy, productive
members of their communities.
Clarkson, Morrisette and Régallet (1992) note that
traditional indigenous cultures view the rights of the child
differently from prevailing western cultures. Their beliefs
emphasize that the survival of the group is tantamount,
and that everyone has a unique contribution to make
to society. While indigenous cultures recognize children
have unique needs for protection and support, children
are incorporated into collective work as their skills and
abilities grow. By contrast, western cultures emphasize the
satisfaction of material wants, and that stress on material
wants may have led to increasingly consumer-oriented
societies. In the West, nuclear families are the norm, and
day-to-day life includes measures of competition for
scarce resources among and within family units. With the
mechanisms of the state and the market geared toward
production and accumulation, according to Clarkson,
Morrisette, and Régallet, the fulllment of individual
needs is the measure of success. As the global population
adopts this western denition of success, a variety of
implications for childhood have emerged.
Census data from The Opportunity Atlas shows that where
children are born makes a difference in their lives. Zip
codes establish a geofence that identies socioeconomic
status and creates a predictor of major life outcomes.
Projected lifespan, income, incarceration rate, and college
graduation can all be affected. Infant mortality for non-
Hispanic Blacks in the United States, for example, is on
par with conict zones in Syria and the West Bank. For a
variety of reasons, child and adolescent mental illness,
along with suicide rates, is increasing. With urbanization
and regional mobility, infants and children experience
institutional care outside the home in a consumer-funded
system that emphasizes access over quality.
The capacity for us to improve major life outcomes for
children is strong. Industrialized countries, including
Sweden and New Zealand, have invested in community-
supported early education and family programs. Genetic
modication promises the potential to eliminate common
childhood diseases. Technology in education allows
individualization that supports creativity and innovation.
Teens, like Swedish environmental activist Greta
Thunberg, and Parkland High School gun control activist
David Hogg, have high levels of resilience and continue
to thrive in the face of adversity. “Dreamers” show the grit
necessary to navigate the immigration system that also
serves them well in education systems and workplaces.
From ancestors we have inherited wisdom and problems
to solve before they are passed to our children and future
generations. We can learn by listening to lessons shared
by experts in neuroscience, child development, cultural
anthropology, technology, and trauma-informed family
support systems to create healthy communities in which
children thrive. What legacy will we leave children? How
can we ensure our legacy creates opportunities for
all our children to ourish in ways that allow them to
leave a brilliant legacy for the seventh generation?
THEME 1
Honors Program Guide 9
Discover More
Aldy, J. E. (2016). Mobilizing political action on behalf
of future generations. The future of children, 26(1),
157-178. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/
stable/43755235
Aldy analyzed current efforts to ght climate change
at a national and global level, and how our failure to
mobilize sufcient effort will affect future generations.
He suggested linking climate change with other issues
that affect children to potentially diminish political
opposition.
Copeland, W. E., Shanahan, L., Hinesley, J., Chan, R.
F., Alberg, K. A., Fairbank, J. A., van den Oord,
E. J. C. G.& Costello, E. J. (2018, November
9). Association of childhood trauma exposure
with adult psychiatric disorders and functional
outcomes. JAMA Network Open (7), 1-11.
Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/
jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2713038
Copeland and his colleagues shared highlights of their
longitudinal study about the lifelong consequences of
childhood trauma.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around
the world: What can we learn from international
practice? European Journal of Teacher Education,
40(3), 291-309. Retrieved from https://www.
researchgate.net/publication/285681149_Teacher_
education_around_the_world_What_can_we_
learn_from_international_practice
Darling-Hammond surveyed varied global
education movements to nd practices that can
be used to best educate children to thrive in
the world.
Gopnik, A. (2009). The philosophical baby: What
children’s minds tell us about truth, love, and the
meaning of life. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and
Giroux.
Gopnik explained the cutting-edge scientic and
psychological, neuroscientic, and philosophical
research that has revealed that babies learn more,
create more, care more, and experience more than
we could ever have imagined.
Lally, R. (2013). For our babies: Ending the invisible
neglect of America’s infants. New York, NY:
Teacher’s College Press, Columbia University.
Lally examined the needs of babies and their families
and the effects of U.S. policies on children’s brains,
behavior, and learning capacities.
10 Honors Program Guide
Natural and Constructed Environments
To what extent are natural and constructed environments uctuating, and how can we
intentionally interact with them to affect our legacy?
By Dr. Mitch Stimers
Honors Program Council, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
A natural environment, constructed without human
assistance, has always surrounded us. Only in recent
history have we signicantly modied this global
space through technological advancements, altering
one environment to create the other. Now, whether in
symphony or cacophony, both natural and modied
environments are entangled with the whole of life.
Fluctuations in systems are not the exception but the
rule. The second law of thermodynamics, for example,
describes how the propensity of a physical system to
break down is inevitable. Change, then, is inevitable.
This law, when read as a general narrative on change
rather than as a specic description of the proclivities of
heat and energy, informs us that no system is immune
to perturbations. Yet, it is future generations who will
realize the legacy of today’s exchanges with natural and
constructed environments, just as we have inherited the
consequences of past decisions and actions.
Conversion of natural landscapes into dense and
impermeable urban complexes, and the ever-expanding
need to convert forests and grasslands to productive
agricultural elds, continues to amend life and its agencies
and operations across the lithosphere, hydrosphere,
and atmosphere. The loss of arable land to erosion
and pollution poses a looming threat to the ability to
produce food. Simultaneously, food waste, caused by
consumption and distribution issues, is also a concern.
There is, as well, increased magnitude, frequency, and
intensity of some slow- and rapid-onset natural disaster
types. Destructive interaction between the natural and
human-constructed harbors the potential to affect millions
more people annually than people and animals historically
have experienced. Climate and environmental change
is altering the world, our perceptions of it, our place in
it, and perhaps geologic time itself – welcome to the
Anthropocene.
Articial intelligence (AI) is radically and rapidly altering
how even one generation ahead of us will interact with
machines and global digital networks. In 2017, Google’s
AlphaZero AI was trained in chess for nine hours, having
been programmed with only the rules of the game. All
strategy was learned by the AI. AlphaZero went on to
outperform the Stocksh 8 chess program, the best non-AI
chess engine in the world at the time. In a span of time
roughly matching a standard workday, a machine learned
and mastered one of our most complex games.
According to historian and futurist Yuval Harari, the
potential death of liberalism; a range of philosophical
visions about liberty, consent of the governed, and social
justice that Harari sees as the last “human story,” might
leave our political and social systems in a state of disarray.
If that happens, we will require an entirely new story to
help us understand our world. Recent movements of
nationalism by some of the largest and most economically
important countries are challenging the ways in which
citizens, both internally and externally, will interact with
others, as well as the natural environment, for decades.
Our alterations of natural environments and the expansion
of built environments stemming from actions just two
or three generations past are now coming into view.
Systems we have built to support life, society, and
economies are shifting daily. Eminent scientist James
Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesis portends that we are
part of one global organism, and understanding
both natural and constructed environments,
and our relationship to them, is vital should
we wish to continue this story to the
seventh generation.
THEME 2
Honors Program Guide 11
Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired
by nature. New York, NY: William Morris.
Benyus investigated what she considered nature’s best
ideas, such as spider silk and prairie grass, to determine
how humans can be inspired to adapt and innovate in
ways that support their survival.
Diamond, J. (2011). Collapse: How societies choose to
fail or succeed: (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin
Group.
Diamond explored the downfall of some of the world’s
great civilizations, the characteristics of their natural
and constructed environments, and the choices they
made that led to their downfalls and legacies for future
generations.
Goodell, J. (2017). The water will come: Rising seas,
sinking cities, and the remaking of the civilized
world. New York, NY: Little Brown.
Goodell combined anecdotes with expert analysis
from around the globe to consider the effects of
environmental change on natural and constructed
environments today and for future generations.
Lovelock, J. (2016). A rough ride to the future. New
York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
Lovelock explored the idea that climate change
may not be caused by greedy and destructive
humans but, instead, it is the result of the
constructive chaos of changing constructed
environments.
Quinn, D. (1995). Ishmael: A Novel. New York, NY:
Bantam.
Quinn constructed a ctional world in which the gorilla
Ishmael teaches the narrator of the novel about humans’
place in the world.
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M.,
Alamgir, M., Crist, E., Mahmoud, M. I., & Laurance,
W. F. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity:
A second notice. BioScience, 67(12), 1026–1028.
Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/
bioscience/article/67/12/1026/4605229
The authors updated the warning to humanity
written more than 25 years ago by the Union of
Concerned Scientists and signed onto by more than
1,700 independent scientists, including many Nobel
Laureates. They argued we have a responsibility to serve
as stewards of the Earth for future generations.
