196 PATRICIA S. MOYER
Hiebert, J. and Wearne, D.: 1992, ‘Links between teaching and learning place value with
understanding in first grade’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23, 98–
122.
Kamii, C., Kirkland, L. and Lewis, B.A.: 2001, ‘Representation and abstraction in young
children’s numerical reasoning’, in A.A. Cuoco and F.R. Curcio (eds.), The Roles of
Representation in School Mathematics, NCTM, Reston, VA, pp. 24–34.
Kamii, C. and Warrington, M.A.: 1999, ‘Teaching fractions: Fostering children’s own reas-
oning’, in L.V. Stiff and F.R. Curcio (eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning grades
K-12: 1999 Yearbook, NCTM, Reston, VA, pp. 82–92.
Khoury, H.A. and Zazkis, R.: 1994, ‘On fractions and non-standard representations: Pre-
service teachers’ conceptions’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 27(2), 191–204.
LeCompte, M.D., Preissle, J. and Tesch, R.: 1993, Ethnography and Qualitative Design in
Educational Research, 2nd ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Ma, L.: 1999, Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding
of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Meira, L.: 1998, ‘Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in
mathematical activity’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29(2), 121–142.
Moyer, P.S.: 1998, ‘Using mathematics manipulatives: Control- versus autonomy-oriented
middle grades teachers (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, 1998), Dissertation Abstracts International, 59-07A, 2406.
Orton, R.E.: 1988, Using Representations to Conceptualize Teachers’ Knowledge, Paper
presented at the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America, DeKalb, IL.
Parham, J.L.: 1983, ‘A meta-analysis of the use of manipulative materials and student
achievement in elementary school mathematics’, Dissertation Abstracts International
44A, 96.
Patton, M.Q.: 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, SAGE, Newbury Park,
CA.
Piaget, J.: 1951, Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood, Reprint, W.W. Norton and Co.,
New York.
Piaget, J.: 1952, The Child’s Conception of Number, Humanities Press, New York.
Piaget, J., Inhelder, B. and Szeminska, A.: 1960, The Child’s Conception of Geometry,
Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. (Original work published 1948). 1948/1960.
Prigge, G.R.: 1978, ‘The differential effects of the use of manipulative aids on the learn-
ing of geometric concepts by elementary school children’, Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education 9(5), 361–367.
Raphael, D. and Wahlstrom, M.: 1989, ‘The influence of instructional aids on mathematics
achievement’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20(2), 173–190.
Resnick, L.B.: 1983, ‘Mathematics and science learning: A new conception’, Science 220,
477–478.
Scott, P.B.: 1983, ‘A survey of perceived use of mathematics materials by elementary
teachers in a large urban school district’, School Science and Mathematics 83(1), 61–68.
Simon, M.A.: 1995, ‘Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspect-
ive’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26(2), 114–145.
Skemp, R.R.: 1987, The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Smith, J.P.: 1996, ‘Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform’,
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27(4), 387–402.
Sowell, E.J.: 1989, ‘Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction’, Journal
for Research in Mathematics Education 20(5), 498–505.