Discover More
12 Honors Program Guide
Trade, Crasmanship, and Industry
How have inherited practices of trade, craftsmanship, and industry shaped our world,
and what legacies will we inspire?
By Prof. Steven J. Fritts
Honors Program Council, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
Our world is a global marketplace where goods and
services are bartered, bought, sold, and traded.
Exchanges occur between friends and strangers, in souks
and contemporary open-air malls, across borders, and
on global computer networks. What vestiges of trade,
crafts, and industry remain that our ancestors would
recognize? To what extent has quality craftsmanship
remained a constant from one generation to the next?
As society progresses and needs grow, how do artisans
and craftspeople respond? To what degree is industry
connected to and still primarily driven by craftsmanship?
To what extent has efciency become the goal of the
contemporary world? How can craftsmanship and
efciency work in tandem to produce quality products and
a thriving global economy? Answers to these questions
help us consider practices we have inherited and how
they have shaped our world, as well as the legacies we will
leave to future generations.
Since they lacked many natural resources, Ancient
civilizations used the Tigris, Euphrates, Nile, Indus, and
Yellow Rivers to practice bartering and develop trade
routes to gain items they needed to sustain their society.
After 1,000 B.C.E., Mesopotamians used camels to trade
over land. From the 1st Century B.C.E. to the 13th Century,
the Silk Road connected China to the Roman Empire.
That connection helped spread knowledge, technology,
religion, the arts, and, unfortunately, the Black Death
throughout the world. Pathways such as the Spice Route
and the Via Salaria also helped global culture and trade
spread. Today, digitally-monitored land and sea routes
produce data to improve the efciency and speed with
which nations and companies can trade with one another.
Data itself, along with stocks, bonds, cryptocurrency, even
professional sports draft processes, have become tradable
commodities. The evolution of trade is coupled with a
return to bartering through sites like eBay, Craigslist,
BabysitterExchange, and SwapThing.
Throughout history, artisans’ works of mastery, more
masterpieces of the soul than simply works, reect
centuries of tradition as well as impetus for trade. We
see craftsmanship in the fragrance houses of France
established by Marie Antoinette. When he bought the
House of Lubin, Gilles Thevenin found a vial of and recipe
for the last perfume worn by the French queen before
she faced the guillotine. Marie Antionette’s legacy can be
seen as well in haute couture in the queen’s Marchande
du Mode, Marie-Jeanne “Rose” Bertain, whose vision
of haute couture for her more than 1,500 wealthy clients
created international fashion trends. The skill of Goorin
Brothers milliners, the artistry of meat cutters, and the
mastery of craft brewers have left legacies of beauty
and excellence. Craftsmanship can be found, too, in the
simplicity of a computer program, the complexity of a
cathedral, and the beauty of a bespoke suit. Mastery
of crafts is exhibited as well in the detail of cobblers’
work, the creativity of graphic novels, and the grace of
professional athletes. Craftspeople have left legacies that
have inspired generations. Are the care and artistry with
which they have operated being lost to automation and
a contemporary desire for efciency, low cost, and mass
production? What effects has the rise of industry had on
craftsmanship?
Industry and manufacturing were born of necessity and
ingenuity. Demands for mass-produced, affordable
products grew. Industry rose to meet the needs of
consumers. The rise of power and transportation
industries, for instance, fueled the economy. New trade
routes were developed with the advent of railroads,
aviation, and over-the-road trucking. However, creating
railroad engines, tracks on which trains could run, and
towns along routes led to the loss of 6,600,000 trees by
1890 which, in turn, affected the lives of millions in both
positive and negative ways. Economies ourished and
markets rose and fell. Understanding the legacies of trade,
craftsmanship, and industry allows us to consider their
impact on future generations. Are we experiencing a new
industrial revolution? How will trade through hyperloops,
space travel, and new disciplines of craftsmanship and
industry shape the future and affect our legacies?
THEME 3
Honors Program Guide 13
Lacroix, C., Tétart-Vittu, F., Trubert-Tollu, C., Martin-
Hattemberg, J., & Olivieri, F. (2017). The House of
Worth: 1858 - 1954: The birth of haute couture.
London, England: Thames and Hudson.
The House of Worth is a detailed examination of the
birth and evolution of high fashion from the era of Marie
Antoinette to the mid-20th Century.
Liu, X. & Shaffer, L. N. (2007). Connections across
Eurasia: Transportation, communication, and
cultural exchange on the Silk Roads. New York,
NY: McGraw Hill.
Liu and Shaffer examined the history of the Silk
Roads trading routes and their impact on the lands,
communications, religions, arts, and economies of
people who lived along the routes.
Morris, C. R. (2012). The dawn of innovation: The rst
American Industrial Revolution. New York, NY:
PublicAffairs.
Morris presented a detailed history of the
rst American Industrial Revolution and its
impact on trade, the economy, and living
conditions for people affected by its reach.
McKibben, B. (2006). The age of missing information
(reprint ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
McKibben explored the assumption that, with the vast
amount of information that is bombarding us with the
advent of technology, we are better informed than past
generations.
Discover More
14 Honors Program Guide
Expressions of Truth
In what ways do inherited expressions of truth build lasting legacies?
By Prof. Cassandra Powell and Dr. Terri Ruckel
Honors Program Council, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
Roman mythology locates Veritas (Truth), the daughter
of Chronos (Time), at the bottom of a dark, deep well,
usually clothed in a virginal white gown but now and
then wearing nothing at all. In other words, Truth is
seldom naked, usually out of reach, and always the
daughter of time.
In one of Aesop’s Fables, a man journeying through
the wilderness encounters the goddess of truth and
questions why she lives so far from the cities. She replies,
“Among the people of old, lies were found among only
a few, but now they have spread throughout all of human
society!” Do “the city” and “modernity” send the truth
into exile, so much so that the traveler encounters truth
only by accident?
In a world of “alternative facts,” Orwell’s 1984, and
ever-changing revisionist stories, how do these ancient
tales conrm or confront understandings of present-day
expressions of “truth”? What compelling stories are we
telling? What do they owe to the past, and how will they
leave something of value upon which future generations
could build?
History is replete with expressions of truth we have
inherited. In 213 B.C.E., Emperor Qin Shi Huang ordered
fenshu kengru, the burning of the Confucian scholars’
books, in order to legitimize his mandate to obliterate
the works of people with whom he did not agree. That
behavior sealed his legacy of destruction. Qin was also
said to have scholars buried alive, though new evidence
suggests that charge may be apocryphal. Copernicus
discovered the truth about the solar system but feared
publishing it during his lifetime. In 1521, the Diet of
Worms convened to determine the fate of Martin Luther.
Luther warned that it was unsafe to go against one’s
conscience. His truth led to his condemnation as an
outlaw. Thomas Jefferson based his ideas about self-
evident truths, such as the right to pursue happiness,
from John Locke’s trilogy of rights: life, liberty, and
property. Abigail Adams pressed her husband as he and
fellow Congressmen considered the extension of rights
in the United States to be more generous than their
ancestors had been to women.
At great personal risk, Harriet Ann Jacobs left us her
memoir, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. How have
authors such as Maryse Condé, Alice Walker, and
Toni Morrison been enriched by Jacobs’ legacy? How
have they taken that inheritance and left a legacy for
generations of writers who will follow them?
Not all truths have been expressed in written form.
Protestors in Tiananmen Square and the photographers
who captured their non-violent acts inspired the world.
Neil Armstrong’s “giant leap for mankind” supported
the contemporary truth that innovation and progress can
help humans achieve seemingly impossible tasks. The
activist Banksy expresses his truth through his distinctive
art meant to “snatch away” power from well-equipped
enemies. Banksy’s work has satirized oppression in
Palestine, hypocrisy in politics, and capitalistic greed
in England. The late Tupac Shakur expressed his truth
through song, and his work continues to outsell other
artists in his music genre.
In what ways do constructed “divides” such as rural-
urban, past-present, female-male, gay-straight affect
our loyalties and inuence our perceptions of others’
expressions of truth? How much—and what—do we
owe to those who have gone before us? What do we
owe to the future? How best can we impart lasting
legacies through our own expressions of truth?
THEME 4
Honors Program Guide 15
Adichie, C. N. (2009, Oct.). The danger of a single
story [Video le]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.
com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_
single_story
Adichie dened a “single story” as a single data point
of information that distorts understanding of cultures,
people, or history. She called for people to embrace
multiple perspectives so as to avoid being trapped in
cognitive distortions.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Originally a series of talks, Austin’s seminal work
developed what is now known as speech act theory.
Ayunerak, P., Alstrom, D., Moses, C., James, Sr.,
C., & Rasmus, S. M. (2014). Yup’ik culture and
context in southwest Alaska: Community member
perspectives of tradition, social change, and
prevention. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 54(1-2), 91-99. Retrieved from https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119478/
The authors presented an ethnographic account of
Alaskan Yup’ik communities, illustrating how people
in indigenous communities have reacted to the
transformation of their language ecology in the tide of
global language endangerment.
Baldwin, J. (Ed.). (2018). Navigating post truth and
alternative facts: Religion and science as political
theology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littleeld.
Baldwin edited a series of essays by scholars
whose work investigated how science, religion,
and political theory intersect and inuence
each other.
Brooks, D. (2015). The road to character. New York,
NY: Thorndike Press.
Brooks examined how people across the globe develop
character beyond individual success.
Sheen, N., Smith, H., Kenworthy, E. W., & Buttereld, F.
(2017). The Pentagon Papers: The secret history of
the Vietnam war. New York, NY: Racehorse.
The Pentagon Papers, a report issued by David Ellsberg
in 1971 on the role of the U.S. government in the
Vietnam War, proved that the U.S. government lied to
the public about the nature and scope of the Vietnam
conict. The authors placed the deception within the
tradition of political environments. The Papers are now
declassied and available to the public.
Discover More
16 Honors Program Guide
Resistance – Reform, Rebellion, Revolution
What have we learned from the inherited effects of resistance, and what legacies
can we envision?
By Prof. Rahul Kane
Honors Program Council, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
Reverence to the past is important and so is the regard for
the future. Resistance is an oppositional act. The practice
of resistance is as intersectional as are the powers against
which resistance is mounted. Both in the past and in the
present, the dynamic nature of resistance comes from the
actors, situations, and from the forms resistance takes.
Resistance can be social, political, or economic – and
sometimes all three. It can be violent or non-violent.
Non-violent protest by Mahatma Gandhi, for example, led
to freedom of India from the British. Resistance by Rosa
Parks in Montgomery, Alabama, led to desegregation,
and resistance led by Nelson Mandela ended apartheid.
Gandhi, Parks, and Mandela had examples of effective
resistance from leaders who came before them. Thoreau’s
philosophy inuenced Gandhi, Harriet Tubman inspired
Parks, and Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
motivated Mandela. Gandhi, Parks, and Mandela inspired
activists who came after them. Wael Ghonim helped
jumpstart the 2011 Egyptian revolution using social
media platforms. Cardiothoracic surgeon turned satirical
comedian, Dr. Bassem Youssef, used the power of social
and traditional media to give international exposure to the
same revolution. Sir Isaac Newton is quoted as saying that
If he had seen further than other men, it was “by standing
on the shoulders of giants.” Acts of resistance and
courage by young people such as Swedish climate activist
Greta Thunberg and Pakistani women’s rights in education
activist and Nobel Laureate Malala Yusafzai stand on the
shoulders of Ghonim and Youssef and others who came
before them.
Non-violent direct action has played a major role in global
resistance, and artists have been part of that tradition.
From Bankim Chandra Chatterji’s “Vande Mataram”
(1882) to Gil Scott-Heron’s “The Revolution Will Not Be
Televised,” (1970), songs and poetry have historically
supported and fueled revolution and, in turn, inspired
future generations of artists. Banksy shredded his art
as an act of rebellion against the concept of art as a
commodity. Slogans such as #MeToo and “reclaiming my
time” represent contemporary tools of resistance that can
unite people who otherwise do not know one another or
those who feel disconnected in 21st-Century social media
culture. Social media itself, when used as propaganda, can
impact people connecting with one another in righteous
protest, but it can also be used to convince people to
follow ignoble instincts.
Revolutions have the potential to change the course of
history. While they can be non-violent, revolutions have
often stemmed from or engendered violence. In 1969, the
spontaneous and violent demonstration of the Stonewall
rebellion led to LGBTQ liberation and Pride celebrations
of today. Twenty years after Stonewall, the “tank man”
of Tiananmen square led to the June Fourth incident in
which student protesters took to the streets of Beijing, and
the government, in response, declared martial law.
Scientic revolutions can originate, too, with a
single person or group of people whose ndings are
groundbreaking. The move from Newtonian physics to
quantum physics opened doors to research in energy,
computing, and medicine. Revolutions can have
unintended consequences, because, to paraphrase
economists James D. Gwartney and Richard J. Stroup, all
important decisions are made with insufcient information.
The move from Newtonian physics to quantum physics, for
instance, also led to the atomic bomb. The discovery of
dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT), while hailed as a
revolution in agricultural application and safety, turned out
to be a disaster that has had a devastating environmental
impact. Rachel Carson’s 1962 book Silent Spring warned
about the effects of DDT on the environment and
helped set the stage for the 21st-Century environmental
revolution. Farmers across the globe who are dealing
with environmental changes can learn from the Third
Agricultural Revolution and from Carson’s warnings to
ensure future food security.
THEME 5
Honors Program Guide 17
Berberoglu, B. (Ed.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook
of social movements, revolution, and social
transformation. London, England: Palgrave
McMillan.
This handbook included global case studies to
investigate varied social movements that have led to
revolutions. Authors discussed the origins, existences,
and challenges of revolutionary movements.
Carson, R., Darling, L., Darling, L. (2002). Silent spring
(anniversary ed.). Cambridge, MA: Houghton
Mifin Company.
Carson illustrated the dangers of commonly
used chemicals that were destroying the delicate
environmental balance. She argued that the
indiscriminate use of dangerous household chemicals
can have extensive, long-lasting, damaging impact on
the environment.
Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I., Raya, M. A., & Riva, G. (2018).
The past, present, and future of virtual and
augmented reality research: A network and cluster
analysis of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology,
9, 2086. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232426/
This article explored the global development of the
concept, applications, and costs of articial intelligence,
virtual reality, and augmented reality as well as
technological revolutions in healthcare, entertainment,
defense, and education.
Faris, D. (2014). Dissent and revolution in a digital age:
Social media, blogging and activism in Egypt.
London, England: I.B. Taurus.
Faris documented digital events that led to and
sustained the Arab uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia. He
discussed how older methods of digital activism, such
as blogging, created and sustained a social awareness
that provided the path for a larger social media-based
revolution that ultimately toppled governments in
Tunisia and Egypt.
Discover More
18 Honors Program Guide
Perceptions of Progress
How do inherited understandings of progress guide the future?
By Prof. Lara Roemer
Honors Program Council, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
According to author and management consultant
Margaret J. Wheatley, “Without reection, we go blindly
on our way, creating more unintended consequences, and
failing to achieve anything useful.” Thus, we discover the
paradox of progress: “progress” is dened as forward or
ongoing movement toward a destination. What happens,
however, when that destination is unclear or when the
path deviates from its original route?
The ways in which we understand development can shape
our interaction with the larger world. While many changes
are viewed positively and embraced by large sections of
the global population, developments always create ripple
effects that may be difcult to predict.
Leo Baekeland’s development of a synthetic-based
plastic in 1907 led to the eventual creation of thousands
of new products. When Baekeland and his counterparts
invented their material, they could not have envisioned
the tons of plastic waste that would one day litter the
world’s oceans and beaches. Nor could they have foreseen
the international political ramications that would result
from that waste. Today, the United States and western
European countries face backlash from Asian nations to
whom they export tons of plastic-based trash. As a result,
Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia have all introduced
laws that ban foreign nations from sending trash to their
countries.
Another example of unintended consequences of
scientic progress involved Nobel Laureate Sir Alexander
Fleming. He rst discovered penicillin in 1928 and
published his ndings to the scientic community with
the assumption that its usage would be very limited. It
wasn’t until a team of researchers in England attempted
to nd a more practical use for the drug in 1939 that the
true potential of penicillin was unlocked, sparking the
beginning of a revolution in the treatment of common
illnesses using antibiotic therapies. The developments
that resulted from Fleming’s initial discovery saved
countless lives upon their deployment in World War II
and in subsequent decades. This medical progress was
overwhelmingly positive; yet because of over prescription
and misuse of these inherited developments, antimicrobial
resistant bugs, or superbugs, have been created. Both
Baekeland’s and Fleming’s discoveries demonstrate an
initial positive change that was embraced by the global
community, but each of these instances demonstrate
the need for more progress to remedy the unintended
consequences.
We should also consider as we examine perceptions of
progress across generations that one person’s denition
of progress may differ from another’s. While much of
the world has embraced the rapid and ever-changing
nature of technological development, widely seen as
being positive and progressive, some communities have
resisted. Across the world, groups like the Amish and
the Mennonites have chosen to slowly and selectively
bring technology into their communities. Some groups,
like Congo’s Mbuti tribe, have even chosen to reject all
modern forms of technology.
Based on our shared inheritance of the results of progress,
we can examine the potential legacies we will leave
for future generations through our own perceptions of
progress. When millions of African citizens have access
to cell phones but not clean water or food, what are the
actual effects of progress?
If you could see the long-term effects of projects
on which you work, and some of those effects
were negative, would you continue your work?
THEME 6
Honors Program Guide 19
Chua, A. (2004). World on re: How exporting free
market democracy spreads ethnic hatred and
global instability. New York, NY: Anchor.
Chua examined the consensus that free markets and
democracy would transform the developing world and
found, instead, that they fueled ethnic violence.
Coccia, M. & Bellitto, M. (2018). Human progress
and its socioeconomic effects in society.
Journal of Economic and Social Thought 5(2),
160-178. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/
abstract=3219147
Coccia and Bellitto provided a lens through which
to quantify human progress and then examined the
positive and negative effects of that progress on society.
They then used metrics to provide critical commentary
on the direction of society.
Juma, C. (2016). Innovation and its enemies: Why
people resist new technologies. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Juma examined historical instances in which different
groups chose to resist the adaptation of new
technologies, seeking to explain both the positive and
negative consequences of doing so.
Kennedy, P. (2011). Preparing for the Twenty-First
Century, (reprint ed.) New York, NY: Vintage.
Kennedy’s seminal book investigated the rise and fall
of powerful nations as the dawn of the 21st Century
approached. He studied wide-ranging elds including
demographics, robotics, economics, population growth,
and the rise of China as a potential superpower to paint
a vivid picture of perceptions of progress.
National Intelligence Council (2017). Global trends: The
paradox of progress. Retrieved from https://www.
dni.gov/les/documents/nic/GT-Full-Report.pdf
The focus of this publication from the National
Intelligence Council analyzed the potential impacts of
progress on the world as it moves forward. It provided
commentary on the likelihood of conict between
nations and possible ways in which the conict can be
avoided.
Discover More
20 Honors Program Guide
Life and Death
How do narratives of life and death inspire commitment to preserving inheritances
and building legacies?
By Dr. Rosie L. Banks and Dr. Johannah B. Williams
Honors Program Council and Associate Vice President of STEM and Workforce Programs, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
Life and death — and the stories we tell about them —
frame the realities in which we exist and encode what we
believe are our inheritances and legacies. The Apocalypse
is an explicitly Western story of our collective end that
emerges out of Christianity. Other cultures and spiritual
traditions have stories of life and death that do not
include that. The story of the Apocalypse, itself a cultural
inheritance, reects popular perceptions of the legacies
of major cultural events. The story’s ever-shifting details —
How? When? Why? Is anything left? So what? — expose
Western hopes, fears, and values. The apocalyptic stories
of the Cold War and the Vietnam conict undergird Baby
Boomer yearning and grief in Joni Mitchell’s 1970 “Big
Yellow Taxi” and John Lennon’s 1971 “Imagine.” Television
and consumeristic nihilism inspire the classic Generation
X responses in REM’s 1983, “It’s the End of the World as
We Know It” and Prince’s “1999.” Prince’s drummer Bobby
Z recalled that Prince wrote his iconic party song in 1993
after watching an HBO documentary on Nostradamus’
prophecies. The classic Millennial expression, YOLO!
(2004), speaks for itself. How do cultural events impact a
community’s legacy or reect its inheritance?
How a culture commemorates or mourns its dead tells
the culture’s story of life and relationships. If Victorians
made keepsakes of their deceased’s hair, today’s mourners
make mixtapes or frame the deceased’s tattoos. Today’s
mourners might even commit to practices that endanger
their own health: in Tanzania, researchers learned that
sleeping under bednets during funerals is discouraged
even though to not use the nets puts mourners in danger
of contracting malaria. What other cultural or communal
practices reveal community identity?
The legacies we leave behind also tell stories of our hopes
and fears. On July 21, 2019, 23-year-old Chardaye Walker’s
sudden death left a legacy of life for eight people. As
an organ donor, Walker’s gift beneted eight families in
unique parts of the world. More than half of adults in the
United States are registered organ donors, and many
others donate their bodies to medical research. For some,
creating an offspring is their most important legacy.
The desire to create life through reproduction inspires
people to go to great lengths. The popularity of assisted
reproductive technologies like egg freezing, in vitro
fertilization, surrogacy, and others proves this. To what
extent does the idea of death impact the way that we live?
Our legacies may not only be personal and tangible, but
public and emotionally-fraught. Such legacies uncovered
in our political and cultural investments expose potential
horror stories of losing our well-being, our actual lives,
and/or our perceived shares of an inheritance. The
question “Who Built America?” generates huge emotional
responses among its discussants: African-Americans,
Native Americans, and immigrants from Europe, the
Americas, Asia, and other continents. At stake is a seat at
the table where nations’ legacies are created.
THEME 7
Honors Program Guide 21
Gire, J. (2014). How death imitates life: Cultural inuences
on conceptions of death and dying. Online Readings
in Psychology and Culture. International Association
for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 1-22. Retrieved
from https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.
cgi?article=1120&context=orpc
Gire explored how various cultures dene death and
dying to argue for the importance of considering cultural
diversity in approaching and understanding grief and
mourning practices.
Horowitz, A. (2010). Inside of a dog: What dogs see,
smell, and know. New York, NY: Scribner.
Horowitz, a cognitive scientist, explored ways in which
dogs perceive and experience life.
Kübler-Ross, E. (2014). On death & dying: What the dying
have to teach doctors, nurses, clergy, and their own
families, (reprint ed.). New York, NY: Scribner.
With updated resources, Kubler-Ross’s seminal study of
life, death, and transitions introduced the ve stages of
grief and her research about ways health care and religious
professionals can best help ease humans’ transitions.
Ostwalt, C. (2016). Visions of the end: Secular apocalypse
in recent Hollywood lm. Journal of Religion
and Film, 2(1), 1-13. Retrieved from https://
digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.
cgi?article=1861&context=jrf
Ostwalt argued that Hollywood lms, like lm critics,
act as popular analysts of religion in society. Reviewing
Waterworld and 12 Monkeys, Ostwalt demonstrated
that such lms reveal the degree to which the lms both
“commend” the continued importance of religion in
popular culture and “critique” the particular ways in which
religious understandings show up in the same.
Sunderam S., Kissin D. M., Zhang Y., Folger, S., Boulet,
S., Warner, L., Callaghan, W., & Bareld, W. (2016).
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -
United States, 2016 surveillance summaries. 68(4),
1–23. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/
volumes/68/ss/ss6804a1.htm
The rst U.S. infant conceived with assisted reproductive
technology (ART) was born in 1981. Since then, the use of
ART to assist in human reproduction has steadily increased.
This study examined the impact of ART-related births on
the health of mothers and babies.
Discover More
22 Honors Program Guide
HONORS IN ACTION
PLANNING AND JUDGING RUBRIC
ACADEMIC RIGOR OF RESEARCH – 34 points
Research Question
5 points - The chapter developed a thoughtful, answerable
research question to guide its academic investigation of the
Honors Study Topic through one of the themes in the current
Honors Program Guide.
Research Objectives
5 points - Research objectives clearly emphasized the
importance of intentional research as the cornerstone of the
Honors in Action project.
Note: Research objectives are related to your Honors
Study Topic academic research and include, but are not
limited to, things such as the development of your Honors
in Action (HIA) team, the number of sources to review (this
can certainly be more than eight, but you choose the eight
most impactful sources to include in your Hallmark Award
entry), how the team will determine research conclusions, the
team’s reection objectives, the project timeline, and other
objectives you hope to accomplish with your HIA project.
Academic Research
5 points - The entry clearly conveys in-depth academic
research into the Honors Study Topic through one of the
Themes in the current Honors Program Guide.
Research Conclusions
5 points - The in-depth academic research clearly provided
substantial material for the chapter to carefully weigh and
consider in determining an action component to implement
that clearly addressed a nding and is directly connected to
their research conclusions. Clear, compelling evidence shows
the research activities allowed participants to strengthen
critical thinking skills.
Note: Research conclusions are what you learned and can
articulate from your substantive academic research into
PTK’s Honors Study Topic. Hallmark Award judges should
see evidence of members’ critical thinking and research
skills strengthened as a result of the chapter’s academic
research. The research conclusions lead you directly to your
chapter’s action – be sure to make it clear WHY your research
conclusions led to your specic plan of action.
Bibliography/Citations
A. Academic Sources
3 points - The chapter’s research included eight sources that
were clearly academic publications or academic interviews
with expert sources conducted in the past year by the
chapter team.
B. Sources’ Range of Viewpoints
3 points - Expert sources are clearly wide-ranging and
clearly represent different points of view about the Honors
Study Topic and the Theme selected by the chapter from the
current Honors Program Guide.
Citations
A. APA Citations Structure
3 points - The citations are written in formal, full, and
consistent APA style and structure.
B. Bibliographic Annotations
3 points - Bibliographic annotations of academic sources
provide robust evidence supporting why the source was
signicant to the chapter’s research and how the evidence
clearly related to the chapter’s research conclusions.
Spelling and Grammar
2 points - Spelling and grammar are faultless. Entry is
well-written and easy to follow.
Honors Program Guide 23
SERVICE/ACTION – 33 points
Action Objectives
5 points - Project objectives were clearly measurable and
clearly emphasized the importance of taking action or serving
AND emphasized the clearly dened proposed scope of
the project.
Action’s Connection to PTK’s Honors Study Topic
6 points - The chapter clearly shows with specic evidence
how the action was developed from the chapter’s Honors
Study Topic research conclusions.
Outreach/Collaboration
5 points - The chapter’s project (Academic Investigation
and/or Action) reached a variety of audiences including
BOTH the college and the community, and the role(s) played
by collaborators were substantive and stemmed from the
chapter’s research conclusions.
Communication
5 points - There is clear and compelling evidence that
communication among the participating individuals and/
or organizations was effective and efcient and that they
explicitly shared common objectives.
Heightened Awareness of Self and Community in Relation
to Global Issues
5 points - Solid, specic evidence is given that chapter,
college, and community participants heightened their
awareness of self and community in relation to global issues.
Increased Appreciation for Value of
Informed Action as Lifelong Endeavor
5 points - The entry provided clear, strong, and specic
evidence that participants increased their appreciation
for the value of informed action/service as a
lifelong endeavor.
Spelling and Grammar
2 points - Spelling and grammar are faultless.
Entry is well-written and easy to follow.
Honors Program Guide 23
IMPACT – 33 points
Contribution to Understanding of the Honors Study Topic
6 points - Without question, the project made substantial,
specic contributions to participants’ understanding of a
Theme as it relates to the current Honors Study Topic.
Contribution to Understanding of the Importance of
Lifelong Intentional Service
5 points - Without question, the action piece of the project
made a substantial, specic, and measurable contribution
to improving an issue determined from the chapter’s Honors
Study Topic research conclusions and within the clearly
dened proposed scope.
Contribution to Improving an Issue within the Clearly
Dened Proposed Scope
5 points - Without question, the project had signicant,
specic, short-term impact and clear potential for long-term
impact.
Research Quantitative and Qualitative Outcomes
5 points - Without question, the project’s research outcomes
were exceptional and specic for the Honors in Action time
frame, addressed the chapter’s objectives, and were both
quantitative and qualitative.
Research outcomes are related to your Honors Study Topic
academic research and research objectives and include,
but are not limited to, things such as the development of
your Honors in Action (HIA) team, the number of sources
reviewed (this can certainly be more than eight, but you
choose the eight most impactful sources to include in your
Hallmark Award entry), how the team determined its research
conclusions, how the team reected throughout the research
part of the project, how the team met its project timeline, and
how the chapter met its other research-related objectives.
Finally, how did the team determine whether members grew
as scholars and leaders?
Action Quantitative and Qualitative Outcomes
5 points - Without question, the project’s action outcomes
were exceptional and specic for the Honors in Action time
frame, addressed the chapter’s objectives, and were both
quantitative and qualitative.
Reection
5 points - Without question, the chapter assessed in an
intentional, consistent, and reective way throughout the
project what they learned, how they grew as scholars and
leaders, and how they met their proposed project objectives.
Spelling and Grammar
2 points - Spelling and grammar are faultless. Entry is well-
written and easy to follow.
Check out the latest version of the Honors in Action Hallmark Award questions and judging rubric at
https://portal.ptk.org/Programs/HallmarkAwards/HallmarkAwardCategories
Looking for examples of Honors in Action projects and Hallmark Award entries?
Check out the latest edition of Civic Scholar: Phi Theta Kappa Journal of Undergraduate Research at
https://www.ptk.org/Programs/HonorsinAction/CivicScholar.aspx
24 Honors Program Guide
Honors Program Guide 25
IDENTIFYING AND ANALYZING
ACADEMIC SOURCES
A SCREENING PROCESS FOR LOCATING GREAT
ACADEMIC SOURCES
When researching an Honors Study Topic Theme for an
Honors in Action project, members should follow an efcient
and effective method for identifying academic sources.
Given that not all academic sources are created equal, here
are some strategies for conducting research and evaluating
sources.
Finding your best academic sources should involve two to
three searches and time to review what you nd. Once you
have found academic sources, read them and take notes
about why the sources are important to your research. That
way, you will have the notes for drawing research conclusions
and writing bibliographical annotations.
PRELIMINARIES
After determining your chapter’s theme and research
question, organize key words of your research question into
appropriate search terms.
Example: The sample research question on page 29 of the
guide is the following:
Theme 4: Expressions of Truth
How might students evaluate the inherited body of
knowledge around climate change to create a legacy of
information literacy for future students?
Possible Initial Search Terms: climate change, opposition
to climate change, global warming
These terms can be searched via your library’s databases
and resources. Remember, research librarians can help
you as you search for academic sources. On the web, try
Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/ ) to search
for scholarly and legal sources.
In the example provided, students might also look for
specic scientists or universities whose faculty argue for
or against climate change.
FIRST SEARCH: TYPE AND RELEVANCY OF
ACADEMIC SOURCES
Type
For your rst search, use the initial search terms created by
your HIA team and review them for both the types of texts
found and their relevance. Texts can be classied traditionally
as primary or secondary sources, or, more currently, within the
context of multimodality.
What is multimodality?
Multimodality is a theory of communication and learning
that organizes knowledge into ve distinct learning modes
(semiotic groups): textual, aural, linguistic, spatial, and visual.
Multimodal educators and researchers may use two or more
modes in conducting research or in teaching and learning
processes. Multimodality is inclusive of cultural, linguistic,
communicative, and technological diversity in the world. As
communication practices have changed drastically over the
past 20 years, it is desirable, even necessary, to think of using
more than written materials for academic research purposes.
Progressively, there is a need to compose materials in formats
that are accessible to all learning styles.
The following graphic provides examples of multimodal
research tools. This graphic is not exhaustive. You may note
that the references provided both online and in the Honors
Program Guide include several different modes.
The discussion that follows applies generally to all types of
texts. When there are references to specic considerations for
specic texts, they are explicitly noted.
Textual
Written words as in books, articles,
novels, advertisements
Aural
Linguistic
Spatial
Visual
Speeches, podcasts, videos,
audiobooks, music, storytelling
Interviews, focus groups,
spoken word, speeches, books
Dance, storytelling (gestures),
graphic novels, posters
Images, media, maps, documentaries,
live performances, animation
Relevancy
“Data is inherently dumb,” proclaimed Peter Sondergaard,
head of research at Gartner, Inc., a global research and
advisory rm. “It doesn’t actually do anything unless you
know how to use it; how to act with it...” (Oliver, 2015).
Aside from type, your rst search should review the sources
found for relevance, because breaking down your research
question into potential search terms may still not yield the
most focused and useful results.
So, what are you looking for?
First, take time to determine which types of multimodal
sources might be relevant to your project. For example, if you
are researching the hidden voices of young adults in an urban
setting, then perhaps spoken word performances may be an
excellent multimodal research tool to consider along with
expert sources that help you interpret the performances. On
the other hand, if your research is about incarceration rates
in urban environments, it is highly likely that spoken word
performances may not be credible nor reliable.
As another example, you may have interesting conversations
with a friend regarding the Korean War; however, these
conversations would not be considered reliable research
about the war. Conducting an academic interview with a
veteran who had rst hand experience of the war through
service would be much more credible and reliable.
Second, review your potential sources to see whether or not
they are useful to your HIA team. That is, what information
would the source provide you that you need? By examining
titles and abstracts, you can easily determine if the source will
provide useful historical or theoretical information regarding
your topic. Perhaps the source contains an answer to your
research question with a rationale for that answer. Or, perhaps
your source surveys a number of potential responses to
your question so that you can easily see how scholars have
discussed your research question thus far.
Third, to the extent possible, you should try to determine
what the author’s purpose, overall project, or thesis is so that
you do not use the author’s work out of context or unfairly.
Lastly, once you have determined that a source is relevant, you
should scan the references to see if there are seminal sources
(works that are classic or essential to the eld) listed and scan
the document to see if there are any additional keywords that
will support you in revising and focusing your search.
26 Honors Program Guide
Honors Program Guide 27
SECOND SEARCH: CURRENCY AND
CREDIBILITY/ETHOS
Currency
Your second search should utilize the more focused keywords
and authors that you found in your rst pass in the databases
and/or Google Scholar. However, this time, do not review the
list right away. Instead, lter it so that you only search within
the last ve years, unless you are dealing with seminal works.
Occasionally, you will encounter a topic or question that no
one has researched in the last ve years. Then, of course, you
want to nd whatever is the most current research available and
gure out why no one has worked on this topic in some time.
Credibility/Ethos
Once you have ltered your list for currency, you can start to
sort for credibility. The credibility of a source depends on the
type of source being used. While the section “Type” in the
previous graphic will help your HIA team classify the sources
that you are using, also consider the following rules of thumb:
1. Books
Generally speaking, self-published books are not
considered as credible as books published by commercial
publishers and/or university presses. In terms of credibility,
university press published books rank highest, because
they tend to receive much more scrutiny from experts in a
given eld.
2. Periodicals/Journals
We are entering an era where academic knowledge
building is being increasingly democratized and digitized,
which is great. Nevertheless, greater accessibility of
information may belie its credibility. If you decide to
use open access resources, you should review them
carefully to ensure that the information has been properly
vetted by experts in the eld. Peer-reviewed research is
simply more credible.
3. Internet Domains
Researchers are encouraged to stick closely to the
domains of educational institutions (.edu) and the
government (.gov) or the military (.mil). This does not
mean that the other domains — .net, .com, .org — are
useless. They, however, require more scrutiny and review,
as discussed in the last section.
Further Review
After two distinct searches, you are now ready to read more
deeply the works that are left before you. What you are now
looking for are logical, grammatical, and intellectual errors
that may reduce a writer’s credibility even if the work passed
the tests for relevance and currency above. Some areas of
review include the following:
1) Bias – We are all biased, but when does one’s bias
override one’s credibility? One great example of this is a
site about the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. that is hosted
by NeoNazis. Again, “data is dumb” (Oliver, 2015). While
specic facts may be accurate, the overall interpretation
may be misleading.
2) Logical Fallacies – You can nd a number of websites
online that discuss common logical fallacies, such as ad
hominem (to attack a person rather than the person’s
argument) or straw man (to distort an argument so as to
more easily rebut it). Your English instructor or a librarian
or a logician can easily assist you in sorting through
articles for logical fallacies.
3) Grammatical Errors and Typos – If an author and/
or editor has not effectively edited the material,
the argument(s) proposed may not be very sound.
Researchers are encouraged to pay close attention to
such details.
4) Factual Errors – If the author’s facts are incorrect, this may
mean that their overall argument or thesis is also incorrect
or ill-informed.
REFERENCES
The Audiopedia. (2018). What is multimodality? What
does multimodality mean? Multimodality meaning &
explanation. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=mymp7Ep72Ho
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of
multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard
Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93. Retrieved
from http://newarcproject.pbworks.com/f/
Pedagogy+of+Multiliteracies_New+London+
Group.pdf
Beck, S.E., (2009). The good, the bad & the ugly: Or, why
it’s a good idea to evaluate web sources: Criteria for
evaluating sources. New Mexico State University Library.
Retrieved from http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction_backup/
evalcrit.html
Blakeslee, S. (2004). The CRAAP Test. LOEX Quarterly,
31(3), 6-7. Retrieved from https://commons.emich.edu/
loexquarterly/vol31/iss3/4/
Heldt, T. (n.d.). Social and political dimensions of information
literacy: Readings and research skills. Harold Washington
College Library. Retrieved from http://lis101.com/
Indiana Wesleyan University. (2019). Boolean operators. Off
Campus Library Services. Retrieved from https://ocls.
indwes.edu/boole.htm
Mills, K.A. & Unsworth, L. (n.d.). Curriculum and pedagogy,
technology and education, languages and literacies.
ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/322950599_Multimodal_literacy
National Centre for Research Methods: Economic and
Social Research Council. (2019). Glossary of multimodal
terms. Retrieved from https://multimodalityglossary.
wordpress.com/
Oliver, H. (2015). Data is dumb, it’s what you do with it that’s
smart (Or: Data is dead! Long live data!). Idealog.
Retrieved from https://idealog.co.nz/tech/2015/10/data-
dumb-its-what-you-do-it-s-smart-or-data-dead-long-live-
data
Pierce, J. (2019). Understanding sources. Leesburg, FL: Lake-
Sumter State College.
Thomas, R. (2019). Google scholar: An essential research
tool: How google scholar searches. University of Regina
Library. Retrieved from https://uregina.libguides.com/c.
php?g=606135&p=4201992
Salmons, J. (2019). Methodspace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.methodspace.
com/multimodal-qualitative-research-study-complex-
problems/
Santa Ana College Nealley Library Pathnder. (n.d.).
Distinguishing scholarly journals from other periodicals.
DR RSCCD Publications Form 0401-031-EPM6.5.
Retrieved from https://www.sac.edu/Library/Documents/
pth%20scholarly.pdf
The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University.
(2019). Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/
28 Honors Program Guide
Start exploration of the Honors Study Topic with a broad
examination of To the Seventh Generation: Inheritance
and Legacy.
Read and reect on introductory essay on pages 5-7.
Read and review the 7 themes and their introductions
beginning on page 8.
Consider themes that trigger your chapter’s curiosity and
passions.
Discuss possible issues relevant to the themes that
genuinely interest your team and consider how those
issues relate to your campus and community.
Explore what’s current in the national and international
news, on your campus, and in your community. You are
building contextual knowledge that will direct your team
toward a theme and help you develop a question that will
direct your initial research.
From your contextual knowledge, use your observation
to help lead your team to a research question.
Explore issues within the themes. Remember, not all
issues are specically stated in the theme, as this is an
intellectual framework and a guide to provoke discussion.
As you choose a theme, consider which
theme seems most relevant to the
intellectual curiosities of your
chapter members.
Make sure the pursuit of your intellectual curiosity is
interdisciplinary and global. Though your chapter will
likely work at the local level, be sure to initially consider
your theme through an international lens.
From your team’s observations, begin developing research
questions by asking:
What do we want to nd out about our research topic?
What research have scholars conducted already?
What remains undiscovered about this topic?
What are the relevant and credible sources, and how
readily available are they?
Remember, when you answer research question(s), two
important developments can happen that are normal parts
of the process:
The scope and nature of your question can change.
Your theme may change based on what your team nds.
Sample Research Question:To what degree have inherited
understandings of freedom of the press guided societies
worldwide? (Theme 6)
DEVELOPING A RESEARCH QUESTION
Honors Program Guide 29
Keeping a journal throughout the HIA project is an important
tool to track what you learned, how you grew as scholars and
leaders, and how you met your proposed project objectives.
Reection is a signicant part of the HIA project rubric.
• Everyone on the HIA team should keep a journal.
Journaling can be accomplished on paper or online (check
out Google Docs, Glimpses, Memento, etc.)
Consider setting deadlines for reections as part of your
project timeline.
Get ready; get set; go!
Congratulations on being a part of your Phi Theta Kappa
chapter’s Honors in Action Team! How did your chapter
choose the team, and how do you think you might grow
individually as a leader and a scholar during the process?
What were your research objectives for the project?
Which themes in the Honors Program Guide were most
interesting to you and why?
How did your group choose your theme related to the
Honors Study Topic?
Does the theme address a real-life issue in your
community?
What are your deadlines?
If you want good answers, you must ask the right
questions, and set the right objectives.
What are your research objectives? How did you develop
them?
What is your research question? Is your question
thoughtful and answerable?
Is your question directly related to one of the themes
AND the overall Honors Study Topic in the current Honors
Program Guide?
By what process did you develop your research question?
Who (faculty, advisors, librarians, experts) engaged in
the research and development that led to your research
question?
What different disciplines can you connect to your theme
as it relates to the Honors Study Topic?
What are the varied perspectives and points of view to
explore?
What sources can you identify that represent the varied
points of view about your theme as it relates to the Honors
Study Topic?
What are the details of your research plan (number and
type of sources, deadlines for reporting, etc.)?
HONORS IN ACTION JOURNAL
30 Honors Program Guide
What did you learn? What conclusions did your team draw?
What academic sources did each researcher consult? What
were the three most meaningful things each researcher
learned from each source that informed your understanding
of the chosen theme as it relates to the Honors Study Topic?
What did you learn from analyzing and synthesizing your
team’s research?
What are your research conclusions?
What obstacles did you face while conducting research?
How did you overcome them?
What are the quantitative and qualitative outcomes of your
research?
How were your critical thinking and research skills
strengthened as a result of the chapter’s academic research?
How can you provide any evidence of this growth?
How did your academic research into the Honors Study
Topic help you better understand the world?
How have you shared the studies, research, analysis, and
conclusions with chapter members, people on campus, and/
or community members?
What specic plan of action did your research conclusions
lead you to choose? Explain how and why.
How did your answers change your questions?
In what ways was your HIA research personally challenging?
How did your answers change your questions?
What pre-conceived ideas held by members of your team
were challenged and/or changed through the research
process?
What will you do with your newfound knowledge?
What did you learn during the academic research phase of
your HIA project that led you to identify an action that tied
directly to your team’s research on the Honors Study Topic?
Whom will you serve? (demographics, numbers,
location, etc.)
How will your project serve your campus? How will your
project serve your community?
What organizations exist locally that are engaged in actions
(service, awareness, advocacy) similar to what you aim to
do? What can you learn from their work?
What organizations exist in the world that are engaged in
actions similar to what you aim to do? How does their work
inform yours?
What is the specic impact you intend to make?
What are the details of your strategies and plans?
How are you going to measure the impact (quantitative
measures and qualitative measures)?
Reect on how knowing more helped to change you, your
chapter members, your community, and the world.
What are the specic results and impacts of your research,
growth as scholars and leaders, and the resulting action?
What are the reactions and feedback from the people and
organizations with whom you collaborated?
What is necessary for your service/action project to be
sustained and grow?
With whom did you collaborate to complete your project?
1) People on campus? 2) Community members? How
and why did you select your collaborators? How did you
communicate with them, and how did you collectively
reect on your HIA project?
Did you meet your chapter’s initial objectives?
Honors Program Guide 31
32 Honors Program Guide
To the Seventh Generation: Inheritance and Legacy
How might students evaluate the inherited body of
knowledge around climate change to create a legacy of
information literacy for students to come?
1. Provide a brief abstract or summary of your Honors in
Action project including
a. academic research into and analysis of sources
related to the Honors Study Topic;
b. action that addresses a need in your community that
was discovered through your research and analysis
into the Society’s current Honors Study Topic, and;
c. the impact of your project.
(Note: Recommended word count for the abstract is no more
than 300 words.)
Evaluating scientic writing to determine which of two
opposing viewpoints is correct can pose challenges to
undergraduate students. We choose to examine how
literature connected to climate change includes multiple
viewpoints around seemingly established scientic facts
and principles. College students and community members
at-large must understand that while we may disagree on
certain topics, there needs to be some authoritative method
to identify truth in writing, which may facilitate better and
more open communication within society. As we examine
the Honors Study Topic, To the Seventh Generation:
Inheritance and Legacy, we felt this best t into Theme
4: Expressions of Truth. Our project’s impact was to help
people better understand how to vet a source to determine
if its content could be supported by accepted science or
was not supported with the scientic rigor used to reach
those conclusions. We examined several sources concerning
whether or not they agreed with the accepted science
on global climate change and evaluated what types of
sources were more apt to utilize citations and bibliographic
information to support their points. To help the campus
community and local citizens gain a better understanding
of how to identify quality versus marginal sources, we held a
workshop in which participants were broken into sequestered
groups, asked to evaluate two questions as they related
to climate change, collect sources, then reconvened to
examine and discuss those sources. Results of the workshop
were positive, and participants came away from it with
an enhanced understanding of how science is properly
communicated, and what it takes to identify accepted
scientic writing.
2. What theme in the current Honors Program Guide did
your chapter focus on?
Theme 4: Expressions of Truth
3. Summarize your research objectives. What did your
chapter set out to accomplish in terms of its research?
Research Component Objectives:
Using climate science as the focal point, collect and
examine works both supporting the most widely-held
scientic positions on global climate change, as well as
those that do not agree with the mainstream scientic
positions concerning the same.
Categorize the major arguments that both support and
argue against climate change science; attribute sources to
each of the main categories.
Examine the validity of the sources based on common
standards in academia; create categories for argument-
source groups that will allow us to understand what
institutions support mainstream scientic fact and what
institutions argue against the same.
4. Describe your academic research into the Honors
Study Topic, your research question(s), your analysis of
your research ndings, and your research conclusions.
Our major research questions focused on how to: 1) better
understand what is creating the divide between established
science reporting and arguments against scientic ndings,
and; 2) how understanding the division, in terms of its source,
can help us better determine what constitutes a high-quality
and academically-acceptable source. Beginning with a faculty
member in the science department and the research librarian,
we sought to collect seminal works regarding climate change
in order to understand the currently-accepted arguments
on the subject. The professor and librarian assisted us in
learning how to use the library’s database to identify literature
on the topic. We then decided on several phrases to use in
general Internet searches (non-academic databases) such
as “arguments against climate change,” “differing views
on climate science,” and “climate science debates.” We
used ProCon.org, too, because the site offered arguments
from varied sides about whether human activity is primarily
responsible for climate change. This allowed us to build
a library of sources that typically argued against the
mainstream positions on climate science in general
and global climate change specically (133 sources
in total). Source material with annotations was
stored using a bibliography creation platform for
easier cataloging and referencing, and later, citing
in APA format for writing and editing the HIA
Hallmark Award entry.
SAMPLE HONORS IN ACTION PROJECT
We broke the research team into two groups, with each
group responsible for reading each of the works collected
(i.e., all researchers read all works). Then, we decided into
which group the work belonged: 1) aligned with the currently
accepted science on climate change, or 2) in opposition to
the same. We then reconvened and compared lists to make a
nal determination into which category each work belonged.
In cases where we were not in agreement (13), we met with the
science professor to help explain the position of the author
more clearly, and again attempted to categorize the work.
In 10 of the 13 cases we were able to do so, and the three
(3) remaining papers that could not be agreed upon were
removed from further consideration, leaving 130 works in the
study. In total we identied 102 (of 130, 78.4%) publications
that aligned with mainstream science and 28 (of 130, 21.6%)
that did not. Then, within each category, we determined
whether the source was: 1) an academic (peer-reviewed)
journal; 2) a book; 3) a government report; 4) a non-prot
(private) agency report; 5) a newspaper or other media outlet
piece, or; 6) a “personal” webpage or blog.
5. List the eight academic/expert sources that were most
enlightening regarding multiple perspectives of the
Honors Study Topic theme you selected. Briey explain
why these were the most important sources and what you
learned from each of them as you researched your theme.
NOTE: Please use full, formal APA citations for your entry.
(Four resources listed here, one with an annotation, for the
purpose of the sample HIA project. Chapters will use more
academic sources as they develop HIA projects, and the eight
most meaningful to their projects will be listed and annotated
as part of their HIA Hallmark Award entries.)
Cook, J., Oreskes N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R.
L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S.,
Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S. A., Nuccitelli,
D., Jacobs, P., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting,
R., & Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A
synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused
global warming. Environmental Research Letters,
11(4), 1–7. Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/
article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Climate change, more commonly and incorrectly lumped
under the label “global warming,” is a charged topic in social,
economic, scientic, and political arenas. Several studies prior
to Cook, et al. have attempted to measure the degree to
which the scientic community believes that humans are the
primary cause of climate change. While having come under
re upon its release, from obvious detractors, the Cook study
represents the most comprehensive explanation of consensus
among climate scientists yet.
Colepicolo, E. (2015). Information reliability for academic
research: Review and recommendations. New Library
World, 116(11/12), 646–660. Retrieved from https://doi.
org/10.1108/NLW-05-2015-0040
Mai, J.E. (2013). The quality and qualities of information.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
and Technology, 64(4), 675-688. Retrieved from http://
jenserikmai.info/Papers/2013_QandQofInfo.pdf
Sorenson, M.E. (2016). Beyond the Google search bar:
Evaluating source credibility in contemporary research.
Communication Teacher, 30(2), 82-86. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2016.1139150
6. Summarize your project action and collaboration object
ives. In other words, what did your chapter set out to
accomplish in terms of its collaborations and action?
Honors Program Guide 33
34 Honors Program Guide
6. Summarize your project action and collaboration
objectives. In other words, what did your chapter set out
to accomplish in terms of its collaborations and actions?
Action Component Objectives:
Host a research librarian-facilitated workshop examining
methods by which students can effectively vet sources
to help determine the level of academic rigor and/or
acceptability.
Produce a professional poster highlighting the difference
between academically acceptable sources and non-
academic sources to be presented at the college’s fall
research forum.
Collaboration Component Objectives:
Enlist the assistance of one professor from four distinct
academic areas, as well as the college librarian, to assist
us in developing a rubric to help identify the major criteria
that make a source more or less academically acceptable.
Develop a resources page based on the workshop to be
included on the college library’s Academic Resources page.
7. Describe the service or “action” components of this
Honors in Action project that were inspired by and
directly connected to your Honors Study Topic research.
(Action can also include promoting awareness and
advocacy.) Be sure to include information about the
people and/or groups with whom you collaborated, why
you chose these collaborators, and the impact they had
on the outcomes of the project.
In order to utilize this review of publications on climate
science to help us better understand source material, and
the importance of relying on works produced from rigorous
application of accepted research principles and publish with
reference to other works and currently accepted knowledge
in the eld, we decided to hold a workshop focused on
identifying quality source material. Participants, with access
to a desktop (the workshop was held in the computer lab and
two adjoining classrooms) or a laptop, were provided with
the rubric we created, and were broken into three groups: 1)
one-third were asked to use only the college library to nd
sources; 2) one-third were asked only to look in newspaper
or other media outlets, or non-prot agency pages, and;
3) one-third were given no parameters at all concerning
what sources they could access. Each group was assigned
a different room and given the same two questions to
address through the use of their assigned source-types. The
questions were:
1. To what extent is it natural for climate to uctuate, and
how does current climate science address this?
2. How do we know for sure that human-derived greenhouse
gases cause the planet to warm?
Once participants had collected at least two sources per
question, and graded them on the rubric, the three groups
convened in the library to discuss their source material, how
it supported each position, and on what previous work the
source drew for support. The librarian then worked through
several examples using the completed rubrics actual results
from participants to illustrate what constituted a good
academic source and what was lacking from sources deemed
not academically acceptable by a panel of four professors.
The workshop concluded with a question-and-answer session
directed at the professor panel and the librarian.
8. What are the quantitative and qualitative outcomes
of your project? What impact did your project have on
the problem addressed and on opportunities for chapter
members and others to grow as scholars and leaders?
Our quantitative outcomes led us to believe that it is more
typical to nd arguments that align with accepted science
concerning climate change in peer-reviewed works (34 of
36 examined), books (27 of 31 examined), and government
sites (12 of 12 examined) as opposed to differing viewpoints
on the topic. When examining the difference between the
mainstream and non-mainstream arguments, the non-
mainstream works appeared in the following source types in
numbers much closer to that of the mainstream arguments:
in non-prot (private) agencies reports (4 of 9 reviewed),
news outlets (13 of 31 reviewed) and personal publications
(5 of 11 reviewed). We also found that in 25 of the 28 (89.3%)
cases concerning opposition arguments, no citations
nor bibliographic information was present. Of the three
publications that did contain citations, two (2) were peer-
reviewed works and one was a book. In comparison, of the
102 publications aligned with accepted scientic knowledge,
15 of 102 (14.7%) did not contain citations or bibliographic
information (all 15 of the sources in this sub-category
were newspapers). Using our research ndings, as well as
information taken from the workshop, we worked with the
library staff to build the resources page to be included on the
library website.
The workshop presented an opportunity for students,
staff, faculty, and the community to engage in a discussion
concerning what is and is not a “good” source. While not
everyone participating in the workshop agreed on the
categorization of each source concerning its ability to
answer the questions presented, the forum created a
robust dialog in terms of how to better examine
sources rather than simply decide that any published
work is automatically acceptable to cite. The
qualitative outcomes arising from the workshop
allowed us to gain experience in critical thinking
and examining viewpoints that may not align with our own.
Moving forward as scholars, we think it is important to
gain a solid skill set in properly vetting sources to help us
produce the highest quality work possible. This will aid us in
coursework at this institution and beyond. This exploration
of Theme 4, Expressions of Truth, led us to a better
understanding of what it means to examine the source of a
published work. We will take this knowledge with us, as we
continue our academic careers and our work lives and will
do our best to preserve the legacy of academic inquiry as we
move toward the seventh generation.
Additional Honors in Action Resources, including an Honors in Action workbook and Honors in Action Online Course,
are available online at http://ptk.org/Programs/HonorsinAction.aspx
Interested in more Honors-related resources? Visit the following webpages:
Civic Scholar: Phi Theta Kappa Journal of Undergraduate Research
http://ptk.org/Programs/HonorsinAction/CivicScholar.aspx
Honors Case Study Challenge
http://ptk.org/Programs/HonorsinAction/HonorsCaseStudyChallenge.aspx
Honors Institute
http://ptk.org/Events/HonorsInstitute.aspx
Honors Program Guide 35
36 Honors Program Guide
SUSAN FREDA EDWARDS, CHAIR
Associate Vice President, Honors
Programming and Undergraduate Research
Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
Cypress, Texas
DR. ROSIE L. BANKS
Humanities Representative
Harold Washington College
DR. JOAN GALLAGHER FEDOR
Honors Consultant
Surprise, Arizona
PROF. STEVEN J. FRITTS
Leadership Development Representative
Ozarks Technical Community College
Springeld, Missouri
DR. PATRICIA D. HALL
Technical/Workforce Representative
Cañada College
Redlands, California
PROF. RAHUL KANE
STEM Representative
Century College
White Bear Lake, Minnesota
PROF. CASSANDRA POWELL
Social Sciences/Communications
Representative
Richard J. Daley College
Chicago, Illinois
PROF. LARA A. ROEMER
Service Learning Representative
Carl Sandburg College
Galesburg, Illinois
DR. TERRI SMITH RUCKEL
Humanities Representative
Pearl River Community College,
Forrest County Center
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
DR. MITCH STIMERS
STEM Representative
Cloud County Community College, Geary
County Campus
Junction City, Kansas
DR. JOHANNAH B. WILLIAMS
Associate Vice President of STEM and
Workforce Programs
Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
Jackson, Mississippi
The Phi Theta Kappa Honors Program Council is responsible for making recommendations to Headquarters staff about the
new Honors Study Topic and Honors in Action and for assisting with the writing and compilation of the Honors Program
Guide. Made up of Phi Theta Kappa chapter advisors, Headquarters staff, and consultants, the Honors Program Council
is selected for its broad knowledge of the Honors Study Topic, Phi Theta Kappa’s integrated approach to scholarship,
leadership, service, and scholarly fellowship, and its balance in academic disciplines.
Honors Program Council
Honors Program Guide 37
Established in 1968, Phi Theta Kappa’s Honors Study Topic is the cornerstone of Honors in Action and the focus of the
Society’s annual Honors Institute. The following is a list of past Honors Study Topics.
1968 Our Cultural Heritage: 1800-1860
1969 The Changing Nature of American Society: A
Challenge to Government
1970 A Study of Twentieth-Century Drama
1971 Man, A Part of Nature/Man, Apart from Nature
1972 The State of Our Nation: Toward Responsible
Contributory Citizenship
1973 Voices of Human Experience, I
1974 Voices of Human Experience, II
1975 Franklin and Jefferson: Apostles in ‘76
1976 William Faulkner: The Man, His Land, His Legend
1977 Music: The Listener’s Art
1978 Man Alive: Can He Survive?
1979 The Brilliant Future of Man: Problem Solving Time
1980 A Time for Truth
1981 Man in Crisis: A Quest for Values
1982 The Short Story: Mirror of Humanity
1983 Signed by the Masters
1984 America, A World-Class Citizen: Image and Reality
1985 Ethics and Today’s Media: An Endangered
Alliance?
1986 The American Dream: Past, Present, and Future
1987 The U.S. Constitution: Assuring Continuity
Through Controversy
1988 The Character and Climate of Leadership: Old
Frontiers and New Frontiers
1989 The Americas: Distant Neighbors Building Bridges
1990 Civilization at Risk: Challenge of the 90s
1991 The Paradox of Freedom: A Global Dilemma
1992 1492-1992: The Dynamics of Discovery
1993 Our Complex World: Balancing Unity and Diversity
1994 Science, Humanity, and Technology: Shaping a
New Creation
1995 Rights, Privileges, and Responsibilities: An
Indelicate Balance
1996 The Arts: Landscape of Our Time
1997 Family: Myth, Metaphor, and Reality
1998 The Pursuit of Happiness: Conicting Visions and
Values
1999 The New Millennium: The Past As Prologue
2000 In the Midst of Water: Origin and Destiny of Life
2001 Customs, Traditions, and Celebrations: The
Human Drive for Community
2002/2003 Dimensions and Directions of Health:
Choices in the Maze
2004/2005 Popular Culture: Shaping and Reecting
Who We Are
2006/2007 Gold, Gods, and Glory: The Global
Dynamics of Power
2008/2009 The Paradox of Afuence: Choices,
Challenges, and Consequences
2010/2011 The Democratization of Information: Power,
Peril, and Promise
2012/2013 The Culture of Competition
2014/2015 Frontiers and the Spirit of Exploration
2016/2017 How the World Works: Global Perspectives
2018/2019 Transformations: Acknowledging, Assessing,
and Achieving Change
2020/2021 To the Seventh Generation: Inheritance and
Legacy
Phi Theta Kappa Honors Study Topics
38 Honors Program Guide
ptk.org | 800.946.9995